Liu Xiaoyang, Wang Hongwei, Li Songhong, Wang Liyang
College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830017, China.
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830017, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74618-8.
Exploring the relationship between land use cover/change (LUCC) and ecosystem service value (ESV) under different future scenarios can provide guidance for selecting future development patterns and for the scientific utilization of land resources in the region. In this study, LUCC under different scenarios in the North Slope of Tianshan Mountain (NSTM) was simulated using the PLUS model. The ESV coefficients were adjusted for regional differences and social development factors to better reflect the actual situation in the study area. The interactions between LUCC, landscape pattern (LSP), and ESV were systematically analyzed, while at the same time, ESV and the level of economic development were fitted to the Ecological Kuznets Curve, which was then used to determine its trend and inflection point. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) Cropland and unused land are the main types of land use change in the NSTM, both historically and in the future. Cropland shows an increase in the natural development scenario and a decrease in the ecological protection scenario. Unused land shows an increase in the different development scenarios, indicating that unused land has higher development potential in the NSTM. NSTM shows a continuous decrease in ESV in the natural development scenario and a continuous increase in ESV in the ecological protection scenario. (2) LSP in both historical and future NSTM have evolved to show fragmentation, heterogeneity, and complexity in patch forms. However, this trend is slower in the ecological protection scenario than in the natural development scenario. LUCC, LSP, and ESV form an integrated framework of interactions, where LUCC influences ESV through LSP, and changes in ESV feedback to LUCC through LSP, which acts as a bridging mediator. (3) The Ecological Kuznets Curve of NSTM exhibits an N-shape, showing a clear overall rightward trend across different development scenarios at the annual level. At the interannual level, the curves for the natural development scenario are situated in the middle of the declining phase of the N-shape, with no ecological inflection point occurring during the study period. In contrast, the curves for the ecological protection scenario display a declining-ascending trend, with the ecological inflection point occurring when per capita GDP reaches 2.5 × 10^6 CNY.
探索不同未来情景下土地利用覆盖/变化(LUCC)与生态系统服务价值(ESV)之间的关系,可为区域未来发展模式的选择和土地资源的科学利用提供指导。本研究利用PLUS模型模拟了天山北坡(NSTM)不同情景下的LUCC。针对区域差异和社会发展因素对ESV系数进行了调整,以更好地反映研究区域的实际情况。系统分析了LUCC、景观格局(LSP)和ESV之间的相互作用,同时将ESV与经济发展水平拟合到生态库兹涅茨曲线,进而确定其趋势和拐点。得出以下结论:(1)农田和未利用地是NSTM历史时期和未来土地利用变化的主要类型。在自然发展情景下农田面积增加,在生态保护情景下农田面积减少。未利用地在不同发展情景下均呈现增加趋势,表明NSTM的未利用地具有较高的开发潜力。在自然发展情景下NSTM的ESV持续下降,在生态保护情景下ESV持续增加。(2)NSTM历史时期和未来的LSP均呈现出斑块形态破碎化、异质性和复杂性的演变趋势。然而,生态保护情景下这种趋势比自然发展情景下更为缓慢。LUCC、LSP和ESV形成了一个相互作用的综合框架,其中LUCC通过LSP影响ESV,ESV的变化通过LSP反馈给LUCC,LSP起到了桥梁中介的作用。(3)NSTM的生态库兹涅茨曲线呈N形,在年度层面不同发展情景下整体呈现明显的右移趋势。在年际层面,自然发展情景下的曲线位于N形下降阶段的中部,研究期间未出现生态拐点。相比之下,生态保护情景下的曲线呈现下降-上升趋势,当人均GDP达到2.5×10^6元时出现生态拐点。