• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部色素沉着特征评估:VISIA 与 CSKIN 的对比研究。

Assessment of features in facial hyperpigmentation: Comparison study between VISIA and CSKIN.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Cosmetic Safety and Efficacy Evaluation Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Skin Res Technol. 2022 Nov;28(6):846-850. doi: 10.1111/srt.13216. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/srt.13216
PMID:36308512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9907609/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hyperpigmentary disorder is one of the commonest skin concerns in dermatology clinics. The availability of noninvasive instruments provided a convenient, objective, and reproducible methodology for the evaluation of pigmentation and skin color. The aim of this study is to compare CSKIN and VISIA in measuring facial hyperpigmentation, as well as to assess the correlation between the instrumental analyzing and clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Eighty Chinese patients were enrolled. Images were taken and analyzed by VISIA from Canfield and CSKIN from Yanyun Technology, and the facial hyperpigmentation was graded by three dermatologists.

RESULTS

Feature counts within the facial pigmented areas analyzed by VISIA showed positive correlations with brown pixels (r = 0.331, p < 0.05) and brown percent (r = 0.395, p < 0.0001) measured by CSKIN. The parameters measured by CSKIN and VISIA were significantly correlated with visual scores graded by the dermatologists, with VISIA presenting a moderate correlation (r = 0.509, p < 0.001) and CSKIN a slightly stronger correlation with the visual scores (r = 0.653, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CSKIN could serve as an alternative in the assessment and follow-up of skin disease featuring with facial hyperpigmentation.

摘要

背景

色素沉着障碍是皮肤科最常见的皮肤问题之一。非侵入性仪器的出现为评估色素沉着和肤色提供了一种方便、客观和可重复的方法。本研究旨在比较 CSKIN 和 VISIA 在测量面部色素沉着方面的差异,并评估仪器分析与临床评估之间的相关性。

方法

共纳入 80 例中国患者。使用 Canfield 的 VISIA 和 Yanyun Technology 的 CSKIN 拍摄和分析图像,并由 3 名皮肤科医生对面部色素沉着进行分级。

结果

VISIA 分析的面部色素沉着区域的特征计数与 CSKIN 测量的棕色像素(r = 0.331,p < 0.05)和棕色百分比(r = 0.395,p < 0.0001)呈正相关。CSKIN 和 VISIA 测量的参数与皮肤科医生的视觉评分显著相关,VISIA 呈中度相关(r = 0.509,p < 0.001),CSKIN 与视觉评分的相关性略强(r = 0.653,p < 0.001)。

结论

CSKIN 可作为评估和随访面部色素沉着性皮肤病的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Assessment of features in facial hyperpigmentation: Comparison study between VISIA and CSKIN.面部色素沉着特征评估:VISIA 与 CSKIN 的对比研究。
Skin Res Technol. 2022 Nov;28(6):846-850. doi: 10.1111/srt.13216. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
Analysis of facial redness by comparing VISIA from Canfield and CSKIN from Yanyun Technology.通过比较 Canfield 的 VISIA 和 Yanyun Technology 的 CSKIN 分析面部红斑。
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Sep;26(5):696-701. doi: 10.1111/srt.12856. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Comparison of two kinds of skin imaging analysis software: VISIA from Canfield and IPP from Media Cybernetics.两种皮肤成像分析软件的比较:Canfield公司的VISIA软件和Media Cybernetics公司的IPP软件。
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Aug;24(3):379-385. doi: 10.1111/srt.12440. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
4
Comparison of two skin imaging analysis instruments: The VISIA from Canfield vs the ANTERA 3D CS from Miravex.两种皮肤成像分析仪器的比较:康菲尔德公司的VISIA与米瑞维克公司的ANTERA 3D CS。
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Feb;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12381. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Validation of the Visia Camera System for skin analysis through assessment of the correlations among the three offered measurements - the percentile, feature count and absolute score - as well as the three capture perspectives, from the left, front and right.通过评估所提供的三种测量值(百分位数、特征计数和绝对分数)之间以及从左、前、右三个拍摄角度之间的相关性,对用于皮肤分析的Visia摄像头系统进行验证。
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2022 May 31;11:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/iprs000165. eCollection 2022.
6
Helium plasma dermal resurfacing: VISIA CR assessment of facial spots, pores, and wrinkles-Preliminary findings.氦等离子体皮肤磨削术:利用VISIA CR对面部斑点、毛孔及皱纹进行评估——初步研究结果
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jun;20(6):1668-1678. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14106. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
A comparative study of an advanced skin imaging system in diagnosing facial pigmentary and inflammatory conditions.一种先进的皮肤成像系统对面部色素和炎症性病变的诊断比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 25;14(1):14673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63274-7.
8
Brightening and Improvement of Facial Skin Quality in Healthy Female Subjects With Moderate Hyperpigmentation or Dark Spots and Moderate Facial Aging.改善健康女性受试者中度色素沉着或黑斑以及中度面部衰老状况下的面部皮肤质量并提亮肤色
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Dec 1;17(12):1310-1315.
9
Analysis of facial redness by comparing VISIA and YLGTD.通过比较 VISIA 和 YLGTD 分析面部红斑
Skin Res Technol. 2023 Jul;29(7):e13356. doi: 10.1111/srt.13356.
10
Investigation of the precision of the Visia complexion analysis camera system in the assessment of skin surface features.Visia肤色分析摄像系统在评估皮肤表面特征方面的精度研究。
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2022 Nov 29;11:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/iprs000169. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Microplasma Radiofrequency in Treating Post-Traumatic Pigmentary Deposition: A VISIA Quantitative Analysis.微等离子体射频治疗创伤后色素沉着的临床疗效:VISIA定量分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 28;21:575-582. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S508522. eCollection 2025.
2
The mechanism and application of computer-assisted full facial skin imaging systems.计算机辅助全脸皮肤成像系统的机制与应用
Skin Health Dis. 2023 Dec 4;4(2):e320. doi: 10.1002/ski2.320. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Generation of skin tone and pigmented region-modified images using a pigment discrimination model trained with an optical approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability Assessment and Validation of the Skin Hyperpigmentation Index Compared to the Physician Global Assessment Score.皮肤色素沉着指数与医师整体评估评分的可靠性评估和验证。
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):688-691. doi: 10.1159/000520753. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Differential diagnosis and management of hyperpigmentation.色素沉着的鉴别诊断与处理。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Feb;47(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ced.14747. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Skin erythema and pigmentation: a review of optical assessment techniques.皮肤红斑与色素沉着:光学评估技术综述
利用基于光学方法训练的色素判别模型生成肤色和色素区域修改图像。
Skin Res Technol. 2023 Oct;29(10):e13486. doi: 10.1111/srt.13486.
4
Analysis of facial redness by comparing VISIA and YLGTD.通过比较 VISIA 和 YLGTD 分析面部红斑
Skin Res Technol. 2023 Jul;29(7):e13356. doi: 10.1111/srt.13356.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Mar;33:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102127. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Analysis of facial redness by comparing VISIA from Canfield and CSKIN from Yanyun Technology.通过比较 Canfield 的 VISIA 和 Yanyun Technology 的 CSKIN 分析面部红斑。
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Sep;26(5):696-701. doi: 10.1111/srt.12856. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Skin hyperpigmentation index: a new practical method for unbiased automated quantification of skin hyperpigmentation.皮肤色素沉着指数:一种用于无偏自动量化皮肤色素沉着的新实用方法。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jul;34(7):e334-e336. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16312. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Natural Eumelanin and Its Derivatives as Multifunctional Materials for Bioinspired Applications: A Review.天然真黑素及其衍生物作为仿生应用的多功能材料:综述。
Biomacromolecules. 2019 Dec 9;20(12):4312-4331. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01413. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Comparison of two kinds of skin imaging analysis software: VISIA from Canfield and IPP from Media Cybernetics.两种皮肤成像分析软件的比较:Canfield公司的VISIA软件和Media Cybernetics公司的IPP软件。
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Aug;24(3):379-385. doi: 10.1111/srt.12440. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
8
Facial Hyperpigmentation in Skin of Color: Special Considerations and Treatment.有色人种皮肤的面部色素沉着:特殊考量与治疗
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017 Apr;18(2):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0239-8.
9
The spectrum of skin diseases occurring in a multiethnic population in north-west London, U.K.: findings from a cross-sectional descriptive study.英国伦敦西北部多民族人群中出现的皮肤病谱:一项横断面描述性研究的结果
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):523-525. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14824. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
10
Melasma and assessment of the quality of life in Brazilian women.巴西女性的黄褐斑与生活质量评估。
An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;90(2):196-200. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20152771.