Stoyanov Drozdstoy
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology and Research Institute, Plovdiv Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 10;13:999680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.999680. eCollection 2022.
Translational validity (or trans-disciplinary validity) is defined as one possible approach to achieving incremental validity by combining simultaneous clinical state-dependent measures and functional MRI data acquisition. It is designed under the assumption that the simultaneous administration of the two methods may produce a dataset with enhanced synchronization and concordance. Translational validation aims at "bridging" the explanatory gap by implementing validated psychometric tools clinically in the experimental settings of fMRI and then translating them back to clinical utility. Our studies may have identified common diagnostic task-specific denominators in terms of activations and network modulation. However, those common denominators need further investigation to determine whether they signify disease or syndrome-specific features (signatures), which, at the end of the day, raises one more question about the poverty of current conventional psychiatric classification criteria. We propose herewith a novel algorithm for translational validation based on our explorative findings. The algorithm itself includes pre-selection of a test based on its psychometric characteristics, adaptation to the functional MRI paradigm, exploration of the underpinning whole brain neural correlates in healthy controls as compared to a patient population with certain diagnoses, and finally, investigation of the differences between two or more diagnostic classes.
转化效度(或跨学科效度)被定义为一种通过结合同步的临床状态依赖测量和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据采集来实现递增效度的可能方法。它是在两种方法同时应用可能产生具有增强同步性和一致性的数据集这一假设下设计的。转化验证旨在通过在fMRI实验环境中临床应用经过验证的心理测量工具,然后将其转化为临床效用,来“弥合”解释性差距。我们的研究可能已经在激活和网络调节方面确定了常见的特定诊断任务分母。然而,这些共同分母需要进一步研究,以确定它们是否表示疾病或综合征特异性特征(特征),归根结底,这又引发了一个关于当前传统精神病学分类标准匮乏的问题。我们在此根据探索性研究结果提出一种用于转化验证的新算法。该算法本身包括基于心理测量特征对测试进行预筛选、使其适应功能磁共振成像范式、与患有特定诊断的患者群体相比探索健康对照中潜在的全脑神经相关性,最后,研究两个或更多诊断类别之间的差异。