Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2195 Harrodsburg Rd., Suite 125, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA.
Department of Public Health, Hawaii Pacific University, Honolulu, HI, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options remains suboptimal in Black populations, contributing to screening disparities. Guided by community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, we partnered with five Black churches in Louisville, a region of Kentucky with high Black-white CRC screening disparities, to explore screening barriers and facilitators for CRC education and outreach. Project champions (n = 5) served as primary points of contact, developed project support within their churches, and were trained to recruit church and community members (n = 39) to participate in five semi-structured focus groups. Interview questions probed actual and perceived barriers to CRC screening, focusing on knowledge and perceptions of stool-based tests. Subsequent questions explored perceptions of different screening tests, CRC knowledge and beliefs, and trusted community locations for screening outreach. Transcripts were analyzed iteratively, and codes were derived inductively and refined to develop overarching themes. Participants experienced multilevel barriers to completing CRC screening. Primary themes about CRC screening included acknowledgment of importance, positive and negative personal experiences, need for increased outreach, and desire for greater cultural representation in educational materials. Participants frequently discussed perceptions of inadequate medical care, with most having only ever been offered colonoscopy; subsequently, knowledge of stool-based tests was low. To address this knowledge gap, participants stressed interpersonal communication from trusted individuals, such as local Black medical providers and CRC survivors. Given the low knowledge of stool-based testing among participants and identified inequities in receipt of clinical care, community-based CRC screening interventions are warranted to reduce Black-white CRC screening disparities.
黑人对结直肠癌(CRC)筛查选择的了解仍然欠佳,导致筛查存在差异。我们遵循社区参与式研究(CBPR)原则,与肯塔基州路易斯维尔的五所黑人教堂合作,该地区的黑人和白人之间的 CRC 筛查差异很大,旨在探讨 CRC 教育和外展的筛查障碍和促进因素。项目冠军(n=5)作为主要联络人,在各自的教堂内开展项目支持,并接受培训以招募教会和社区成员(n=39)参加五个半结构化焦点小组。访谈问题探讨了 CRC 筛查的实际和感知障碍,重点关注基于粪便的检测的知识和看法。随后的问题探讨了对不同筛查测试的看法、CRC 知识和信念,以及筛查外展的信任社区地点。对转录本进行了迭代分析,并从归纳法中得出代码并进行了改进,以形成总体主题。参与者在完成 CRC 筛查方面面临多层次的障碍。关于 CRC 筛查的主要主题包括对重要性的认识、积极和消极的个人经历、增加外展的需求,以及希望教育材料中能更多地体现文化代表性。参与者经常讨论对医疗保健不足的看法,大多数人只接受过结肠镜检查;因此,对粪便检测的了解很低。为了解决这一知识差距,参与者强调了来自可信赖的个人(如当地黑人医疗提供者和 CRC 幸存者)的人际沟通。鉴于参与者对基于粪便的检测的知识水平较低,以及在接受临床护理方面存在的不平等,需要开展基于社区的 CRC 筛查干预措施,以减少黑人和白人之间的 CRC 筛查差异。