School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China; Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China; Key Laboratory for Rule of Law Research, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116575. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116575. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
Environmental managers have been striving to optimize landscape structure to achieve a sustained supply of ecosystem services (ESs). However, we still lack a full understanding of the relationships between landscape structure and ESs due to the absence of thorough investigations on the variability of these relationships in space and time. To fill this critical gap, we assessed landscape structure alongside four important ESs (agricultural production (AP), carbon sequestration (CS), soil conservation (SC), and water retention (WR)) in the Wuhan metropolitan area (WMA), and then analyzed the spatiotemporal impacts of landscape structure on ESs from 2000 to 2020 using Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression. The results show only AP maintained a stable growth trend over the past two decades, while the other ESs fluctuated considerably with a noticeable decline in SC and WR. The importance of landscape structure in influencing ESs varies by time and place, depending on the local landscape composition and configuration. In general, landscape composition has a stronger and less temporally stable impact on ESs compared to configuration. Furthermore, increases in landscape diversity, as measured through Shannon's diversity index, and the percentage of woodlands were found to contribute to the simultaneous benefits of multiple ESs, but in most cases the effects of landscape structure on different ESs were different or even opposite, suggesting that trade-offs are critical in landscape management. The findings highlight the complex response of ESs to dramatically changing landscapes in the WMA and can guide decision-makers in precise spatial arrangement and temporal adjustments to improve current landscape management.
环境管理者一直在努力优化景观结构,以实现生态系统服务(ESs)的持续供应。然而,由于缺乏对这些关系在空间和时间上的可变性的彻底调查,我们仍然对景观结构与 ESs 之间的关系缺乏全面的了解。为了填补这一关键空白,我们评估了景观结构以及武汉市大都市区(WMA)的四个重要 ESs(农业生产(AP)、碳固存(CS)、土壤保持(SC)和水保持(WR)),然后使用地理和时间加权回归分析了 2000 年至 2020 年期间景观结构对 ESs 的时空影响。结果表明,只有 AP 在过去二十年保持稳定增长趋势,而其他 ESs 波动较大,SC 和 WR 明显下降。景观结构对 ESs 的影响在时间和地点上的重要性因当地景观组成和配置而异。总体而言,与配置相比,景观组成对 ESs 的影响更强且时间更稳定。此外,景观多样性的增加(通过香农多样性指数衡量)和林地的比例被发现有助于同时提高多个 ESs 的效益,但在大多数情况下,景观结构对不同 ESs 的影响是不同的,甚至是相反的,这表明权衡在景观管理中至关重要。这些发现强调了 ESs 对 WMA 中急剧变化的景观的复杂反应,并可以为决策者提供指导,以进行精确的空间布置和时间调整,从而改善当前的景观管理。