Khapte Pratapsingh S, Kumar Pradeep, Singh Akath, Wakchaure Goraksha C, Saxena Anurag, Sabatino Leo
ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413115, India.
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342003, India.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;11(20):2743. doi: 10.3390/plants11202743.
Protected cultivation is gaining momentum in (semi) arid regions to ameliorate the adverse environmental impacts on vegetable crops, besides ensuring high resource use efficiency in resource-limiting environments. Among the less techno-intensive protected cultivation structures, naturally ventilated polyhouses (NVP), insect-proof net houses (IPN) and shade net houses (SNH) are commercial structures in India. With the aim to find the best-protected structure, together with optimum irrigation level, for high yield and water productivity of the tomato crop, the most popular crop in hot arid regions, we evaluated tomato performance in low-tech protected structures (NVP, IPN and SNH) in interaction with three irrigation levels (100, 80 and 60% of crop evapotranspiration, ETc) during spring-summer of 2019 and 2020. The NVP was found superior to both the net house structures (IPN and SNH) for different performance indicators of tomatoes under investigation. The components of plant growth (leaf and stem dry mass) and fruit yield (fruit size, weight, yield), as well as fruit quality (total soluble solids, fruit dry matter and lycopene content) were higher in NVP, regardless of irrigation level. The yield as well as water productivity were significantly higher in NVP at 100% ETc. However, there was no statistical variation for water productivity between NVP and IPN. Microclimate parameters (temperature, relative humidity and photosynthetic active radiation) were markedly more congenial for tomato cultivation in NVP followed by IPN in relation to SNH. Consequently, plants' physiological functioning with higher leaf relative water content (RWC) and lower leaf water potential concomitantly with better photosynthetic efficiency (chlorophyll fluorescence, F/F), was in NVP and IPN. Most growth and yield attributes were depressed with the decrease in water application rates; hence, deficit irrigation in these low-tech protected structures is not feasible. For tomato cultivation in resource-scarce arid regions, the combination of the normal rate of irrigation (100% ETc) and NVP was optimal for gaining high yield as well as water productivity as compared to net houses.
在(半)干旱地区,保护性栽培正蓬勃发展,这不仅能减轻对蔬菜作物的不利环境影响,还能在资源有限的环境中确保高资源利用效率。在技术密集度较低的保护性栽培结构中,自然通风温室(NVP)、防虫网室(IPN)和遮阳网室(SNH)是印度的商业性结构。为了找到最适合的保护性结构以及最佳灌溉水平,以实现炎热干旱地区最受欢迎的作物——番茄的高产和水分生产率,我们在2019年和2020年春夏季评估了低技术保护性结构(NVP、IPN和SNH)中番茄在三种灌溉水平(作物蒸散量ETc的100%、80%和60%)相互作用下的表现。结果发现,在所研究的番茄不同性能指标方面,NVP优于两种网室结构(IPN和SNH)。无论灌溉水平如何,NVP中植物生长成分(叶片和茎干质量)、果实产量(果实大小、重量、产量)以及果实品质(总可溶性固形物、果实干物质和番茄红素含量)都更高。在100%ETc时,NVP的产量和水分生产率显著更高。然而,NVP和IPN之间的水分生产率没有统计学差异。小气候参数(温度、相对湿度和光合有效辐射)对番茄栽培而言,在NVP中明显更适宜,其次是IPN,SNH最差。因此,NVP和IPN中植物的生理功能表现为叶片相对含水量(RWC)较高、叶片水势较低,同时光合效率较好(叶绿素荧光,F/F)。随着灌水量的减少,大多数生长和产量属性都会降低;因此,在这些低技术保护性结构中进行亏缺灌溉是不可行的。对于资源稀缺的干旱地区的番茄种植,与网室相比,正常灌溉率(100%ETc)和NVP的组合对于获得高产和水分生产率而言是最佳的。