• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直播内容类型如何影响观众的支持行为?基于心理和社会满足感的中介分析。

How live stream content types impact viewers' support behaviors? Mediational analysis on psychological and social gratifications.

作者信息

Mao Eric

机构信息

School of Cultural Creativity and Management, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:951055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951055. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951055
PMID:36304865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9596137/
Abstract

While previous research into live streaming was predominantly focused on video games, its content creation and provision has tremendously evolved, extending well-beyond game streams. Contents of general interest, such as e-commerce shopping, talent shows, and cute pets, started to prevail in today's landscape of live streaming. However, limited attention has been given to how distinct types of streaming contents influence viewers' psychological and behavioral responses. To fill this void, we employed an online survey ( = 583) to empirically examine the associations between popular live stream content types on (i.e., the app for China) and their viewers' psychological and social gratifications and typical support behaviors. The results revealed that gratifications varied drastically across different content types. Game streaming, in particular, generated significant indirect impacts on all the support behaviors under consideration. On the other hand, whereas tension release served as a consistent mediator, the cognitive needs had no significant mediation effects. In sum, our study makes theoretical contributions to the literature by analyzing the thriving live stream phenomenon from a uses and gratifications perspective. We help augment the understanding of new media users' preferences and choices in an attention economy, wherein human attention is conceptualized as a scarce resource. In practice, a better knowledge of viewer needs can facilitate streamers to customize their content creation and provision so as to accentuate elements of interest and elicit desired support behaviors (i.e., monetization opportunities).

摘要

虽然先前对直播的研究主要集中在视频游戏上,但其内容创作和提供方式已经发生了巨大的演变,远远超出了游戏直播的范畴。诸如电子商务购物、才艺表演和可爱宠物等大众感兴趣的内容,开始在当今的直播领域占据主导地位。然而,对于不同类型的直播内容如何影响观众的心理和行为反应,人们给予的关注却很有限。为了填补这一空白,我们开展了一项在线调查(n = 583),以实证研究抖音(即中国的抖音应用程序)上流行的直播内容类型与其观众的心理和社会满足感以及典型支持行为之间的关联。结果显示,不同内容类型的满足感差异很大。特别是游戏直播,对所有考虑中的支持行为都产生了显著的间接影响。另一方面,虽然紧张释放起到了一致的中介作用,但认知需求并没有显著的中介效应。总之,我们的研究从使用与满足的角度分析了蓬勃发展的直播现象,为该领域的文献做出了理论贡献。在将人类注意力概念化为稀缺资源的注意力经济中,我们有助于加深对新媒体用户偏好和选择的理解。在实践中,更好地了解观众需求可以帮助主播定制他们的内容创作和提供方式,从而突出有趣的元素并引发期望的支持行为(即盈利机会)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9957/9596137/c78fa22bd6ee/fpsyg-13-951055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9957/9596137/c78fa22bd6ee/fpsyg-13-951055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9957/9596137/c78fa22bd6ee/fpsyg-13-951055-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How live stream content types impact viewers' support behaviors? Mediational analysis on psychological and social gratifications.直播内容类型如何影响观众的支持行为?基于心理和社会满足感的中介分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:951055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951055. eCollection 2022.
2
Antecedents of Viewers' Live Streaming Watching: A Perspective of Social Presence Theory.观众观看直播的前因:社会临场感理论视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:839629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.839629. eCollection 2022.
3
An Exploration of Mental Health Discussions in Live Streaming Gaming Communities.对直播游戏社区中心理健康讨论的探索
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:575653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.575653. eCollection 2021.
4
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers' Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations.谁在中国观看网络直播?审视观众的行为、性格特征及动机。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 4;11:1607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01607. eCollection 2020.
5
Gift-giving intentions in pan-entertainment live streaming: Based on social exchange theory.泛娱乐直播中的送礼意图:基于社会交换理论。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0296908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296908. eCollection 2024.
6
Understanding gift-giving in game live streaming on Douyu: An evaluation of PSR/social presence.解读斗鱼游戏直播中的礼物赠送行为:对临场感/社交临场感的评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:953484. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953484. eCollection 2022.
7
The effects of live streamer's expertise and entertainment on the viewers' purchase and follow intentions.直播者的专业知识和娱乐性对观众购买及关注意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 20;15:1383736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1383736. eCollection 2024.
8
Why do female audiences subscribe to these types of streamers? An empirical study on the motivations of Chinese Huya users.为什么女性观众会订阅这类主播?一项关于中国虎牙用户动机的实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 28;14:1247451. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247451. eCollection 2023.
9
Do Psychological Ownership and Communicative Presence Matter? Examining How User-Generated Content in E-Commerce Live Streaming Influences Consumers' Purchase Intention.心理所有权和社交临场感重要吗?探究电子商务直播中的用户生成内容如何影响消费者的购买意愿。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 11;14(8):696. doi: 10.3390/bs14080696.
10
How Video Streamers' Mental Health Disclosures Affect Viewers' Risk Perceptions.视频主播心理健康披露如何影响观众的风险认知。
Health Commun. 2021 Dec;36(14):1931-1941. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1808405. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The antecedents of customer satisfaction in the live-streaming commerce of green agricultural products.绿色农产品直播电商中顾客满意度的前置因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0305527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305527. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual reality adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic: A uses and gratifications perspective.新冠疫情期间虚拟现实技术的应用:使用与满足视角
Telemat Inform. 2021 Dec;65:101728. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101728. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Live Streams on Twitch Help Viewers Cope With Difficult Periods in Life.Twitch上的直播帮助观众应对生活中的困难时期。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:586975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586975. eCollection 2020.
3
Why Are People Loyal to Live Stream Channels? The Perspectives of Uses and Gratifications and Media Richness Theories.
为什么人们对直播频道忠诚?使用与满足理论和媒体丰富度理论的视角。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 May;23(5):351-356. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0547. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Moderating effects of information-oriented versus escapism-oriented motivations on the relationship between psychological well-being and problematic use of video game live-streaming services.调节信息导向与逃避导向动机对心理幸福感与游戏直播服务问题使用之间关系的影响。
J Behav Addict. 2019 Sep 1;8(3):564-573. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.34. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults.在英国成年人中,积极的身体形象与享乐(情感)幸福以及心理(心理和社会)幸福呈正相关。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):541-552. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Online social integration is associated with reduced mortality risk.在线社交融入与降低死亡风险相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):12980-12984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605554113. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Reasons for playing casual video games and perceived benefits among adults 18 to 80 years old.18 至 80 岁成年人玩休闲视频游戏的原因和感知益处。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Dec;16(12):892-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0705. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
8
When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: the role of recognition and moral identity internalization.当道德认同象征化激发亲社会行为时:认可和道德认同内化的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):759-70. doi: 10.1037/a0033177. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
Games at work: the recreational use of computer games during working hours.工作时玩游戏:工作时间内对电脑游戏的消遣性使用。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):461-5. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0010.
10
Social consequences of disparagement humor: a prejudiced norm theory.贬低性幽默的社会后果:一种偏见规范理论。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(1):79-94. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4.