Suppr超能文献

噬菌体疗法的安全性与有效性:临床及安全性试验的系统评价

The Safety and Efficacy of Phage Therapy: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Safety Trials.

作者信息

Stacey Helen J, De Soir Steven, Jones Joshua D

机构信息

Public Health, Kings Cross Hospital, Clepington Road, Dundee DD3 8EA, UK.

Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Rue Bruyn, 1120 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;11(10):1340. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101340.

Abstract

Trials of phage therapy have not consistently reported efficacy. This contrasts with promising efficacy rates from a sizeable and compelling body of observational literature. This systematic review explores the reasons why many phage trials have not demonstrated efficacy. Four electronic databases were systematically searched for safety and/or efficacy trials of phage therapy. Sixteen trials of phage therapy were included, in which 378 patients received phage. These were divided into historical (pre-2000; N = 3; = 76) and modern (post-2000; N = 13; = 302) trials. All 13 modern trials concluded that phage therapy was safe. Six of the 13 modern trials were exclusively safety trials. Seven modern trials investigated both safety and efficacy; efficacy was observed in two. Two of three historical trials did not comment on safety, while adverse effects in the third likely reflected the use of phage preparations contaminated with bacterial debris. None of the historical trials contained evidence of efficacy. The evidence from trials is that phage therapy is safe. For efficacy to be observed a therapeutic amount of the right phage(s) must be delivered to the right place to treat infections containing enough susceptible bacterial cells. Trials that have not demonstrated efficacy have not fulfilled one or more elements of this principle.

摘要

噬菌体疗法的试验并未始终如一地报告其疗效。这与大量有说服力的观察性文献中显示出的可观疗效形成对比。本系统评价探讨了许多噬菌体试验未能证明其疗效的原因。系统检索了四个电子数据库,以查找噬菌体疗法的安全性和/或疗效试验。纳入了16项噬菌体疗法试验,其中378名患者接受了噬菌体治疗。这些试验分为历史试验(2000年以前;N = 3;76例)和现代试验(2000年以后;N = 13;302例)。所有13项现代试验均得出噬菌体疗法安全的结论。13项现代试验中有6项仅为安全性试验。7项现代试验同时研究了安全性和疗效;其中两项观察到了疗效。三项历史试验中有两项未对安全性发表评论,而第三项试验中的不良反应可能反映了使用了被细菌碎片污染的噬菌体制剂。历史试验中均没有疗效证据。试验证据表明噬菌体疗法是安全的。为了观察到疗效,必须将治疗量的合适噬菌体输送到合适的部位,以治疗含有足够易感细菌细胞的感染。未证明有疗效的试验未满足这一原则的一个或多个要素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/9598614/caf35e3cd5b8/antibiotics-11-01340-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验