Härtel Talia, Vanhöfen Janina, Randler Christoph
Department of Biology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 24, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;13(13):2230. doi: 10.3390/ani13132230.
The loss of Earth's biodiversity is accompanied by a loss of public knowledge about species. Many scientists are convinced that knowledge about species is an important prerequisite to interest and investment in species conservation. In the past, knowledge about species has mostly been assessed using birds, but there is no consensus on which birds could serve as a baseline for knowledge about species in the general public. The aim of this study is to provide a list of the 'golden 50' bird species in Germany that can be used by educational institutions, as well as studies about species knowledge to make them more comparable. The list can also serve as a basis for the selection of so-called flagship species, which are used for the protection of habitats and other species due to their high likeability. To achieve this, three consecutive steps were conducted: an analysis of bird-related databases to determine which species might be common and known and two expert panel studies. The data analysis included several factors: species characteristics, Citizen Science data, public value and importance, and scientific studies. In both the first and second rounds, experts were asked for their opinion on which species should be known by the general public in Germany. The first expert panel, which consisted of only a small group of experts (n = 6), was mainly used to reduce the number of species for the second panel. In the second expert panel, 197 ornithologically qualified experts from all over Germany were asked for their assessment. The correlations between the expert assessments and the different variables were all significant (except for the species trait "colourfulness"), which validates the selection process used here and consequently the species list that has been compiled. The selection process can also be applied to other biogeographical regions or taxa.
地球生物多样性的丧失伴随着公众对物种知识的缺失。许多科学家深信,物种知识是对物种保护产生兴趣和进行投资的重要前提。过去,物种知识大多通过鸟类进行评估,但对于哪些鸟类可作为公众物种知识的基线,尚无共识。本研究的目的是提供一份德国“黄金50种”鸟类的名单,教育机构以及有关物种知识的研究可使用这份名单,使其更具可比性。这份名单还可作为选择所谓旗舰物种的依据,旗舰物种因其高度受欢迎而被用于栖息地和其他物种的保护。为实现这一目标,我们连续采取了三个步骤:分析与鸟类相关的数据库,以确定哪些物种可能常见且为人所知,以及两项专家小组研究。数据分析包括几个因素:物种特征、公民科学数据、公众价值和重要性以及科学研究。在第一轮和第二轮中,都询问了专家对于德国公众应该了解哪些物种的看法。第一个专家小组仅由一小群专家组成(n = 6),主要用于减少进入第二个小组的物种数量。在第二个专家小组中,来自德国各地的197名鸟类学合格专家被要求进行评估。专家评估与不同变量之间的相关性均具有显著性(物种特征“色彩丰富度”除外),这验证了此处使用的选择过程以及由此编制的物种名单。该选择过程也可应用于其他生物地理区域或分类群。