• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Subjective Culture Approach to Cancer Prevention: Rural Black and White Adults' Perceptions of Using Virtual Health Assistants to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening.一种预防癌症的主观文化方法:农村黑人和白人成年人对使用虚拟健康助手促进结直肠癌筛查的看法。
Health Commun. 2022 Aug;37(9):1123-1134. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1910166. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Tailoring virtual human-delivered interventions: A digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for Black women.定制虚拟人传递干预措施:促进黑人女性结直肠癌筛查的数字干预措施。
Psychooncology. 2020 Dec;29(12):2048-2056. doi: 10.1002/pon.5538. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Key changes to improve social presence of a virtual health assistant promoting colorectal cancer screening informed by a technology acceptance model.基于技术接受模型,为提高虚拟健康助手在促进结直肠癌筛查方面的社会存在感而进行的关键改进。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01549-z.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.黑人群体在路易维尔居民中进行粪便筛查以检测结直肠癌的障碍和促进因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
A Pilot Study Examining the Efficacy of Delivering Colorectal Cancer Screening Messages via Virtual Health Assistants.一项通过虚拟健康助手传递结直肠癌筛查信息的疗效的初步研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication.非裔美国教会成员的结直肠癌筛查:患者与医护人员沟通的定性和定量研究
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 15;4:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-62.
7
Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by race and sex: Microsimulation analysis II to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.优化基于种族和性别的结直肠癌筛查:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的微模拟分析 II
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2974-2985. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31542. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans.社区参与结直肠癌筛查教育:非裔美国人的焦点小组讨论。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02019-w. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.沟通偏好会调节一种针对性干预措施对提高非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查率的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
10
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.实施意图与结直肠癌筛查:在安全网诊所进行的一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing mHealth Apps Through Community Engagement to Promote Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.通过社区参与实施移动健康应用程序以促进癌症筛查:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 16;13(10):1161. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101161.
2
From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.从英语到“多种英语变体”:提升文化定制癌症预防干预措施语言响应性的过程视角
J Particip Med. 2024 Dec 19;16:e57528. doi: 10.2196/57528.
3
Not just a Barbie in hijab: participant perspectives on culturally tailoring a virtual health assistant for Bangladeshi immigrants in the US promoting colorectal cancer screening.不仅仅是戴着头巾的芭比娃娃:参与者对为美国孟加拉移民量身定制虚拟健康助手以促进结直肠癌筛查的文化视角。
Mhealth. 2024 Oct 23;10:30. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-31. eCollection 2024.
4
Embodied Conversational Agents for Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review.具身对话代理在慢性病中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 9;26:e47134. doi: 10.2196/47134.
5
Can virtual human clinicians help close the gap in colorectal cancer screening for rural adults in the United States? The influence of rural identity on perceptions of virtual human clinicians.虚拟人类临床医生能否帮助缩小美国农村成年人在结直肠癌筛查方面的差距?农村身份对虚拟人类临床医生认知的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Oct 28;30:102034. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102034. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.黑人群体在路易维尔居民中进行粪便筛查以检测结直肠癌的障碍和促进因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review.教学代理的性别对学术学习的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Jun 20;5:862997. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.862997. eCollection 2022.
8
A Framework for Equitable Partnerships to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Settings.促进农村地区癌症预防与控制的公平伙伴关系框架。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Mar 2;6(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac017.
9
Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.沟通风险以促进结直肠癌筛查:一项多方法研究,以测试定制与靶向信息策略。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Mar 24;37(2):79-93. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac002.

本文引用的文献

1
How Structural Racism Works - Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities.结构性种族主义如何起作用——种族主义政策是美国种族健康不平等的根源
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):768-773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2025396. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
2
Tailoring virtual human-delivered interventions: A digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for Black women.定制虚拟人传递干预措施:促进黑人女性结直肠癌筛查的数字干预措施。
Psychooncology. 2020 Dec;29(12):2048-2056. doi: 10.1002/pon.5538. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前后美国结直肠癌筛查的差异
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;18(8):1796-1804.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.创建一款用于结直肠癌筛查的移动健康应用程序:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 8;6(2):e12700. doi: 10.2196/12700.
5
Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019.2019 年非裔美国人癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 May;69(3):211-233. doi: 10.3322/caac.21555. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
The strangest of all encounters: racial and ethnic discrimination in US health care.最奇怪的遭遇:美国医疗保健中的种族和族裔歧视。
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 May 8;33Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e00104416. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00104416.
7
The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.种族和种族一致性对医患沟通的影响:文献系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Feb;5(1):117-140. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0350-4. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
8
Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.客户与从业者对乳腺钼靶筛查体验的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12580. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
10
Randomized Trial of a Computerized Touch Screen Decision Aid to Increase Acceptance of Colonoscopy Screening in an African American Population with Limited Literacy.一项关于计算机触摸屏决策辅助工具的随机试验,旨在提高非洲裔美国低识字率人群对结肠镜检查筛查的接受度。
Health Commun. 2016 Oct;31(10):1291-300. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1069165. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

一种预防癌症的主观文化方法:农村黑人和白人成年人对使用虚拟健康助手促进结直肠癌筛查的看法。

A Subjective Culture Approach to Cancer Prevention: Rural Black and White Adults' Perceptions of Using Virtual Health Assistants to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Vilaro Melissa J, Wilson-Howard Danyell S, Neil Jordan M, Tavassoli Fatemeh, Zalake Mohan S, Lok Benjamin C, Modave François P, George Thomas J, Odedina Folakemi T, Carek Peter J, Mys Aubrey M, Krieger Janice L

机构信息

STEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida.

Chemistry, Bethune-Cookman University.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2022 Aug;37(9):1123-1134. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1910166. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2021.1910166
PMID:33876658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11232428/
Abstract

In the US, Black adults are less likely than White adults to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study uses a subjective culture approach to describe and compare perceptions of a CRC screening intervention delivered via virtual health assistants (VHAs) among rural Black and White study participants. We analyzed 28 focus groups with Black ( = 85) and White ( = 69) adults aged 50-73. Participants, largely recruited through community engagement efforts, tested the VHA intervention on mobile phones provided by the research team. Moderated discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. All groups preferred the VHA to be friendly. Other important cues included trustworthiness, authority, and expertise. Black participants expressed a preference for receiving information about their CRC risk from the VHA compared with White adults. Black participants also expressed the importance of sharing the intervention and the CRC screening messages with younger members of their networks, including family members who could benefit from screening messages before reaching the recommended age for screening. The key similarities and differences between Black and White adults' perceptions of the intervention that were identified in this study can help inform future efforts to develop effective communication strategies and reduce cancer screening inequities.

摘要

在美国,与白人成年人相比,黑人成年人接受结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的可能性较小。本研究采用主观文化方法,描述和比较农村黑人和白人研究参与者对通过虚拟健康助手(VHA)提供的CRC筛查干预措施的看法。我们分析了28个焦点小组,参与者为年龄在50至73岁之间的黑人(n = 85)和白人(n = 69)成年人。参与者主要通过社区参与活动招募而来,他们在研究团队提供的手机上测试了VHA干预措施。使用主题分析法对经过主持的讨论进行记录、转录和分析。所有小组都希望VHA友善。其他重要因素包括可信度、权威性和专业知识。与白人成年人相比,黑人参与者表示更倾向于从VHA获得有关其CRC风险的信息。黑人参与者还强调了与社交网络中的年轻成员,包括那些在达到推荐筛查年龄之前就能从筛查信息中受益的家庭成员,分享干预措施和CRC筛查信息的重要性。本研究中确定的黑人和白人成年人对干预措施看法的关键异同,有助于为未来制定有效的沟通策略和减少癌症筛查不平等现象的努力提供参考。