• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产后估计胎儿巨大的试产:一项回顾性队列研究。

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Dec;51(10):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102494. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102494
PMID:36309341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight ≥90th percentile is not associated with a greater risk for uterine rupture, trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) is considered relatively contraindicated for macrosomic fetuses. Hence, when an estimated fetal weight of 4000 g is detected, TOLAC is usually avoided.Our aim was to evaluate the obstetrical outcome and safety of TOLAC in women with estimated large for gestational age fetuses (eLGA) (≥90th percentile).

STUDY DESIGN

Our retrospective cohort study encompassed all pregnant women with an estimated fetal weight ≥90th percentile for gestational age, admitted to a single tertiary care center between January 2012-July 2017 for TOLAC.

RESULTS

1949 women met the inclusion criteria; 78 (4%) eLGA and 1871 (96%) controls. Fifty-five (70.5%) women in the study group had experienced a successful vaginal delivery compared to 1506 (80.5%) of the controls (p = 0.03). The rate of obstetrical complications, including scar dehiscence, uterine rupture, a 3rd/4th degree perineal tear or shoulder dystocia were comparable. The rate of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) increased in the study group compared to the controls (7.7 % vs.1.7%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TOLAC for eLGA fetuses can be considered safe, however, lower successful rates of vaginal births after a cesarean delivery and an increased PPH rate, may be expected.

摘要

目的

尽管超声估计胎儿体重≥第 90 百分位与子宫破裂风险增加无关,但对于巨大胎儿,剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)被认为相对禁忌。因此,当检测到估计胎儿体重为 4000 克时,通常避免 TOLAC。我们的目的是评估估计胎儿体重过大(eLGA)(≥第 90 百分位)孕妇 TOLAC 的产科结局和安全性。

研究设计

我们的回顾性队列研究包括 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间在一家三级保健中心因 TOLAC 入院的所有估计胎儿体重≥胎龄第 90 百分位的孕妇。

结果

1949 名符合纳入标准的妇女中,78 名(4%)为 eLGA,1871 名(96%)为对照组。研究组中有 55 名(70.5%)女性成功阴道分娩,而对照组中有 1506 名(80.5%)(p=0.03)。包括瘢痕破裂、子宫破裂、三度/四度会阴撕裂或肩难产在内的产科并发症发生率相似。与对照组相比,研究组产后出血(PPH)的发生率增加(7.7% vs. 1.7%;p=0.001)。

结论

对于 eLGA 胎儿,TOLAC 可被认为是安全的,然而,剖宫产术后阴道分娩的成功率较低和 PPH 发生率增加可能是预料之中的。

相似文献

1
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study.剖宫产后估计胎儿巨大的试产:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Dec;51(10):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102494. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Trial of labour versus elective caesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age foetuses after prior caesarean delivery: a multicenter retrospective study.试产与选择性剖宫产用于既往剖宫产估计胎儿巨大儿的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 26;23(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05688-1.
3
A Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section with a Macrosomic Neonate. Is It Safe?剖宫产后巨大儿阴道试产:安全吗?
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e400-e405. doi: 10.1055/a-1884-1221. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean.复杂的初次剖宫产会增加再次剖宫产试产时子宫破裂的风险。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):273-277. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4801-x. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.与再次剖宫产相比,对于没有其他风险因素的产妇,行试产。这些产妇的唯一风险因素是曾行剖宫产。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12240.
7
[Establish and application of scoring scale for trial of labor after cesarean section].剖宫产术后试产评分量表的建立与应用
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;57(5):339-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220321-00180.
8
The Feasibility of a Trial of Labor after Two Cesarean Deliveries: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Success.两次剖宫产术后试产的可行性:成功的结局和预测因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2636-e2644. doi: 10.1055/a-2135-6962. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
9
Trial of Labor After Cesarean in Adolescents - A Multicenter Study.青少年剖宫产术后试产——一项多中心研究
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.剖宫产术后有既往阴道手术分娩失败史的妇女试产结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):49.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Trial of labour versus elective caesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age foetuses after prior caesarean delivery: a multicenter retrospective study.试产与选择性剖宫产用于既往剖宫产估计胎儿巨大儿的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 26;23(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05688-1.