• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.黑人群体在路易维尔居民中进行粪便筛查以检测结直肠癌的障碍和促进因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans.社区参与结直肠癌筛查教育:非裔美国人的焦点小组讨论。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02019-w. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
3
Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication.非裔美国教会成员的结直肠癌筛查:患者与医护人员沟通的定性和定量研究
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 15;4:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-62.
4
Addressing Low Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans: Using Focus Groups to Inform the Development of Effective Interventions.解决非裔美国人低水平的结直肠癌筛查问题:利用焦点小组来为有效干预措施的制定提供信息。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep;31(3):567-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0842-z.
5
Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.社区卫生工作者联合起来降低高危人群的结直肠癌和心血管疾病风险(CHURCH):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Apr 26;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08110-z.
6
Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify church leaders' perspectives on contextual determinants of community-based colorectal cancer screening for Black Kentuckians.运用实施研究的综合框架来确定教会领袖对肯塔基州黑人社区结直肠癌筛查背景决定因素的看法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 25;5(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00621-9.
7
Resident physicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening for African Americans.住院医师对非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Apr;102(4):303-11. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30602-7.
8
Assessing the effectiveness of a community health advisor plus screen to save educational intervention on stool-based testing adherence in an African American safety net clinic population: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial.评估社区卫生顾问加筛查对非裔美国人医疗服务提供系统人群基于粪便的检测依从性的教育干预效果:一项随机实用试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 15;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06076-4.
9
Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.系统评价增加非裔美国人粪便潜血结直肠癌筛查的干预措施。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.
10
Qualitative Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for African American and Hispanic Populations in Nebraska: an Application of the PRECEDE Framework.内布拉斯加州非裔美国人和西班牙裔人群结直肠癌筛查的定性分析:PRECEDE 框架的应用。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1767-1776. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02343-3. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a community health advisor colorectal cancer screening educational intervention on stool test completion in an African American primary care patient population: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.社区健康顾问结直肠癌筛查教育干预对非裔美国初级保健患者群体粪便检测完成情况的有效性:一项实用随机对照试验
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;3(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00168-4.
2
Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010 to 2018.2010年至2018年美国的居住隔离与结直肠癌筛查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 May 2;34(5):705-713. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424.
3
Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify church leaders' perspectives on contextual determinants of community-based colorectal cancer screening for Black Kentuckians.运用实施研究的综合框架来确定教会领袖对肯塔基州黑人社区结直肠癌筛查背景决定因素的看法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 25;5(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00621-9.
4
Attitudes and Experiential Factors Associated with Completion of mt-sDNA Test Kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening.与完成用于结直肠癌筛查的线粒体DNA检测试剂盒相关的态度和体验因素。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Nov 22;10:23743735231213765. doi: 10.1177/23743735231213765. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options - Data from a national survey.三种结直肠癌筛查方法的使用障碍——来自一项全国性调查的数据
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 29;24:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101508. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
A Subjective Culture Approach to Cancer Prevention: Rural Black and White Adults' Perceptions of Using Virtual Health Assistants to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening.一种预防癌症的主观文化方法:农村黑人和白人成年人对使用虚拟健康助手促进结直肠癌筛查的看法。
Health Commun. 2022 Aug;37(9):1123-1134. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1910166. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.黑白人群在结直肠癌筛查及筛查结局方面的差异:一项叙述性综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jan;30(1):3-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1537. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.系统评价增加非裔美国人粪便潜血结直肠癌筛查的干预措施。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.
5
Medical Mistrust and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans.非裔美国人的医疗不信任与结直肠癌筛查
J Community Health. 2017 Oct;42(5):1044-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0339-2.
6
Race, Medical Mistrust, and Segregation in Primary Care as Usual Source of Care: Findings from the Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities Study.种族、医疗不信任与作为常规医疗服务来源的初级保健中的隔离:综合社区健康差异探索研究的结果
J Urban Health. 2016 Jun;93(3):456-67. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0054-9.
7
Patterns of family health history communication among older African American adults.老年非裔美国成年人家庭健康史沟通模式。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):80-7. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.908984. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
8
Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.在服务不足人群中提高结直肠癌筛查率的粪便免疫化学试验外展、结肠镜外展与常规护理的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1725-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9294.
9
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.结直肠癌筛查的依从性:竞争策略的随机临床试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):575-82. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332.
10
Resident physicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening for African Americans.住院医师对非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Apr;102(4):303-11. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30602-7.

黑人群体在路易维尔居民中进行粪便筛查以检测结直肠癌的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2195 Harrodsburg Rd., Suite 125, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA.

Department of Public Health, Hawaii Pacific University, Honolulu, HI, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2
PMID:36301412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10501315/
Abstract

Knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options remains suboptimal in Black populations, contributing to screening disparities. Guided by community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, we partnered with five Black churches in Louisville, a region of Kentucky with high Black-white CRC screening disparities, to explore screening barriers and facilitators for CRC education and outreach. Project champions (n = 5) served as primary points of contact, developed project support within their churches, and were trained to recruit church and community members (n = 39) to participate in five semi-structured focus groups. Interview questions probed actual and perceived barriers to CRC screening, focusing on knowledge and perceptions of stool-based tests. Subsequent questions explored perceptions of different screening tests, CRC knowledge and beliefs, and trusted community locations for screening outreach. Transcripts were analyzed iteratively, and codes were derived inductively and refined to develop overarching themes. Participants experienced multilevel barriers to completing CRC screening. Primary themes about CRC screening included acknowledgment of importance, positive and negative personal experiences, need for increased outreach, and desire for greater cultural representation in educational materials. Participants frequently discussed perceptions of inadequate medical care, with most having only ever been offered colonoscopy; subsequently, knowledge of stool-based tests was low. To address this knowledge gap, participants stressed interpersonal communication from trusted individuals, such as local Black medical providers and CRC survivors. Given the low knowledge of stool-based testing among participants and identified inequities in receipt of clinical care, community-based CRC screening interventions are warranted to reduce Black-white CRC screening disparities.

摘要

黑人对结直肠癌(CRC)筛查选择的了解仍然欠佳,导致筛查存在差异。我们遵循社区参与式研究(CBPR)原则,与肯塔基州路易斯维尔的五所黑人教堂合作,该地区的黑人和白人之间的 CRC 筛查差异很大,旨在探讨 CRC 教育和外展的筛查障碍和促进因素。项目冠军(n=5)作为主要联络人,在各自的教堂内开展项目支持,并接受培训以招募教会和社区成员(n=39)参加五个半结构化焦点小组。访谈问题探讨了 CRC 筛查的实际和感知障碍,重点关注基于粪便的检测的知识和看法。随后的问题探讨了对不同筛查测试的看法、CRC 知识和信念,以及筛查外展的信任社区地点。对转录本进行了迭代分析,并从归纳法中得出代码并进行了改进,以形成总体主题。参与者在完成 CRC 筛查方面面临多层次的障碍。关于 CRC 筛查的主要主题包括对重要性的认识、积极和消极的个人经历、增加外展的需求,以及希望教育材料中能更多地体现文化代表性。参与者经常讨论对医疗保健不足的看法,大多数人只接受过结肠镜检查;因此,对粪便检测的了解很低。为了解决这一知识差距,参与者强调了来自可信赖的个人(如当地黑人医疗提供者和 CRC 幸存者)的人际沟通。鉴于参与者对基于粪便的检测的知识水平较低,以及在接受临床护理方面存在的不平等,需要开展基于社区的 CRC 筛查干预措施,以减少黑人和白人之间的 CRC 筛查差异。