Hannover Medical School, Institute of Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Bioethics. 2023 Mar;37(3):285-291. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13099. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
The so-called "empirical turn" in bioethics gave rise to extensive theoretical and methodological debates and has significantly shaped the research landscape from two decades ago until the present day. Attentive observers of the evolution of the bioethical research field now notice a new trend towards the inclusion of data science methods for the treatment of ethical research questions. This new research domain of "digital bioethics" encompasses both studies replacing (or complementing) socio-empirical research on bioethical topics ("empirical digital bioethics") and argumentative approaches towards normative questions in the healthcare domain ("argumentative digital bioethics"). This article draws on insights taken from the debate on the "empirical turn" for sounding out perspectives for the newly developing field of "digital bioethics." We particularly discuss the disciplinary boundaries, chances and challenges, and potentially undesirable developments of the research field. The article closes with concrete suggestions on which debates need to be initiated and which measures need to be taken so that the path forward of "digital bioethics" will be a scientific success.
所谓的“经验转向”在生命伦理学中引发了广泛的理论和方法上的争论,并从二十年前至今显著塑造了该研究领域的面貌。现在,关注生命伦理学研究领域发展的人注意到了一种新的趋势,即将数据科学方法纳入到对伦理研究问题的处理中。这个新的研究领域“数字生命伦理学”既包括了替代(或补充)关于生命伦理主题的社会经验研究的研究(“经验数字生命伦理学”),也包括了针对医疗保健领域规范性问题的论证方法(“论证数字生命伦理学”)。本文借鉴了关于“经验转向”的辩论中的观点,为新兴的“数字生命伦理学”领域探索视角。我们特别讨论了该研究领域的学科界限、机遇和挑战,以及可能出现的不良发展。文章最后提出了具体的建议,即需要开展哪些辩论以及需要采取哪些措施,以使“数字生命伦理学”的前进道路成为科学上的成功。