Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Biomolecules. 2022 Sep 30;12(10):1400. doi: 10.3390/biom12101400.
The usefulness of serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (sACE) for diagnosing sarcoidosis and determining the active status of sarcoidosis has been reported with varying outcomes. On the basis of the majority of published data, we conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the overall predictive accuracy of sACE in sarcoidosis disease and the active status of sarcoidosis. The inclusion of related research listed in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and other literature databases was assessed. SROC curves were generated to characterize the overall test results after data on sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were combined. Publication bias was identified using Deeks' funnel plot. Thirty-five publications with 8645 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The following are summary estimates of sACE diagnostic performance for sarcoidosis: sensitivity, 60% (95% confidence interval (CI), 52-68%); specificity, 93% (95% CI, 88-96%); PLR, 8.4 (95% CI, 5.3-13.3); NLR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.36-0.52); and DOR, 19 (95% CI, 12-31). The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). Summary estimates for predicting the active status of sarcoidosis were as follows: sensitivity, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.87); specificity, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.90); PLR, 3.9 (95% CI, 2.1-7.3); NLR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17-0.49); and DOR, 13 (95% CI, 6-31). The AUC was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88). There was no evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis suggests that measuring the sACE may assist in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and predicting the active status of sarcoidosis, but the interpretation of the sACE results should be with caution. Future studies should validate our results.
血清血管紧张素转换酶(sACE)在诊断结节病和确定结节病的活动状态方面的有用性已有报道,但结果不一。基于大多数已发表的数据,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以计算 sACE 在结节病疾病和结节病活动状态中的总体预测准确性。评估了 Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus 和其他文献数据库中列出的相关研究。在综合灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)的数据后,生成 SROC 曲线来描述总体检测结果。采用 Deeks 漏斗图识别发表偏倚。符合纳入标准的 35 篇文献共纳入 8645 例患者。以下是 sACE 对结节病诊断性能的综合估计值:灵敏度为 60%(95%置信区间(CI),52-68%);特异性为 93%(95%CI,88-96%);PLR 为 8.4(95%CI,5.3-13.3);NLR 为 0.43(95%CI,0.36-0.52);DOR 为 19(95%CI,12-31)。SROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.84(95%CI,0.80-0.87)。预测结节病活动状态的综合估计值如下:灵敏度为 0.76(95%CI,0.61-0.87);特异性为 0.80(95%CI,0.64-0.90);PLR 为 3.9(95%CI,2.1-7.3);NLR 为 0.29(95%CI,0.17-0.49);DOR 为 13(95%CI,6-31)。AUC 为 0.85(95%CI,0.82-0.88)。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。我们的荟萃分析表明,测量 sACE 可能有助于结节病的诊断和预测结节病的活动状态,但应谨慎解释 sACE 结果。未来的研究应验证我们的结果。