• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自上而下的调节会损害具有社会意义的复杂决策中的启动易感性。

Top-down modulation impairs priming susceptibility in complex decision-making with social implications.

机构信息

Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIByNE-UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Departamento de Computación, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22707-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-22707-x
PMID:36284155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9595095/
Abstract

Could social context variables prime complex decisions? Could top-down processes impair this priming susceptibility? Complex decisions have been mainly studied from economic and moral perspectives, and Dual Process Theories provide evidence of how these processes could be affected. To address these issues from a political perspective, online experiments were conducted. Participants (n = 252) were asked to choose a face from 4 options, each associated with different frequencies (repetition priming) or with phrases with different emotional valence (emotional priming), for an unspecified task (UST group) or an important task (IMT group). The most repeated face was chosen most in the UST group, and was associated with lower response times. Positive faces were equally chosen by both groups. To compare results in a more ecological situation, a social study was conducted during the 2019 Argentine Presidential Election, including online surveys (n = 3673) and analysis of news media mentioning candidates. The familiarity and trust to each candidate explained the voting-probability for most of them, as well as correlated with their frequency of mentions in the news, their positive associations, and election results. Our results suggest complex decision-making is susceptible to priming, depending on top-down modulation.

摘要

社会语境变量能否引发复杂决策?自上而下的过程是否会损害这种启动易感性?复杂决策主要从经济和道德角度进行研究,而双重过程理论提供了证据,证明这些过程可能会受到影响。为了从政治角度解决这些问题,进行了在线实验。要求参与者(n=252)从 4 个选项中选择一张脸,每个选项都与不同的频率(重复启动)或不同情感效价的短语(情绪启动)相关联,用于未指定的任务(UST 组)或重要任务(IMT 组)。UST 组中选择最常出现的面孔最多,且与响应时间更短相关。两个组都同样选择了积极的面孔。为了在更具生态性的情况下比较结果,在 2019 年阿根廷总统选举期间进行了一项社会研究,包括在线调查(n=3673)和对提及候选人的新闻媒体的分析。对每位候选人的熟悉度和信任度解释了他们中的大多数人的投票可能性,这与他们在新闻中的提及频率、他们的积极关联以及选举结果相关。我们的结果表明,复杂决策易受启动影响,这取决于自上而下的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/977b82507def/41598_2022_22707_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/0035450ad28a/41598_2022_22707_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/77d31c0198a6/41598_2022_22707_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/1ee01f0822f2/41598_2022_22707_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/737470def499/41598_2022_22707_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/516a5cda8553/41598_2022_22707_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/977b82507def/41598_2022_22707_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/0035450ad28a/41598_2022_22707_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/77d31c0198a6/41598_2022_22707_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/1ee01f0822f2/41598_2022_22707_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/737470def499/41598_2022_22707_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/516a5cda8553/41598_2022_22707_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f9b/9596420/977b82507def/41598_2022_22707_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Top-down modulation impairs priming susceptibility in complex decision-making with social implications.自上而下的调节会损害具有社会意义的复杂决策中的启动易感性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22707-x.
2
Repetition priming and face processing: priming occurs within the system that responds to the identity of a face.重复启动与面孔加工:启动发生在对面孔身份做出反应的系统内。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 Aug;42(3):495-512. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401234.
3
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
4
The locus of semantic priming effects in person recognition.人脸识别中语义启动效应的轨迹。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1141-56. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000189.
5
[Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].[正负效价评估与词汇决策任务的言语反应之间的联系]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Dec;59(4):255-61. doi: 10.1037/h0088053.
6
Haven't we met before? The effect of facial familiarity on repetition priming.我们以前没见过面吗?面部熟悉度对重复启动效应的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):79-94. doi: 10.1348/000712605X58583.
7
Effects of distinctiveness, repetition and semantic priming on the recognition of face familiarity.独特性、重复及语义启动对脸部熟悉度识别的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1993 Mar;47(1):38-60. doi: 10.1037/h0078773.
8
Age-related changes in implicit emotion processing.与年龄相关的内隐情绪加工变化。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019 Jan;26(1):86-104. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2017.1408769. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Task difficulty and response complexity modulate affective priming by emotional facial expressions.任务难度和反应复杂性会调节情绪面部表情的情感启动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):861-71. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.836233. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
External (Versus Internal) Facial Features Contribute Most to Repetition Priming in Facial Recognition: ERP Evidence.外部(相对于内部)面部特征在面部识别中对重复启动的贡献最大:事件相关电位证据。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Feb;128(1):15-47. doi: 10.1177/0031512520957150. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
New methods, old questions: advancing the study of unconscious perception.新方法,旧问题:推进无意识感知的研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1626223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626223. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural correlates of successful costly punishment in the Ultimatum game on a trial-by-trial basis.基于试次的最后通牒博弈中成功的昂贵惩罚的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):590-597. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab126.
2
Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game.在喜悦与同情之间:微笑和悲伤的接收面孔会增加独裁者游戏中的亲社会行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(11):6172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116172.
3
In Your Face(t)-Personality Traits Interact With Prototypical Personality Faces in Economic Decision Making.
面对面(特质)——人格特质在经济决策中与典型人格面孔相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 21;12:652506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652506. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of gender and personality on everyday moral decision-making after acute stress exposure.急性应激暴露后性别和人格对日常道德决策的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021 Feb;124:105084. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.105084. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback.使美国选民观点极化:民主党和共和党同样容易受到虚假态度反馈的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0226799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226799. eCollection 2020.
6
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.假新闻,快与慢:深思熟虑减少对虚假(而非真实)新闻标题的信任。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1608-1613. doi: 10.1037/xge0000729. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
Smiling as negative feedback affects social decision-making and its neural underpinnings.积极反馈对社会决策及其神经基础的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb;20(1):160-171. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00759-3.
8
What Underlies Political Polarization? A Manifesto for Computational Political Psychology.政治极化的根源是什么?计算政治心理学宣言。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):820-822. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.谁容易相信假新闻?易受胡编乱造影响、过度自信、熟悉度和分析思维的作用。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news.后真相时代:研究假新闻的传播规律。
Nature. 2016 Dec 21;540(7634):525. doi: 10.1038/540525a.