• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么拉丁美洲科学家对公民科学作为传粉媒介监测和保护工具的看法很重要?

Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?

机构信息

Biology Institute, Federal Univ of Bahia, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, CEP: 40170-115, Brazil.

National Institute of Science and Technology in Inter and Transdisciplinary Studies in Ecology and Evolution - INCT IN-TREE, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil.

出版信息

Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8
PMID:32761554
Abstract

Pollinators are threatened all over the planet; scientific data about the status of them is essential for planning conservation and impact mitigation. Appropriate methods and costs for monitoring are being discussed and non-scientist participation in data collection in citizen science (CS) projects is a very promising option. However, there is criticism regarding the quality of data gathered by non-scientists and their real contribution to scientific research, which makes the engagement of scientists in these projects crucial for data verification and validation and training volunteers. CS is still poorly spread in Latin America, so in order to propose strategies to engage scientists, it is necessary to understand the attitude of these professionals towards CS and their interests in engaging in it. To this end, we conducted a survey with 96 biodiversity scientists based in five Latin American countries. In general, the respondents have a very favorable attitude towards CS, although only a small percentage of them are engaged in CS projects. Obtaining data for scientific research is the scientists' main interest in CS, although some of them have also expressed more altruistic reasons for engaging in CS related to ethical and social values. Our paper also suggests five interrelated strategies that can be taken to engage scientists in CS, covering the following: (a) create funding lines to support projects, (b) include extension and outreach activities in the system of scientists' evaluation, (c) promote an inter and transdisciplinary infrastructure, (d) promote scientists' building capacities in CS, and (e) encourage scientists to do science communication.

摘要

授粉媒介在全球范围内受到威胁;关于它们的现状的科学数据对于规划保护和减轻影响至关重要。正在讨论监测的适当方法和成本,并且非科学家参与公民科学(CS)项目中的数据收集是一个非常有前途的选择。然而,对于非科学家收集的数据的质量以及他们对科学研究的实际贡献存在批评,这使得科学家参与这些项目对于数据验证和验证以及培训志愿者至关重要。CS 在拉丁美洲的普及程度仍然很低,因此为了提出吸引科学家的策略,有必要了解这些专业人士对 CS 的态度以及他们参与其中的兴趣。为此,我们对五个拉丁美洲国家的 96 名生物多样性科学家进行了一项调查。总的来说,受访者对 CS 的态度非常有利,尽管只有一小部分人参与了 CS 项目。为科学研究获取数据是科学家对 CS 的主要兴趣,尽管他们中的一些人也出于与伦理和社会价值观有关的更利他主义的原因参与 CS。我们的论文还提出了可以采取的五项相互关联的策略,以吸引科学家参与 CS,包括:(a)创建资助项目的资金,(b)将推广和外联活动纳入科学家评估系统,(c)促进跨学科基础设施,(d)促进科学家在 CS 方面的能力建设,以及(e)鼓励科学家进行科学传播。

相似文献

1
Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?为什么拉丁美洲科学家对公民科学作为传粉媒介监测和保护工具的看法很重要?
Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.科学家对公民理解科学的程度及其在公众参与活动中的作用的看法和态度。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.
3
Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP.对公民科学包容性参与的内在因素进行建模:CSI-COP 参与者调查分析的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294575. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessing the emergence of pro-biodiversity practices in citizen scientists of a backyard butterfly survey.评估后院蝴蝶调查的公民科学家中出现的促进生物多样性的实践。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 10;716:136842. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136842. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Do biodiversity monitoring citizen science surveys meet the core principles of open science practices?生物多样性监测公民科学调查是否符合开放科学实践的核心原则?
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jan 12;195(2):295. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10887-y.
6
The role of citizen science in monitoring biodiversity in Ireland.公民科学在爱尔兰生物多样性监测中的作用。
Int J Biometeorol. 2014 Aug;58(6):1237-49. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0717-0. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
7
Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.运用公民科学让受卵巢癌影响的家庭参与制定基因服务拓展策略。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.
8
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.科学家对公众的认知不足阻碍了他们纠正错误信息的行为意愿。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating the quality of citizen-scientist data on pollinator communities.评估传粉者群落公民科学家数据的质量。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):607-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
10
The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science.自动反馈在公民科学中培训和留住生物记录员方面的作用。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):550-61. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12705. Epub 2016 Apr 25.