• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国长江经济带景观结构对生态系统服务功能之间权衡与协同作用的时空效应

Spatiotemporal effects of landscape structure on the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem service functions in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.

作者信息

Yao Yao, Yang Yuanyuan

机构信息

School of Public Management, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, 500025, China.

School of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, 550014, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99295-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-99295-z
PMID:40328950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12056077/
Abstract

Effective landscape management is vital for maximizing the availability of ecosystem service functions (ESF). However, how landscape pattern simultaneously affects multiple ESF across time and space, specifically regarding changes in their relationships, has not been comprehensively evaluated. Accordingly, the current study examines the dynamic impact of landscape pattern on the interactions among ES trade-offs in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) from 1990 to 2020. Five key ESF are evaluated: carbon sequestration (CS), food supply (FS), habitat quality (HQ), water retention (WR), and soil conservation (SC). The geographical and temporal weighted regression model is adopted to analyze how these relationships are influenced by changes in the landscape pattern over 30 years. Over the past three decades, the overall amounts of FS, WR, and SC have increased, with only WR exhibiting a sustained increasing trend, while CS and HQ have significantly decreased. The trade-off coordination effects among the ESF generally transitioned from trade-offs to synergies, with the CS-FS change more pronounced, shifting from weak trade-offs (- 0.29) to synergies (0.20). Significant spatial variations were also observed. Most landscape pattern significantly impact the relationships among ESF. Specifically, landscape composition has a stronger influence on ecosystems than configuration; however, these effects are diverse and often inconsistent, requiring decision-makers to continuously balance landscape management. The impacts of landscape pattern on the relationships between SC and other ESF (CS-SC, HQ-SC, HQ-SC, and WR-SC) were consistent, with the most prominent impact on CS-SC. This suggests that landscape pattern exerts a comparatively steady impact on CS, benefiting from the contributions of decision-makers to soil conservation in regional land parcels. These results underscore the intricate responses of inter-ecosystem relationships to landscape pattern and the need for dynamic trade-offs in landscape management. Cumulatively, this study provides crucial guidance for policymakers in designing effective landscape management policies to mitigate ecological degradation.

摘要

有效的景观管理对于最大限度地发挥生态系统服务功能(ESF)至关重要。然而,景观格局如何在时空上同时影响多种生态系统服务功能,特别是它们之间关系的变化,尚未得到全面评估。因此,本研究考察了1990年至2020年中国长江经济带(YREB)景观格局对生态系统服务权衡关系的动态影响。评估了五项关键的生态系统服务功能:碳固存(CS)、食物供应(FS)、栖息地质量(HQ)、水分保持(WR)和土壤保持(SC)。采用地理和时间加权回归模型来分析这些关系如何受到30年来景观格局变化的影响。在过去三十年中,食物供应、水分保持和土壤保持的总量有所增加,只有水分保持呈现持续增加的趋势,而碳固存和栖息地质量则显著下降。生态系统服务功能之间的权衡协调效应总体上从权衡转向协同,碳固存 - 食物供应的变化更为明显,从弱权衡(-0.29)转变为协同(0.20)。还观察到显著的空间差异。大多数景观格局对生态系统服务功能之间的关系有显著影响。具体而言,景观组成对生态系统的影响比格局更强;然而,这些影响是多样的,且往往不一致,这要求决策者不断平衡景观管理。景观格局对土壤保持与其他生态系统服务功能(碳固存 - 土壤保持、栖息地质量 - 土壤保持、栖息地质量 - 土壤保持和水分保持 - 土壤保持)之间关系的影响是一致的,对碳固存 - 土壤保持的影响最为突出。这表明景观格局对碳固存产生了相对稳定的影响,这得益于决策者对区域地块土壤保持的贡献。这些结果强调了生态系统间关系对景观格局的复杂响应以及景观管理中动态权衡的必要性。总体而言,本研究为政策制定者设计有效的景观管理政策以减轻生态退化提供了关键指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/07796a7843f7/41598_2025_99295_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/41ee4e132213/41598_2025_99295_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/586b93f5111b/41598_2025_99295_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/8ddbd1c552f2/41598_2025_99295_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/d4cbe7d33315/41598_2025_99295_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/d663b0dc8e62/41598_2025_99295_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/e18bc826c2fa/41598_2025_99295_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/06976cda1803/41598_2025_99295_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/eea44567718a/41598_2025_99295_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/eea44567718a/41598_2025_99295_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/c2f51aceaa90/41598_2025_99295_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/66b4bbde1a6d/41598_2025_99295_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/63756b8c87ce/41598_2025_99295_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/a77d1412739e/41598_2025_99295_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/f091e0bdb7fa/41598_2025_99295_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/07796a7843f7/41598_2025_99295_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/41ee4e132213/41598_2025_99295_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/586b93f5111b/41598_2025_99295_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/8ddbd1c552f2/41598_2025_99295_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/d4cbe7d33315/41598_2025_99295_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/d663b0dc8e62/41598_2025_99295_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/e18bc826c2fa/41598_2025_99295_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/06976cda1803/41598_2025_99295_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/eea44567718a/41598_2025_99295_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/eea44567718a/41598_2025_99295_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/c2f51aceaa90/41598_2025_99295_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/66b4bbde1a6d/41598_2025_99295_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/63756b8c87ce/41598_2025_99295_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/a77d1412739e/41598_2025_99295_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/f091e0bdb7fa/41598_2025_99295_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/673e/12056077/07796a7843f7/41598_2025_99295_Fig15_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatiotemporal effects of landscape structure on the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem service functions in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.中国长江经济带景观结构对生态系统服务功能之间权衡与协同作用的时空效应
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99295-z.
2
Spatial-temporal heterogeneity in the influence of landscape patterns on trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services: a case study of the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi.景观格局对生态系统服务权衡/协同作用影响的时空异质性:以陕北黄土高原为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6144-6159. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31521-5. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015.2000-2015 年中国长江经济带生态系统服务权衡与决定因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:1601-1614. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.046. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze river economic Belt, China.探究中国长江经济带典型生态系统服务之间的相互关系和驱动因素。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119794. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119794. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
5
Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services at Watershed and Landscape Scales: A Case Analysis of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section).流域和景观尺度上生态系统服务权衡与协同的时空特征:以黄河流域(河南段)为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315772.
6
Multiscale ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in the Han River Basin, China: implications for watershed management.中国汉江流域多尺度生态系统服务协同/权衡及其驱动机制:对流域管理的启示
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43440-43454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25248-6. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Scale dependency of trade-offs/synergies analysis of ecosystem services based on Bayesian Belief Networks: A case of the Yellow River Basin.基于贝叶斯信念网络的生态系统服务权衡/协同分析的尺度依赖性:以黄河流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Feb;375:124410. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124410. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
8
Spatial Responses of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies to Impact Factors in Liaoning Province.辽宁省生态系统服务权衡与协同对影响因素的空间响应
Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;75(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01919-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
9
Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table.识别生态系统服务包以及高地下水位采煤区权衡和协同作用的时空特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151036. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151036. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
10
Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.中国长江经济带生态系统服务的约束关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):12484-12505. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13845-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatio-temporal dynamics and drivers of cropland ecosystem services value during the past two decades in Yangtze river economic belt, China.中国长江经济带过去二十年耕地生态系统服务价值的时空动态及其驱动因素
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 27;13:1622093. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622093. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Study on trade-offs and synergies of rural ecosystem services in the Tacheng-Emin Basin, Xinjiang, China: Implications for zoning management of rural ecological functions.中国新疆塔城额敏河流域农村生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究:对农村生态功能分区管理的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;363:121411. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121411. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Remote sensing estimation of regional PM based on GTWR model -A case study of southwest China.基于 GTWR 模型的区域 PM 遥感估算——以中国西南地区为例。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Jun 15;351:124057. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124057. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
3
Fostering inclusive green growth in China: Identifying the impact of the regional integration strategy of Yangtze River Economic Belt.
促进中国包容性绿色增长:识别长江经济带区域一体化战略的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;358:120952. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120952. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Research Progress of Grassland Ecosystem Structure and Stability and Inspiration for Improving Its Service Capacity in the Karst Desertification Control.喀斯特石漠化治理中草地生态系统结构与稳定性研究进展及其提升服务功能的启示
Plants (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;12(4):770. doi: 10.3390/plants12040770.
5
Assessment of Carbon Storage under Different SSP-RCP Scenarios in Terrestrial Ecosystems of Jilin Province, China.评估中国吉林省陆地生态系统在不同 SSP-RCP 情景下的碳储存。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043691.
6
Study on the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Tourism Eco-Security in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域旅游生态安全时空格局及驱动机制研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043562.
7
Progress toward Sustainable Development Goals and interlinkages between them in Arctic countries.北极国家在可持续发展目标方面的进展及其相互关联。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 31;9(2):e13306. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13306. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
The dynamic relationships between landscape structure and ecosystem services: An empirical analysis from the Wuhan metropolitan area, China.景观结构与生态系统服务之间的动态关系:来自中国武汉大都市区的实证分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116575. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116575. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
9
Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and the Key Influencing Factors of PM and PM in Heilongjiang, China from 2014 to 2018.2014 年至 2018 年中国黑龙江省 PM 和 PM 的时空异质性及其关键影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18):11627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811627.
10
Spatial Differences of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Poyang Lake Area at the Local Level.鄱阳湖地区地方层面生态福祉绩效的空间差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 11;19(18):11439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811439.