• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌检测:单视图与双视图对比

Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.

作者信息

Bassett L W, Bunnell D H, Jahanshahi R, Gold R H, Arndt R D, Linsman J

出版信息

Radiology. 1987 Oct;165(1):95-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.1.3628795.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.165.1.3628795
PMID:3628795
Abstract

Mammographic examinations of 169 patients with 172 biopsy-proved carcinomas, and of 194 healthy subjects, were interpreted independently and retrospectively by three experienced mammographers, initially as single-view oblique examinations and 6 months later as two-view oblique-cephalocaudal examinations. For the single-view examinations of the cancer patients, 67% of the cancers were correctly recommended for biopsy, additional views were requested for 23%, and a "negative" interpretation was made for 10%. For the single-view examinations of healthy subjects, biopsy was recommended for 7% and additional views were recommended for 32%. For the two-view examinations of women with cancer, 80% of the cancers were correctly recommended for biopsy, additional views were requested for 4%, and a "negative" interpretation was made for 16%. For two-view examinations of healthy subjects, biopsy was recommended for 7% and additional views were requested for only 5%. The authors conclude that single-view screening should not be performed, because it would lead to an excessive number of "call-back" examinations of healthy patients, producing additional cost and anxiety that would outweigh any theoretical benefit.

摘要

169例经活检证实患有172处癌肿的患者以及194名健康受试者接受了乳房X线检查,由三位经验丰富的乳房X线检查医师独立地进行回顾性解读,最初是单视角斜位检查,6个月后是双视角斜位-头足位检查。对于癌症患者的单视角检查,67%的癌症被正确建议进行活检,23%的病例被要求补充检查,10%的病例被解读为“阴性”。对于健康受试者的单视角检查,7%的病例被建议活检,32%的病例被建议补充检查。对于癌症女性患者的双视角检查,80%的癌症被正确建议进行活检,4%的病例被要求补充检查,16%的病例被解读为“阴性”。对于健康受试者的双视角检查,7%的病例被建议活检,仅5%的病例被要求补充检查。作者得出结论,不应进行单视角筛查,因为这将导致对健康患者进行过多的“召回”检查,产生额外的成本和焦虑,而这将超过任何理论上的益处。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.乳腺癌检测:单视图与双视图对比
Radiology. 1987 Oct;165(1):95-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.1.3628795.
2
Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.乳腺钼靶摄影:不同投照体位的比较
J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Apr;81(4):391-4.
3
Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.基线筛查乳房X光检查:每侧乳房拍摄一张还是两张片子。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Dec;147(6):1149-53. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1149.
4
Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress.斜位乳腺摄影:用于筛查的适宜性。研究进行中。
Radiology. 1984 Apr;151(1):39-41. doi: 10.1148/radiology.151.1.6701330.
5
Mammographic screening for breast cancer: recall rates using two views compared with the oblique view alone.乳腺癌的乳腺钼靶筛查:使用双视图与仅使用斜视图的召回率比较。
Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Jun;44(6):213-5.
6
Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.二次筛查乳腺钼靶检查:每侧乳房采用一个投照位与两个投照位的比较
Radiology. 1988 Sep;168(3):651-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406393.
7
An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.关于在乳腺癌筛查中双视图乳腺X线摄影为何优于单视图的调查。
Clin Radiol. 2000 Jun;55(6):454-8. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0448.
8
Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Aug;143(2):403-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.2.403.
9
Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.乳腺钼靶筛查:对35至39岁女性的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Jul;161(1):53-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.1.8517320.
10
Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma.乳腺癌保乳治疗后常规放大视图的效用。
Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):341-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596828.

引用本文的文献

1
Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.周年纪念论文:冠心病及定量图像分析的历史与现状:医学物理与美国医学物理学家协会的作用
Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5799-820. doi: 10.1118/1.3013555.
2
Feasibility of volume-of-interest (VOI) scanning technique in cone beam breast CT--a preliminary study.锥形束乳腺CT中感兴趣容积(VOI)扫描技术的可行性——一项初步研究。
Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3482-90. doi: 10.1118/1.2948397.
3
Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
乳腺肿块的计算机辅助检测系统:全场数字化乳腺X线摄影与数字化屏-片乳腺X线摄影性能比较
Acad Radiol. 2007 Jun;14(6):659-69. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.017.
4
A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.对雅芳乳腺筛查项目中现患癌、新发癌和间期癌的比较性审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jul;79(4):272-5.
5
One and two view mammography in breast cancer. Many subjects in trial were not asked for consent.乳腺癌的乳腺钼靶单视图和双视图检查。试验中的许多受试者未被征求同意。
BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):509. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7029.509.
6
Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.三年的乳房筛查间隔时间是否过长?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)乳房筛查项目西北地区的间期癌发生情况。
BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):224-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.224.
7
What should be done about interval breast cancers?对于间期乳腺癌应该怎么做?
BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):203-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.203.
8
A licence for breast cancer screening?乳腺癌筛查许可证?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Mar 26;296(6626):909-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6626.909.
9
Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.乳腺钼靶摄影:不同投照体位的比较
J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Apr;81(4):391-4.
10
The National Breast Screening Programme: the first 5,000 women screened in Northern Ireland.国家乳腺筛查计划:北爱尔兰首批接受筛查的5000名女性。
Ulster Med J. 1991 Oct;60(2):150-3.