• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诱发性与非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞:来自GARFIELD-VTE研究的结果

Provoked versus unprovoked venous thromboembolism: Findings from GARFIELD-VTE.

作者信息

Ageno Walter, Farjat Alfredo, Haas Sylvia, Weitz Jeffrey I, Goldhaber Samuel Z, Turpie Alexander G G, Goto Shinya, Angchaisuksiri Pantep, Dalsgaard Nielsen Joern, Kayani Gloria, Schellong Sebastian, Bounameaux Henri, Mantovani Lorenzo G, Prandoni Paolo, Kakkar Ajay K

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Insubria Varese Italy.

Thrombosis Research Institute London UK.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Feb 20;5(2):326-341. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12482. eCollection 2021 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/rth2.12482
PMID:33733032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7938631/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has a long-term risk of recurrence, dependent on the presence or absence of provoking risk factors at the time of the event.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical characteristics, anticoagulant patterns, and 12-month outcomes in patients with transient provoking factors, active cancer, and unprovoked VTE.

METHODS

The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD)-VTE is a prospective, observational study that enrolled 10 207 patients with objectively diagnosed VTE from 415 sites in 28 countries.

RESULTS

Patients with transient provoking factors were younger (53.0 years) and more frequently women (61.2%) than patients with unprovoked VTE (60.3 years; 43.0% women) or active cancer (63.6 years; 51.7% women). After 6 months, 59.1% of patients with transient provoking factors remained on anticoagulation, compared to 71.3% with unprovoked VTE and 47.3% with active cancer. At 12 months, this decreased to 36.7%, 51.5%, and 25.4%, respectively. The risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.62), recurrent VTE (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62-1.14), and major bleeding (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86-1.85) was comparable in patients with transient provoking factors and unprovoked VTE. Patients with minor and major transient provoking factors had a similar risk of recurrent VTE (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.59-1.66), but those with major transient risk factors had a lower risk of death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98).

CONCLUSION

At 1 year, nearly 40% of patients with transient provoking factors and slightly over half of patients with unprovoked VTE were on anticoagulant treatment. Event rates were comparable between the two groups. Risk of death was higher in patients with minor transient factors than in those with major transient factors.

摘要

引言

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)具有复发的长期风险,这取决于事件发生时是否存在诱发风险因素。

目的

比较有短暂诱发因素、活动性癌症和无诱因VTE患者的临床特征、抗凝模式及12个月的结局。

方法

FIELD全球抗凝注册研究(GARFIELD)-VTE是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了来自28个国家415个地点的10207例经客观诊断为VTE的患者。

结果

有短暂诱发因素的患者比无诱因VTE患者(60.3岁;43.0%为女性)或活动性癌症患者(63.6岁;51.7%为女性)更年轻(53.0岁),且女性比例更高(61.2%)。6个月后,有短暂诱发因素的患者中59.1%仍在接受抗凝治疗,无诱因VTE患者为71.3%,活动性癌症患者为47.3%。在12个月时,这一比例分别降至36.7%、51.5%和25.4%。有短暂诱发因素的患者与无诱因VTE患者的死亡率(风险比[HR],1.21;95%置信区间[CI],0.90-1.62)、复发性VTE(HR,0.84;95%CI,0.62-1.14)和大出血(HR,1.26;95%CI,0.86-1.85)风险相当。有轻微和严重短暂诱发因素的患者复发性VTE风险相似(HR,0.99;95%CI,0.59-1.66),但有严重短暂风险因素的患者死亡风险较低(HR,0.61;95%CI,0.38-0.98)。

结论

1年时,近40%有短暂诱发因素的患者和略超过一半无诱因VTE患者正在接受抗凝治疗。两组的事件发生率相当。有轻微短暂因素的患者死亡风险高于有严重短暂因素的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/be544b456fc3/RTH2-5-326-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/5aa2b5748df5/RTH2-5-326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/a45b2ccd6b9e/RTH2-5-326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/872b9c4d8280/RTH2-5-326-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/29674fccf173/RTH2-5-326-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/69cf4f150aac/RTH2-5-326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/be544b456fc3/RTH2-5-326-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/5aa2b5748df5/RTH2-5-326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/a45b2ccd6b9e/RTH2-5-326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/872b9c4d8280/RTH2-5-326-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/29674fccf173/RTH2-5-326-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/69cf4f150aac/RTH2-5-326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c6f/7938631/be544b456fc3/RTH2-5-326-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Provoked versus unprovoked venous thromboembolism: Findings from GARFIELD-VTE.诱发性与非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞:来自GARFIELD-VTE研究的结果
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Feb 20;5(2):326-341. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12482. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis.首次无诱因静脉血栓栓塞事件停止抗凝治疗后症状性复发性静脉血栓栓塞的长期风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 24;366:l4363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4363.
3
The influence of anemia on clinical outcomes in venous thromboembolism: Results from GARFIELD-VTE.贫血对静脉血栓栓塞症临床结局的影响:来自GARFIELD-VTE研究的结果
Thromb Res. 2021 Jul;203:155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with HIV infection: A nationwide cohort study.HIV 感染者复发性静脉血栓栓塞的风险:一项全国性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 May 14;17(5):e1003101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003101. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Comparing U.S. and Canadian treatment patterns on venous thromboembolism outcomes in the GARFIELD-VTE registry.比较 GARFIELD-VTE 注册研究中美加三国静脉血栓栓塞结局的治疗模式。
Thromb Res. 2023 Dec;232:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Sex-specific differences in the presentation, clinical course, and quality of life of patients with acute venous thromboembolism according to baseline risk factors. Insights from the PREFER in VTE.根据基线风险因素,急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者的临床表现、临床病程和生活质量存在性别差异。来自 PREFER in VTE 的见解。
Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Jun;88:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Assessment of Outcomes Among Patients With Venous Thromboembolism With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease.静脉血栓栓塞症伴或不伴慢性肾脏病患者结局的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022886. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22886.
8
Secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism after initial oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.初发性无诱因静脉血栓栓塞症患者初始口服抗凝治疗后复发性静脉血栓栓塞症的二级预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011088.pub2.
9
Long-term risk of recurrence in patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism managed according to d-dimer results; A cohort study.根据 D-二聚体检测结果管理的首次无诱因静脉血栓栓塞症患者的长期复发风险:一项队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jul;17(7):1144-1152. doi: 10.1111/jth.14458. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
36-month clinical outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism: GARFIELD-VTE.静脉血栓栓塞症患者的36个月临床结局:加菲猫-VTE研究。
Thromb Res. 2023 Feb;222:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.11.016. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriate target range of INR and predictive factors of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on warfarin.华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者的国际标准化比值(INR)适宜目标范围及复发血栓形成和出血的预测因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08229-2.
2
Temporal trend in venous thromboembolism hospitalization rates in Brazil.巴西静脉血栓栓塞住院率的时间趋势。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Mar 31;71(2):e20240608. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240608. eCollection 2025.
3
Chordoma combined with Trousseau syndrome: a case report and literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
How I assess and manage the risk of bleeding in patients treated for venous thromboembolism.我如何评估和管理接受静脉血栓栓塞治疗患者的出血风险。
Blood. 2020 Mar 5;135(10):724-734. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001605.
2
Prediction of recurrent venous thrombosis in all patients with a first venous thrombotic event: The Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction model (L-TRRiP).首次静脉血栓栓塞事件后所有患者复发性静脉血栓的预测:莱顿血栓复发风险预测模型(L-TRRiP)。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 11;16(10):e1002883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002883. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS).
脊索瘤合并特鲁索综合征:一例报告及文献复习
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):6249-6262. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1232. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Biomarkers Profile in Provoked Unprovoked Deep Venous Thrombosis.诱发型与非诱发型深静脉血栓的生物标志物谱。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241238211. doi: 10.1177/10760296241238211.
5
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Treatment, and Risk Assessment.癌症相关血栓形成:流行病学、病理生理机制、治疗及风险评估
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Dec 26;17:11795549231220297. doi: 10.1177/11795549231220297. eCollection 2023.
7
Provoked vs minimally provoked vs unprovoked VTE: does it matter?有诱因的与微诱因的与无诱因的 VTE:这有关系吗?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):600-605. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000492.
8
How to diagnose and manage antiphospholipid syndrome.如何诊断和治疗抗磷脂综合征。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):606-613. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000493.
9
Extended anticoagulation for VTE: what evidence justifies it?静脉血栓栓塞症的延长抗凝治疗:何种证据能证明其合理性?
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1241979. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1241979. eCollection 2023.
10
Exploring the Clinical Efficacy of Venous Thromboembolism Management in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: An Insight into Patient Outcomes.探索沙特阿拉伯医院静脉血栓栓塞管理的临床疗效:对患者预后的洞察
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 31;13(4):612. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040612.
2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)合作制定的急性肺栓塞诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.
4
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)合作制定的急性肺栓塞诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性肺栓塞诊断和管理特别工作组。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 9;54(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01647-2019. Print 2019 Sep.
5
Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Perspectives from the GARFIELD-VTE Registry.孤立性远端深静脉血栓形成:来自 GARFIELD-VTE 登记研究的观点。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct;119(10):1675-1685. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693461. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Anticoagulation therapy patterns for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism in GARFIELD-VTE patients.GARFIELD-VTE 患者急性治疗静脉血栓栓塞症的抗凝治疗模式。
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct;17(10):1694-1706. doi: 10.1111/jth.14548. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Let's Stop Dichotomizing Venous Thromboembolism as Provoked or Unprovoked.让我们停止将静脉血栓栓塞症划分为诱因明确型或诱因不明型。
Circulation. 2018 Dec 4;138(23):2591-2593. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036548.
8
Current practice patterns and patient persistence with anticoagulant treatments for cancer-associated thrombosis.癌症相关血栓形成的抗凝治疗的当前实践模式及患者依从性
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 May 30;1(1):14-22. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12002. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to baseline risk factor profiles.根据基线风险因素特征评估复发静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
Blood Adv. 2018 Apr 10;2(7):788-796. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017160.
10
Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism after unprovoked pulmonary embolism: the PADIS-PE randomised trial.特发性肺栓塞后复发性静脉血栓栓塞的风险因素:PADIS-PE 随机试验。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jan 4;51(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01202-2017. Print 2018 Jan.