Hisatake Shinji, Ikeda Takanori, Fukuda Ikuo, Nakamura Mashio, Yamada Norikazu, Takayama Morimasa, Maeda Hideaki, Yamashita Takeshi, Mo Makoto, Yamazaki Tsutomu, Okumura Yasuo, Hirayama Atsushi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Keimeikai Yokawa Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Circ Rep. 2022 Sep 13;4(10):490-498. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0082. eCollection 2022 Oct 7.
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear. In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, a multicenter prospective observational study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE according to unprovoked (n=388) or provoked (n=557) VTE status. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Compared with patients in the provoked group, patients in the unprovoked group were younger, less likely to be female, and had higher body weight. The incidence of symptomatic VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the unprovoked than provoked VTE group (3.54% vs. 1.77% per patient-year; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding events between rivaroxaban-treated patients with unprovoked and provoked VTE (2.31% vs. 3.75% per patient-year; P=0.289). Although the proportion of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m who were non-users of antiplatelet agents was higher in the unprovoked VTE group, there was no interaction effect (BMI: 4.58% vs. 1.55% per patient-year [P=0.040; P for interaction=0.361]; concomitant antiplatelet agent non-users: 3.65% vs. 1.72% per patient-year [P=0.028; P for interaction=0.627]). This subanalysis suggests the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE. In such patients, DOAC discontinuation should be considered carefully, particularly in those not using antiplatelet agents and those with a high BMI.
直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在不明原因静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。在这项J'xactly研究的亚分析中,这是一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究,我们根据不明原因(n = 388)或诱因明确(n = 557)的VTE状态,评估了利伐沙班在急性VTE患者中的安全性和有效性。中位随访时间为21.2个月。与诱因明确组的患者相比,不明原因组的患者更年轻,女性比例更低,体重更高。不明原因VTE组有症状的VTE复发发生率显著高于诱因明确的VTE组(每年每位患者3.54% 对1.77%;P = 0.032)。在接受利伐沙班治疗的不明原因和诱因明确的VTE患者中,大出血事件的发生率没有显著差异(每年每位患者2.31% 对3.75%;P = 0.289)。虽然不明原因VTE组中体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/m²且未使用抗血小板药物的患者比例更高,但不存在交互作用(BMI:每年每位患者4.58% 对1.55% [P = 0.040;交互作用P = 0.361];未使用抗血小板药物者:每年每位患者3.65% 对1.72% [P = 0.028;交互作用P = 0.627])。这项亚分析表明利伐沙班在不明原因VTE患者中的安全性和有效性。对于此类患者,应谨慎考虑停用DOAC,尤其是那些未使用抗血小板药物和BMI较高的患者。