Suppr超能文献

微创人工耳蜗植入手术:2010年与2020年专家意见

Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020.

作者信息

Topsakal Vedat, Agrawal Sumit, Atlas Marcus, Baumgartner Wolf-Dieter, Brown Kevin, Bruce Iain A, Dazert Stefan, Hagen Rudolf, Lassaletta Luis, Mlynski Robert, Raine Christopher H, Rajan Gunesh P, Schmutzhard Joachim, Sprinzl Georg Mathias, Staecker Hinrich, Usami Shin-Ichi, Van Rompaey Vincent, Zernotti Mario, Heyning Paul van de

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Jette, Belgium.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), University of Antwerp, 2610 Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 21;12(10):1551. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101551.

Abstract

This study aimed to discover expert opinion on the surgical techniques and materials most likely to achieve maximum postoperative residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and to determine how these opinions have changed since 2010. A previously published questionnaire used in a study published in 2010 was adapted and expanded. The questionnaire was distributed to an international group of experienced CI surgeons. Present results were compared, via descriptive statistics, to those from the 2010 survey. Eighteen surgeons completed the questionnaire. Respondents clearly favored the following: round window insertion, slow array insertion, and the peri- and postoperative use of systematic antibiotics. Insertion depth was regarded as important, and electrode arrays less likely to induce trauma were preferred. The usefulness of dedicated soft-surgery training was also recognized. A lack of agreement was found on whether the middle ear cavity should be flushed with a non-aminoglycoside antibiotic solution or whether a sheath or insertion tube should be used to avoid contaminating the array with blood or bone dust. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates how beliefs about CI soft surgery have changed since 2010 and shows areas of current consensus and disagreement.

摘要

本研究旨在了解专家对于在人工耳蜗(CI)手术中最有可能实现最大程度术后残余听力保留的手术技术和材料的看法,并确定自2010年以来这些看法有何变化。对2010年发表的一项研究中使用的一份先前已发表的问卷进行了改编和扩充。该问卷分发给了一组国际经验丰富的CI外科医生。通过描述性统计将当前结果与2010年调查的结果进行了比较。18名外科医生完成了问卷。受访者明确倾向于以下几点:圆窗插入、缓慢阵列插入以及围手术期和术后使用系统性抗生素。插入深度被认为很重要,并且更倾向于选用不太可能引起创伤的电极阵列。专门的软手术培训的有用性也得到了认可。对于中耳腔是否应使用非氨基糖苷类抗生素溶液冲洗,或者是否应使用护套或插入管以避免阵列被血液或骨屑污染,存在不同意见。总之,本文展示了自2010年以来关于CI软手术的观念如何变化,并显示了当前达成共识和存在分歧的领域。

相似文献

6
8
The rational for a mid-scala electrode array.中阶电极阵列的原理。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Jun;133 Suppl 1:S61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes.耳蜗大小对人工耳蜗植入效果的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 4;2019:5849871. doi: 10.1155/2019/5849871. eCollection 2019.
7
Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.电声刺激在儿童中的应用效果。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):849-857. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000658.
8
Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Surgery.保留听力的人工耳蜗植入手术
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;81:66-73. doi: 10.1159/000485544. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验