Liu Sijia, Zhang Xu, Zhou Quanying
Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department of Stomatology, No. 303 Sixin Avenue, Hanyang, Wuhan 430000, Hubei, China.
Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Stomatology), No. 116 Yangyuan Street, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Oct 15;2022:5689900. doi: 10.1155/2022/5689900. eCollection 2022.
For a long time, the impact of severe periodontitis on the pulp has been the focus of periodontal clinical research. Whether the teeth with severe periodontitis should be treated with pulp has also become the focus of clinical research.
To explore the effect of periodontal endodontic therapy combined with DL therapy on severe periodontitis.
The clinical data of 100 patients with severe periodontitis from January 2020 to July 2022 were selected and included in the retrospective study. According to the different retrieval treatment methods, they were divided into the control group and the treatment group with 50 cases in each group. The control group received periodontal endodontic treatment, and the treatment group received DL treatment on the basis of the control group. The differences in periodontal probing depth (PD), toothache degree, bleeding index (BI), inflammatory factors, plaque index (PLI), and attachment loss (AL) between the two groups were compared and analyzed.
After 3 months of treatment, the bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PLI), and periodontal probing depth (PD) of the treatment group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The attachment loss (AL) of the group was not significantly different from that of the control group ( > 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups ( > 0.05). After 3 months of treatment, the levels of IL-6 and CRP in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups ( > 0.05). After 3 days of treatment, the VAS score of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05).After treatment, there were no complications during follow-up in the two groups.
The application of DL treatment has a significant effect, which can promote the healing of periodontal tissue, reduce the depth of periodontal pockets, and reduce the degree of toothache, thereby providing a reference for clinical treatment.
长期以来,重度牙周炎对牙髓的影响一直是牙周临床研究的重点。重度牙周炎患牙是否应进行牙髓治疗也成为临床研究的焦点。
探讨牙周牙髓联合治疗与DL治疗对重度牙周炎的疗效。
选取2020年1月至2022年7月100例重度牙周炎患者的临床资料,纳入回顾性研究。根据不同的检索治疗方法,将其分为对照组和治疗组,每组50例。对照组接受牙周牙髓治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上接受DL治疗。比较分析两组牙周探诊深度(PD)、牙痛程度、出血指数(BI)、炎症因子、菌斑指数(PLI)和附着丧失(AL)的差异。
治疗3个月后,治疗组的出血指数(BI)、菌斑指数(PLI)和牙周探诊深度(PD)均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。该组的附着丧失(AL)与对照组无显著差异(>0.05)。治疗前,两组炎症因子水平无显著差异(>0.05)。治疗3个月后,治疗组白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。治疗前,两组炎症因子水平无显著差异(>0.05)。治疗3天后,治疗组视觉模拟评分(VAS)显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。治疗后,两组随访期间均无并发症发生。
DL治疗的应用效果显著,可促进牙周组织愈合,降低牙周袋深度,减轻牙痛程度,从而为临床治疗提供参考。