Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Pain Physician. 2022 Oct;25(7):E1027-E1038.
For patients with lumbosacral contiguous double-level disc herniation, there has been no consensus on which level(s) should be treated. Selective nerve root block (SNRB) can identify the pain-generating nerve root; however, its diagnostic accuracy remains controversial due to potential spread of the injectate. Sequential SNRB from S1 to L5 may improve the diagnostic specificity.
To examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) assisted with sequential SNRB from S1 to L5 in patients who had lumbosacral contiguous double-level disc herniation.
A retrospective design was used.
This study was conducted in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.
Fifty-eight consecutive patients with lumbosacral contiguous double-level disc herniation were included (January 2018 to January 2021). Sequential SNRB from S1 to L5 was performed to identify the symptomatic level(s), followed by PELD based on the results of sequential SNRB. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified Macnab criteria. Pre- and post-operation radiologic and clinical parameters were evaluated. Demographics were retrieved from medical records.
Patients were followed-up with an average duration of 18.6 months. Among the 58 patients, 21 received surgical treatment at L4/L5 level, 25 at L5/S1 level, and 12 at both levels based on the results of sequential SNRB from S1 to L5. Compared with preoperative values, mean VAS scores for leg and back pain, as well as the ODI score, improved significantly after the surgery. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between patients receiving surgical treatment at L4/L5, L5/S1, or both levels. According to the Macnab criteria, 49 patients (84.5%) had excellent or good results.
This study used a retrospective design with relatively small sample size and medium follow-up duration.
Sequential SNRB from S1 to L5 was an effective approach to guide PELD treatment for patients with lumbosacral contiguous double-level disc herniation. Health care providers may consider using this approach to facilitate future clinical practice.
对于腰骶部连续双节段椎间盘突出症患者,尚未就应治疗哪些节段达成共识。选择性神经根阻滞(SNRB)可以确定产生疼痛的神经根;然而,由于注射剂的潜在扩散,其诊断准确性仍存在争议。从 S1 到 L5 进行连续 SNRB 可能会提高诊断的特异性。
检查腰骶部连续双节段椎间盘突出症患者经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)辅助 S1 至 L5 连续 SNRB 的临床和影像学结果。
回顾性设计。
本研究在上海的一家大学附属医院进行。
纳入 58 例腰骶部连续双节段椎间盘突出症患者(2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月)。进行 S1 至 L5 的连续 SNRB 以确定症状节段,然后根据连续 SNRB 的结果进行 PELD。临床结果通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和改良 Macnab 标准进行评估。评估术前和术后的影像学和临床参数。从病历中检索人口统计学资料。
患者平均随访 18.6 个月。58 例患者中,21 例在 L4/L5 水平接受手术治疗,25 例在 L5/S1 水平接受手术治疗,12 例在 S1 至 L5 连续 SNRB 的基础上在两个水平接受手术治疗。与术前相比,术后腿部和背部疼痛的 VAS 评分以及 ODI 评分均显著改善。在 L4/L5、L5/S1 或两个水平接受手术治疗的患者的临床结果之间没有显著差异。根据 Macnab 标准,49 例患者(84.5%)结果为优或良。
本研究采用回顾性设计,样本量较小,随访时间中等。
从 S1 到 L5 的连续 SNRB 是指导腰骶部连续双节段椎间盘突出症患者行 PELD 治疗的有效方法。医疗保健提供者可以考虑使用这种方法来促进未来的临床实践。