Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
mBio. 2022 Dec 20;13(6):e0254022. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02540-22. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Airborne transmission in ferrets is a key component of pandemic risk assessment. However, some emerging avian influenza viruses transmit between ferrets but do not spread in humans. Therefore, we evaluated sequential rounds of airborne transmission as an approach to enhance the predictive accuracy of the ferret model. We reasoned that infection of ferrets via the respiratory route and onward transmission would more closely model transmission in humans. We hypothesized that pandemic and seasonal viruses would transmit efficiently over two rounds of transmission, while emerging avian viruses would fail to transmit in a second round. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pdm09) and seasonal H3N2 viruses were compared to avian-origin H7N9 and H3N8 viruses. Depending on the virus strain, transmission efficiency varied from 50 to 100% during the first round of transmission; the efficiency for each virus did not change during the second round, and viral replication kinetics in both rounds of transmission were similar. Both the H1N1pdm09 and H7N9 viruses acquired specific mutations during sequential transmission, while the H3N2 and H3N8 viruses did not; however, a global analysis of host-adaptive mutations revealed that minimal changes were associated with transmission of H1N1 and H3N2 viruses, while a greater number of changes occurred in the avian H3N8 and H7N9 viruses. Thus, influenza viruses that transmit in ferrets maintain their transmission efficiency through serial rounds of transmission. This answers the question of whether ferrets can propagate viruses through more than one round of airborne transmission and emphasizes that transmission in ferrets is necessary but not sufficient to infer transmissibility in humans. Airborne transmission in ferrets is used to gauge the pandemic potential of emerging influenza viruses; however, some emerging influenza viruses that transmit between ferrets do not spread between humans. Therefore, we evaluated sequential rounds of airborne transmission in ferrets as a strategy to enhance the predictive accuracy of the ferret model. Human influenza viruses transmitted efficiently (>83%) over two rounds of airborne transmission, demonstrating that, like humans, ferrets infected by the respiratory route can propagate the infection onward through the air. However, emerging avian influenza viruses with associated host-adaptive mutations also transmitted through sequential transmission. Thus, airborne transmission in ferrets is necessary but not sufficient to infer transmissibility in humans, and sequential transmission did not enhance pandemic risk assessment.
空气传播在评估流感大流行风险中是一个关键因素。然而,一些新兴的禽流感病毒在雪貂之间传播,但不会在人类中传播。因此,我们评估了连续几轮的空气传播,以提高雪貂模型的预测准确性。我们认为,通过呼吸道感染雪貂并进行传播,将更接近人类的传播方式。我们假设大流行和季节性病毒将在两轮传播中有效传播,而新兴的禽流感病毒将无法在第二轮传播中传播。我们比较了 2009 年大流行的 H1N1(pdm09)和季节性 H3N2 病毒,以及源自禽类的 H7N9 和 H3N8 病毒。根据病毒株的不同,在第一轮传播中,传播效率在 50%到 100%之间变化;每种病毒在第二轮传播中的效率没有变化,并且在两轮传播中的病毒复制动力学相似。在连续传播过程中,H1N1pdm09 和 H7N9 病毒都获得了特定的突变,而 H3N2 和 H3N8 病毒则没有;然而,对宿主适应性突变的全局分析表明,与 H1N1 和 H3N2 病毒的传播相关的变化很小,而在禽类 H3N8 和 H7N9 病毒中发生了更多的变化。因此,在雪貂中传播的流感病毒通过连续几轮的空气传播保持其传播效率。这回答了雪貂是否可以通过多轮空气传播来传播病毒的问题,并强调了雪貂中的传播是推断人类传播性所必需的,但不是充分的。空气传播在评估新兴流感病毒的大流行潜力方面被用来评估新兴流感病毒的大流行潜力;然而,一些在雪貂之间传播但不会在人类中传播的新兴流感病毒。因此,我们评估了雪貂中连续几轮的空气传播,作为提高雪貂模型预测准确性的策略。人类流感病毒在两轮空气传播中高效(>83%)传播,表明像人类一样,通过呼吸道感染的雪貂可以通过空气传播继续传播感染。然而,具有相关宿主适应性突变的新兴禽流感病毒也通过连续传播传播。因此,雪貂中的空气传播是推断人类传播性所必需的,但不是充分的,并且连续传播并没有增强大流行风险评估。