Jimenez Mikel, Prieto Antonio, Montoro Pedro R, Hinojosa José Antonio, Kiefer Markus
Departamento de Psicología Básica I, UNED, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1626223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626223. eCollection 2025.
Since the early experimental studies of the late 19th century, research on unconscious perception has been shaped by persistent methodological challenges and evolving experimental approaches aimed at demonstrating perception without awareness. In this review, we will discuss some of the most relevant challenges researchers have faced in demonstrating unconscious perception, and examine how different measures of awareness (e.g., objective vs. subjective) yield different awareness thresholds-often leading to two alternative approaches to demonstrating unconscious perception. We will further explore new methodologies in the field, such as regression-based Bayesian modeling, sensitivity vs. awareness (SvA) curves derived from General Recognition Theory (GRT), the liminal-prime paradigm, and two-interval forced choice (2IFC) designs. Finally, we emphasize the need for brain-based approaches to unconscious perception and discussed some promising studies in this area, while also highlighting the role of individual differences and alternative frameworks such as predictive coding and active inference views in future research. Overall, the new approaches and methodologies discussed here will advance the field by addressing the challenges inherent in demonstrating cognition in the absence of awareness.
自19世纪末的早期实验研究以来,无意识知觉的研究一直受到持续存在的方法学挑战以及旨在证明无意识知觉的不断演变的实验方法的影响。在本综述中,我们将讨论研究人员在证明无意识知觉时所面临的一些最相关的挑战,并研究不同的意识测量方法(例如,客观与主观)如何产生不同的意识阈值——这通常导致证明无意识知觉的两种替代方法。我们将进一步探索该领域的新方法,例如基于回归的贝叶斯建模、源自通用识别理论(GRT)的敏感度与意识(SvA)曲线、阈下启动范式以及二间隔迫选(2IFC)设计。最后,我们强调基于大脑的无意识知觉研究方法的必要性,并讨论该领域一些有前景的研究,同时也突出个体差异以及诸如预测编码和主动推理观点等替代框架在未来研究中的作用。总体而言,这里讨论的新方法和新途径将通过应对在无意识状态下证明认知所固有的挑战来推动该领域的发展。