Stark Claire, Cunningham John, Turner Peter, Johnson Michael A, Bäcker Henrik C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia.
Epworth Richmond Hospital, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC 3021, Australia.
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 22;12(10):1558. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101558.
Smartphones and their associated applications are used frequently by patients and clinicians alike. Despite the technology being widely accessible, their use to aid in rehabilitation is yet to be adopted. The SARS CoV-2 pandemic has presented an opportunity to expedite their integration given the difficulty patients currently have in accessing healthcare. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature review on the use of smartphone rehabilitation applications compared to standard physiotherapy for back pain. We conducted a search of Medline/Pubmed and google databases using the search terms [APP] AND [[Orthopaedic] OR [Neurosurgery]], following the PRISMA guidelines. All prospective studies investigating rehabilitation applications for back pain or following spine surgery were included. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria which investigated 7636 patients, of which 92.4% were allocated to the interventional group ( = 7055/7636) with a follow up of 4 weeks to 6 months. All except one study reported on patients experiencing back pain on average for 19.6 ± 11.6 months. The VAS-pain score was presented in all studies without significance between the interventional and control group ( = 0.399 before and = 0.277 after intervention). Only one research group found significantly higher improvement in PROMs for the application group, whereas the remaining showed similar results compared to the control group. Using application-based rehabilitation programs provides an easily accessible alternative or substitute to traditional physiotherapy for patients with back pain. Given that smartphones are so prevalent in activities in our daily lives, this will enhance and improve rehabilitation if patients are self-dedicated and compliant.
患者和临床医生都经常使用智能手机及其相关应用程序。尽管这项技术广泛可得,但尚未将其用于辅助康复治疗。鉴于患者目前在获得医疗保健方面存在困难,新冠疫情为加速其整合提供了契机。本研究的目的是对使用智能手机康复应用程序与标准物理治疗治疗背痛的效果进行系统的文献综述。我们按照PRISMA指南,使用搜索词[应用程序] AND [[骨科] OR [神经外科]]在Medline/Pubmed和谷歌数据库中进行了搜索。纳入所有调查背痛或脊柱手术后康复应用程序的前瞻性研究。共有9项研究符合纳入标准,共调查了7636例患者,其中92.4%被分配到干预组(=7055/7636),随访时间为4周至6个月。除一项研究外,所有研究均报告患者平均背痛时间为19.6±11.6个月。所有研究均呈现了视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分,干预组和对照组之间无显著差异(干预前=0.399,干预后=0.277)。只有一个研究小组发现应用程序组的患者报告结局测量指标有显著更高的改善,而其余研究显示与对照组相比结果相似。对于背痛患者,使用基于应用程序的康复计划为传统物理治疗提供了一种易于获得的替代方案。鉴于智能手机在我们日常生活活动中如此普遍,如果患者有自我奉献精神且依从性好,这将增强和改善康复效果。