• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的成本效益模型:IPECAD 建模研讨会交叉比较挑战。

Cost-effectiveness models for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: IPECAD modeling workshop cross-comparison challenge.

机构信息

Maastricht University, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Karolinska Institutet, Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2023 May;19(5):1800-1820. doi: 10.1002/alz.12811. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1002/alz.12811
PMID:36284403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126209/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The credibility of model-based economic evaluations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) interventions is central to appropriate decision-making in a policy context. We report on the International PharmacoEconomic Collaboration on Alzheimer's Disease (IPECAD) Modeling Workshop Challenge.

METHODS

Two common benchmark scenarios, for the hypothetical treatment of AD mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, were developed jointly by 29 participants. Model outcomes were summarized, and cross-comparisons were discussed during a structured workshop.

RESULTS

A broad concordance was established among participants. Mean 10-year restricted survival and time in MCI in the control group ranged across 10 MCI models from 6.7 to 9.5 years and 3.4 to 5.6 years, respectively; and across 4 mild dementia models from 5.4 to 7.9 years (survival) and 1.5 to 4.2 years (mild dementia).

DISCUSSION

The model comparison increased our understanding of methods, data used, and disease progression. We established a collaboration framework to assess cost-effectiveness outcomes, an important step toward transparent and credible AD models.

摘要

简介

在政策背景下,对阿尔茨海默病(AD)干预措施进行基于模型的经济评估的可信度是做出适当决策的核心。我们报告了国际阿尔茨海默病药物经济学合作组织(IPECAD)模型研讨会挑战赛的情况。

方法

29 名参与者共同制定了两个常见的基准情景,用于假设性治疗 AD 轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆。在一个结构化的研讨会上总结了模型结果,并进行了交叉比较。

结果

参与者之间建立了广泛的一致性。在 10 个 MCI 模型中,对照组的 10 年限制生存和 MCI 时间范围从 6.7 年到 9.5 年不等,分别为 3.4 年到 5.6 年;在 4 个轻度痴呆模型中,从 5.4 年到 7.9 年(生存)和 1.5 年到 4.2 年(轻度痴呆)不等。

讨论

模型比较增加了我们对方法、使用的数据和疾病进展的理解。我们建立了一个合作框架来评估成本效益结果,这是使 AD 模型透明和可信的重要一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb8/10126209/aad5ccb963ae/nihms-1852410-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb8/10126209/aad5ccb963ae/nihms-1852410-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb8/10126209/aad5ccb963ae/nihms-1852410-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness models for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: IPECAD modeling workshop cross-comparison challenge.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的成本效益模型:IPECAD 建模研讨会交叉比较挑战。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 May;19(5):1800-1820. doi: 10.1002/alz.12811. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Assessing cost-effectiveness of early intervention in Alzheimer's disease: An open-source modeling framework.评估阿尔茨海默病早期干预的成本效益:一个开源建模框架。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Oct;15(10):1309-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
IPECAD Modeling Workshop 2023 Cross-Comparison Challenge on Cost-Effectiveness Models in Alzheimer's Disease.2023年国际药效经济学和结果研究协会(ISPOR)建模研讨会:阿尔茨海默病成本效益模型的交叉比较挑战赛
Value Health. 2025 Apr;28(4):497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
New IPECAD Open-Source Model Framework for the Health Technology Assessment of Early Alzheimer's Disease Treatment: Development and Use Cases.用于早期阿尔茨海默病治疗健康技术评估的新型IPECAD开源模型框架:开发与应用案例
Value Health. 2025 Apr;28(4):511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions.量化和描述阿尔茨海默病的自然史和成本,以及假设干预的效果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;75(3):891-902. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191055.
6
18F PET with florbetapir for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).使用氟代硼吡咯进行18F正电子发射断层显像以早期诊断轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 22;11(11):CD012216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012216.pub2.
7
18F PET with flutemetamol for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).使用氟代甲磺酸去甲肾上腺素的18F正电子发射断层显像用于轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆的早期诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 22;11(11):CD012884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012884.
8
Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment.用于轻度认知障碍患者阿尔茨海默病所致痴呆早期诊断的结构磁共振成像
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):CD009628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009628.pub2.
9
Systematic Review of Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease.基于模型的阿尔茨海默病治疗经济评估的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul;34(7):681-707. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0392-1.
10
Perspectives of patients, care partners, and primary care physicians on management of mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease dementia.患者、护理伙伴和初级保健医生对轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病痴呆症管理的看法。
Postgrad Med. 2023 Jun;135(5):530-538. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2217025. Epub 2023 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The burden of cognitive impairment.认知障碍的负担
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70436. doi: 10.1002/alz.70436.
2
Cost-effectiveness of diagnosing and treating patients with early Alzheimer's disease with anti-amyloid treatment in a clinical setting.在临床环境中使用抗淀粉样蛋白疗法诊断和治疗早期阿尔茨海默病患者的成本效益。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;104(4):1167-1184. doi: 10.1177/13872877251323231. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
[Cardiovascular prevention in Saxony-Anhalt : Necessity and new perspectives].[萨克森-安哈尔特州的心血管疾病预防:必要性与新视角]

本文引用的文献

1
Health economic modeling for Alzheimer's disease: Expert perspectives.阿尔茨海默病的健康经济模型:专家观点
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Oct 26;8(1):e12360. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12360. eCollection 2022.
2
Projected prevalence and incidence of dementia accounting for secular trends and birth cohort effects: a population-based microsimulation study.基于人群的微模拟研究:考虑到时代趋势和出生队列效应的痴呆症预计患病率和发病率。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;37(8):807-814. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00878-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Clinical Outcome Measure Crosswalks in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;65(11):1137-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01789-x. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Estimating the Economically Justifiable Price of Limited-Duration Treatment with Donanemab for Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease in the United States.估算在美国使用多奈单抗对早期有症状阿尔茨海默病进行限期治疗的经济合理价格。
Neurol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1641-1659. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00649-y. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
5
Scenarios for the long-term efficacy of amyloid-targeting therapies in the context of the natural history of Alzheimer's disease.在阿尔茨海默病的自然病程背景下,淀粉样蛋白靶向疗法的长期疗效情景。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):6374-6383. doi: 10.1002/alz.14134. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Cross-model validation of public health microsimulation models; comparing two models on estimated effects of a weight management intervention.公共卫生微观模拟模型的跨模型验证;比较两种模型对体重管理干预效果的估计。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18134-4.
7
Progression analysis versus traditional methods to quantify slowing of disease progression in Alzheimer's disease.进展分析与传统方法定量阿尔茨海默病疾病进展减缓的比较。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Feb 29;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01413-y.
8
Associations of liver function with plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease.肝功能与阿尔茨海默病血浆生物标志物的相关性。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2625-2631. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07284-9. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
阿尔茨海默病临床结局测量转换标准:系统评价。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(2):591-608. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210060.
4
Economic evaluation of supplementing the diet with Souvenaid in patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease.补充苏维能在有前驱期阿尔茨海默病患者中的饮食中的经济评估。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Dec 11;12(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00737-9.
5
Challenges in demonstrating the value of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病的疾病修饰疗法的价值证明面临的挑战。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Dec;20(6):563-570. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1822738. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
6
Evaluating the Ability of Economic Models of Diabetes to Simulate New Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials: A Report on the Ninth Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge.评估糖尿病经济模型模拟新型心血管结局试验的能力:第九次胡德山糖尿病挑战赛报告。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1832. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
The Impact of Different Screening Model Structures on Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality Predictions: The Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction (MCLIR) Methodology.不同筛查模型结构对宫颈癌发病率和死亡率预测的影响:最大临床发病率降低(MCLIR)方法
Med Decis Making. 2020 May;40(4):474-482. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20924007. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions.量化和描述阿尔茨海默病的自然史和成本,以及假设干预的效果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;75(3):891-902. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191055.
9
Guidelines for multi-model comparisons of the impact of infectious disease interventions.传染病干预措施影响的多模型比较指南。
BMC Med. 2019 Aug 19;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1403-9.
10
Assessing cost-effectiveness of early intervention in Alzheimer's disease: An open-source modeling framework.评估阿尔茨海默病早期干预的成本效益:一个开源建模框架。
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Oct;15(10):1309-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.