Suppr超能文献

2010-2020 年内科学系主任的性别和种族代表性趋势。

Gender and Racial Representation Trends Among Internal Medicine Department Chairs from 2010-2020.

机构信息

Center for Health Professions Education, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):898-904. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07783-z. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality medical education, reduction in health disparities, and healthcare research that includes all members of society are enhanced by diversity in departments of internal medicine (IM). Research on increasing diversity within the academic medicine student body or faculty notes the important role of leadership. Yet, there is a scarcity in research into diversity in leadership.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to go beyond aggregate numbers and answer the question: What is the level of parity representation, by gender and race, at department chair positions in academic IM departments?

DESIGN

A cross-sectional analysis of race/ethnicity and gender in IM medical school departments from 2010 to 2020 was conducted using data from the American Association of Medical College's (AAMC) Faculty Roster. The proportion of IM department chairs to IM faculty by race/ethnicity for each year (2010-2020) was used to calculate the Leadership Parity Index (LPI) in this study. LPI by gender and by gender and race/ethnicity were also calculated for each year.

RESULTS

In aggregate numbers, Black or African American and Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish Origin faculty remain under-represented in academic IM each making up, on average, approximately 4% of the total IM faculty. The LPI calculations revealed that faculty who identified as White were consistently over-represented as department chairs while Asian faculty were consistently under-represented in leadership and ranked lowest in leadership parity among the ethnic groups studied. The leadership parity index also showed that women faculty across all races were under-represented.

CONCLUSION

Women and Asian faculty encounter a ceiling effect that may be at play in IM departments. While significant progress still needs to be made in the representation of under-represented minorities, the findings of this study show that aggregate data does not provide a true picture of equity and parity in Internal Medicine faculties.

摘要

背景

内科部门的多样性可提高医学教育质量、减少健康差异以及开展涵盖社会各阶层的医疗保健研究。在学术医学学生群体或教师中增加多样性的研究指出了领导力的重要作用。然而,关于领导力多样性的研究仍然稀缺。

目的

本研究的目的是超越总体数量,回答以下问题:在学术内科部门的系主任职位中,按性别和种族划分,平等代表的比例是多少?

设计

使用美国医学院协会(AAMC)教师名册中的数据,对 2010 年至 2020 年内科医学系的种族/民族和性别进行了横断面分析。使用每年(2010-2020 年)内科系主任与内科教师的比例来计算本研究中的领导力均等指数(LPI)。还按性别和性别与种族/民族计算了每年的 LPI。

结果

从总体数量上看,黑人或非裔美国人和西班牙裔、拉丁裔或具有西班牙裔血统的教师在学术内科中仍然代表性不足,平均约占内科教师总数的 4%。LPI 的计算结果显示,自称为白人的教师在担任系主任时一直存在过度代表的情况,而亚洲教师在领导岗位上一直被低估,在研究的族裔群体中排名最低。领导力均等指数还表明,所有族裔的女性教师都代表性不足。

结论

女性和亚洲教师可能会遇到天花板效应,这种效应可能在内科部门中发挥作用。虽然在代表性不足的少数群体的代表性方面仍需要取得重大进展,但本研究的结果表明,总体数据并不能真实反映内科教师队伍中的公平和平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验