• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量城市公园可达性的公平性:来自成都的大数据分析。

Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu.

机构信息

College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Park City Center, China Southwest Geotechnical Investigation and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:1022666. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666
PMID:36299754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9590313/
Abstract

Spatial equality of parks is a significant issue in environmental justice studies. In cities with high-density development and limited land resources, this study uses a supply-demand adjusted two-step floating catchment area model (2SFCA), paying attention to residents' subjective preferences and psychological accessibility. It assesses equality of access to urban parks from two dimensions: spatial equality and quantitative equality at a fine scale of 100 × 100 m grid resolution. The spatial equality of urban parks in Chengdu is measured under different transportation modes (walking, cycling, and driving) based on multi-source geospatial big data and machine learning approaches. The results show: (1) There were significant differences in the spatial distribution of park accessibility under different modes of transportation. The spatial distribution under walking was significantly influenced by the park itself, while the distribution of rivers significantly influenced the spatial distribution under cycling and driving; (2) Accessibility to urban parks was almost universally equal in terms of driving, relatively equal in terms of cycling, and seriously unequal in terms of walking; (3) Spatial local autocorrelation analysis shows that park accessibility tended to be significantly clustered, with little spatial variation; and (4) The supply and demand of urban parks were relatively equal. The results can help urban planners to formulate effective strategies to alleviate spatial inequality more reasonably and precisely. The applied research methods can further improve the system of scientific evaluation from a new perspective.

摘要

公园空间公平性是环境正义研究中的一个重要问题。在高密度开发和土地资源有限的城市中,本研究采用供需调整的两步浮动集水面积模型(2SFCA),关注居民的主观偏好和心理可达性,从空间公平性和精细尺度(100×100m 网格分辨率)的数量公平性两个维度评估城市公园的可达性公平性。基于多源地理空间大数据和机器学习方法,利用不同的交通模式(步行、骑行和驾驶)来衡量成都市公园的空间公平性。结果表明:(1)在不同交通模式下,公园可达性的空间分布存在显著差异。步行模式下的空间分布受公园自身的显著影响,而骑行和驾驶模式下的空间分布则受到河流的显著影响;(2)驾驶出行的公园可达性几乎是完全公平的,骑行出行的可达性相对公平,而步行出行的可达性则严重不公平;(3)空间局部自相关分析表明,公园可达性具有明显的集聚趋势,空间变化较小;(4)城市公园的供需相对平衡。研究结果有助于城市规划者更合理、更精确地制定缓解空间不公平的有效策略。所应用的研究方法可以从新的角度进一步完善科学评价体系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/952a558ec028/fpubh-10-1022666-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/933aac5696fe/fpubh-10-1022666-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/ec2dda8a1314/fpubh-10-1022666-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/cc24bb5c6b38/fpubh-10-1022666-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/9359e966b6c0/fpubh-10-1022666-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/29addae866c7/fpubh-10-1022666-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/2c72fd076b26/fpubh-10-1022666-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/ac4b2bdd11bc/fpubh-10-1022666-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/24465bee9c61/fpubh-10-1022666-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/5747f51d92e0/fpubh-10-1022666-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/d3a6abeb768d/fpubh-10-1022666-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/47bbcd57a8a2/fpubh-10-1022666-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/952a558ec028/fpubh-10-1022666-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/933aac5696fe/fpubh-10-1022666-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/ec2dda8a1314/fpubh-10-1022666-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/cc24bb5c6b38/fpubh-10-1022666-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/9359e966b6c0/fpubh-10-1022666-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/29addae866c7/fpubh-10-1022666-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/2c72fd076b26/fpubh-10-1022666-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/ac4b2bdd11bc/fpubh-10-1022666-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/24465bee9c61/fpubh-10-1022666-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/5747f51d92e0/fpubh-10-1022666-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/d3a6abeb768d/fpubh-10-1022666-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/47bbcd57a8a2/fpubh-10-1022666-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18eb/9590313/952a558ec028/fpubh-10-1022666-g0012.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring equality in access to urban parks: A big data analysis from Chengdu.衡量城市公园可达性的公平性:来自成都的大数据分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:1022666. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022666. eCollection 2022.
2
[Using the environmental justice approach to evaluate equitable allocation of urban parks: A case study of main urban area of Nanjing, China].[运用环境正义方法评估城市公园的公平分配:以中国南京主城区为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jun;33(6):1589-1598. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.027.
3
An SCM-G2SFCA Model for Studying Spatial Accessibility of Urban Parks.用于研究城市公园空间可达性的 SCM-G2SFCA 模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010714.
4
Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Hierarchical Urban Parks by Multi-Types of Travel Distance in Shenzhen, China.中国深圳多类型出行距离的分层城市公园可达性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 22;16(6):1038. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061038.
5
Equity to Urban Parks for Elderly Residents: Perspectives of Balance between Supply and Demand.城市公园均等化服务于老年居民:供给与需求平衡视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;17(22):8506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228506.
6
Dynamic Changes in Community Deprivation of Access to Urban Green Spaces by Multiple Transport Modes.多种交通方式下城市绿地可达性的社区剥夺动态变化。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;9:615432. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.615432. eCollection 2021.
7
Measuring spatial accessibility and supply-demand deviation of urban green space: A mobile phone signaling data perspective.测量城市绿地的空间可达性和供需偏差:基于手机信令数据的视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;10:1029551. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029551. eCollection 2022.
8
Optimal site selection strategies for urban parks green spaces under the joint perspective of spatial equity and social equity.从空间公平性和社会公平性的联合视角优化城市公园绿地选址策略。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;12:1310340. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1310340. eCollection 2024.
9
Exploring Factors Affecting Urban Park Use from a Geospatial Perspective: A Big Data Study in Fuzhou, China.从地理空间视角探究影响城市公园使用的因素:以中国福州为例的大数据研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054237.
10
Accessibility of Park Green Space in Wuhan, China: Implications for Spatial Equity in the Post-COVID-19 Era.中国武汉城市公园绿地可达性:对后新冠疫情时代空间公平性的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095440.

引用本文的文献

1
The change of green space well-being during rapid urbanization: A case study in Jinan, China, 2006-2018.快速城市化进程中绿地福祉的变化:以中国济南为例,2006-2018 年。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0289480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289480. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the disparities in park accessibility through mobile phone data: Evidence from Fuzhou of China.利用手机数据探索公园可达性的差异:来自中国福州的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 1;281:111849. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111849. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region.暴露于自然空间、社区归属感与城市区域内不良心理健康结局的关系。
Environ Res. 2019 Apr;171:365-377. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.034. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Detailed Assessment of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Parks According to Day and Travel Mode Based on Web Mapping API: A Case Study of Main Parks in Wuhan.
基于 Web 地图 API 的城市公园时空分布的详细评估——以武汉市主要公园为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 11;15(8):1725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081725.
4
A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of daycare centers.一种基于通勤的两步浮动集水区法,用于测量日托中心的空间可达性。
Health Place. 2015 Mar;32:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Planning for health: a community-based spatial analysis of park availability and chronic disease across the lifespan.健康规划:基于社区的全生命周期公园可达性与慢性病空间分析
Health Place. 2014 May;27:102-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
6
Optimizing the two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility to medical clinics in Montreal.优化两步浮动集水区域法,以测量蒙特利尔医疗诊所的空间可达性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 11;11:166. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-166.
7
Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit.底特律都会区的黑人居住隔离、医疗设施空间获取差距和晚期乳腺癌诊断。
Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):1038-52. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
8
An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians.一种用于测量初级保健医生空间可达性的增强型两步浮动集水区(E2SFCA)方法。
Health Place. 2009 Dec;15(4):1100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
9
Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks.社区公园的规模、距离和特征与身体活动的关联
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1451-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129064. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
10
Heavy metal contaminants removal by soil washing.通过土壤淋洗去除重金属污染物。
J Hazard Mater. 1999 Dec 23;70(1-2):71-86. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00149-1.