Suppr超能文献

使用等级公平指数来衡量急诊医学教师的职级晋升。

Using the Rank Equity Index to measure emergency medicine faculty rank progression.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Office of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;28(9):966-973. doi: 10.1111/acem.14268. Epub 2021 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faculty diversity is a high-priority goal for academic emergency medicine (EM). Most administrators currently monitor faculty diversity using aggregate data, which may obscure underrepresentation by rank. We apply the Rank Equity Index (REI) to EM faculty data to assess rank progression.

METHODS

We calculated the REI (% faculty cohort higher rank/% faculty cohort lower rank) for EM faculty. We performed REI analyses by faculty gender (women, men) and race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian). We compared professor/assistant professor, professor/associate professor, and associate professor/assistant professor to establish rank parity for gender and race/ethnicity. Parity is an REI of 1.0.

RESULTS

REI analysis by gender demonstrates that women faculty did not achieve parity at any rank comparison in any study year. REI analysis by race/ethnicity demonstrates that all faculty of color are below parity at the assistant to associate professor promotion. Latinx faculty are at parity for associate professor to professor, but Asian and Black faculty do not achieve parity in any comparison. Intersecting gender and race/ethnicity in the REI analysis demonstrates that Asian women have the lowest REIs among all faculty ranks and races/ethnicities. Men of all races/ethnicities achieved parity in two of three rank comparisons, except for Black men, who did not achieve parity in any comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

REI analysis demonstrates EM women faculty and faculty of color are not achieving rank parity and are disadvantaged at the first tier of promotion. A preliminary longitudinal trend analysis suggests little progress. Asian women and Black men experience the most rank inequity. REI analysis identifies a need for focused faculty development to enhance our most vulnerable faculty's rank progression, suggesting that targeted recruitment and retention efforts of women faculty of all races/ethnicities and faculty of color, in particular, will improve diversity at every tier of faculty rank.

摘要

背景

教师多样性是学术急诊医学(EM)的首要目标。大多数管理人员目前使用综合数据来监测教师多样性,而这些数据可能会掩盖职级代表性不足的问题。我们将等级公平指数(REI)应用于 EM 教师数据中,以评估职级晋升情况。

方法

我们计算了 EM 教师的 REI(高职级教师人数/低职级教师人数)。我们按教师性别(女性、男性)和种族/民族(白人、黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、亚裔)进行了 REI 分析。我们比较了教授/副教授、教授/助理教授和副教授/助理教授,以确定性别和种族/民族的职级平等。职级平等的 REI 值为 1.0。

结果

按性别进行的 REI 分析表明,在任何研究年度,女性教职员工在任何职级比较中都没有达到平等。按种族/民族进行的 REI 分析表明,所有少数族裔教职员工在从助理教授晋升为副教授时都处于劣势。拉丁裔教职员工在从副教授晋升为教授时处于平等地位,但亚裔和非裔教职员工在任何比较中都没有达到平等。在 REI 分析中交叉性别和种族/民族表明,在所有职级和种族/民族中,亚裔女性的 REI 最低。所有种族/民族的男性在三种职级比较中的两种中都达到了平等,除了非裔男性,他们在任何比较中都没有达到平等。

结论

REI 分析表明,EM 女性教职员工和少数族裔教职员工没有实现职级平等,在晋升的第一层级处于劣势。初步的纵向趋势分析表明进展甚微。亚裔女性和非裔男性经历了最严重的职级不公平。REI 分析表明,需要有针对性的教师发展来提高我们最弱势教师的职级晋升,这表明有针对性地招聘和留住所有种族/民族的女性教职员工和少数族裔教职员工,特别是将提高每个教职员工级别的多样性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验