• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CellaVision DC-1 数字形态分析仪的性能。

Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Oct 31;61(1):133-141. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0829. Print 2023 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2022-0829
PMID:36306547
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

CellaVision DC-1 (DC-1, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) is a newly launched digital morphology analyzer that was developed mainly for small to medium-volume laboratories. We evaluated the precision, qualitative performance, comparison of cell counts between DC-1 and manual counting, and turnaround time (TAT) of DC-1.

METHODS

Using five peripheral blood smear (PBS) slides spanning normal white blood cell (WBC) range, precision and qualitative performance of DC-1 were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3, EP15-Ed3-IG1, and EP12-A2 guidelines. Cell counts of DC-1 and manual counting were compared according to the CLSI EP 09C-ED3 guidelines, and TAT of DC-1 was also compared with TAT of manual counting.

RESULTS

DC-1 showed excellent precision (%CV, 0.0-3.5%), high specificity (98.9-100.0%), and high negative predictive value (98.4-100.0%) in 18 cell classes (12 WBC classes and six non-WBC classes). However, DC-1 showed 0% of positive predictive value in seven cell classes (metamyelocytes, myelocytes, promyelocytes, blasts, plasma cells, nucleated red blood cells, and unidentified). The largest absolute mean differences (%) of DC-1 vs. manual counting was 2.74. Total TAT (min:s) was comparable between DC-1 (8:55) and manual counting (8:55).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that comprehensively evaluated the performance of DC-1 including its TAT. DC-1 has a reliable performance that can be used in small to medium-volume laboratories for assisting PBS review. However, DC-1 may make unnecessary workload for cell verification in some cell classes.

摘要

目的

CellaVision DC-1(DC-1,希森美康,神户,日本)是一种新推出的数字形态分析仪,主要为中小容量实验室开发。我们评估了 DC-1 的精密度、定性性能、与手动计数的细胞计数比较以及周转时间(TAT)。

方法

使用五个外周血涂片(PBS)跨越正常白细胞(WBC)范围,根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)EP15-A3、EP15-Ed3-IG1 和 EP12-A2 指南评估 DC-1 的精密度和定性性能。根据 CLSI EP 09C-ED3 指南比较 DC-1 和手动计数的细胞计数,并比较 DC-1 的 TAT 与手动计数的 TAT。

结果

DC-1 在 18 个细胞类别(12 个 WBC 类别和 6 个非 WBC 类别)中显示出优异的精密度(%CV,0.0-3.5%)、高特异性(98.9-100.0%)和高阴性预测值(98.4-100.0%)。然而,DC-1 在七个细胞类别中显示 0%的阳性预测值(中幼粒细胞、幼粒细胞、早幼粒细胞、原始细胞、浆细胞、有核红细胞和未识别)。DC-1 与手动计数的最大绝对平均差异(%)为 2.74。DC-1(8:55)和手动计数(8:55)的总 TAT(分钟:秒)相当。

结论

这是第一项全面评估 DC-1 包括其 TAT 的性能的研究。DC-1 具有可靠的性能,可用于中小容量实验室协助 PBS 复查。然而,在某些细胞类别中,DC-1 可能会产生不必要的细胞验证工作量。

相似文献

1
Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.CellaVision DC-1 数字形态分析仪的性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Oct 31;61(1):133-141. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0829. Print 2023 Jan 27.
2
Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.Sysmex DI-60 全自动数字形态学分析仪与人工镜检在白细胞减少症样本中的白细胞分类比较:风险和周转时间的评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.398.
3
Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.两种自动化数字形态分析仪在恶性血液病患者白细胞分类中的性能比较:迈瑞 MC-80 和希森美康 DI-60。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2024 Jun;46(3):457-465. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14227. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Performance of the CellaVision DC-1 digital cell imaging analyser for differential counting and morphological classification of blood cells.CellaVision DC-1 数字细胞成像分析仪在血细胞差异计数和形态学分类方面的性能。
J Clin Pathol. 2023 Mar;76(3):194-201. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207863. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.Sysmex DI-60自动数字细胞成像分析仪的性能
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Nov 27;56(1):94-102. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0132.
6
Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.数字形态分析仪 Vision Pro 在白细胞分类中的性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jan 20;59(6):1099-1106. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1701. Print 2021 May 26.
7
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.新自动化数字细胞形态分析仪 Mindray MC-80 的白细胞分类性能。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2023 Oct;45(5):691-699. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14119. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在体液细胞分类计数中的分析性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0288551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288551. eCollection 2023.
9
Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在异常样本白细胞分类中的性能评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65427-0.
10
Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?Sysmex DI-60的性能评估:数字形态分析仪对体液中白细胞分类是否可靠?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(6):592. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060592.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diagnostic Performance of the Cellavision DC-1 Digital Morphology Analyser on Leukaemia Samples.Cellavision DC-1数字形态分析仪对白血病样本的诊断性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;15(16):2029. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162029.
2
Evaluation of MC-80 automatic blood cell morphology analyzer in identifying the morphology of blood cells in patients with hematological diseases and normal samples.MC-80全自动血细胞形态分析仪在识别血液系统疾病患者和正常样本血细胞形态中的应用评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43323. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043323.
3
Artificial intelligence-assisted early screening of acute promyelocytic leukaemia in blood smears: a prospective evaluation of MC-100i.
人工智能辅助血液涂片急性早幼粒细胞白血病的早期筛查:MC-100i的前瞻性评估
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 7;15:1572838. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1572838. eCollection 2025.
4
Real-World Application of Digital Morphology Analyzers: Practical Issues and Challenges in Clinical Laboratories.数字形态分析仪的实际应用:临床实验室中的实际问题与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 10;15(6):677. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060677.
5
Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?Sysmex DI-60的性能评估:数字形态分析仪对体液中白细胞分类是否可靠?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(6):592. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060592.