• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

试产与选择性剖宫产用于既往剖宫产估计胎儿巨大儿的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Trial of labour versus elective caesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age foetuses after prior caesarean delivery: a multicenter retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foch Hospital, 92150, Suresnes, France.

Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Foch Hospital, 92150, Suresnes, France.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 26;23(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05688-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05688-1
PMID:37237350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10214606/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower rates of successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in association with fetal macrosomia were previously reported. This study aimed to compare TOLAC to elective caesarean delivery (CD) in women with estimated fetal weight large for gestational age (eLGA) and a prior CD. Primary outcome was to analyse the mode of delivery in case of TOLAC. Secondary outcome was to compare maternal and foetal morbidity.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, multicentric, cohort study in five maternity units between January and December 2020. Inclusion criteria were: women with a single prior CD and eLGA or neonatal weight > 90th percentile with singleton pregnancy and gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

rate of vaginal delivery, maternal and fetal morbidity including: shoulder dystocia, neonatal hospitalization, fetal trauma, neonatal acidosis, uterine rupture, 3 and 4 perineal tears, post-partum hemorrhage, and a need for blood transfusion.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty women met inclusion criteria, including 235 (53.4%) eLGA. 170 (72.3%) had a TOLAC (study group) and 65 (27.7%) an elective CD (control). 117 (68.82%) TOLAC had a vaginal delivery. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the rates of: postpartum haemorrhage, transfusion, Apgar score, neonatal hospitalization, and foetal trauma. Cord lactate was higher in the case of TOLAC (3.2 vs 2.2, p < 0.001). Median fetal weight was 3815 g (3597-4085) vs. 3865 g (3659-4168): p = 0.068 in the study vs. controls group respectively.

CONCLUSION

TOLAC for eLGA fetuses is legitimate because there is no difference in maternal-fetal morbidity, and the CD rate is acceptable.

摘要

背景

先前有报道称,胎儿巨大儿与剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)成功率降低有关。本研究旨在比较估计胎儿体重过大(eLGA)且既往有剖宫产史的妇女行 TOLAC 与选择性剖宫产(CD)的效果。主要结局为分析 TOLAC 的分娩方式。次要结局为比较母婴发病率。

方法

我们在 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间在五家产科单位进行了一项回顾性、描述性、多中心队列研究。纳入标准为:单胎既往有剖宫产史且 eLGA 或新生儿体重>第 90 百分位数,单胎妊娠且孕龄≥37 周。

主要观察指标

阴道分娩率、母婴发病率,包括肩难产、新生儿住院、胎儿创伤、胎儿酸中毒、子宫破裂、3 度和 4 度会阴裂伤、产后出血和需要输血。

结果

440 名符合纳入标准的妇女,包括 235 名(53.4%)eLGA。170 名(72.3%)行 TOLAC(研究组),65 名(27.7%)行择期 CD(对照组)。117 名(68.82%)TOLAC 行阴道分娩。两组间产后出血、输血、Apgar 评分、新生儿住院和胎儿创伤发生率无显著差异。TOLAC 组脐带血乳酸水平较高(3.2 vs 2.2,p<0.001)。胎儿体重中位数分别为 3815g(3597-4085)和 3865g(3659-4168):研究组与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(p=0.068)。

结论

对于 eLGA 胎儿,TOLAC 是合理的,因为母婴发病率无差异,且 CD 率可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2823/10214606/8255c08b8647/12884_2023_5688_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2823/10214606/ce0f4003f799/12884_2023_5688_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2823/10214606/8255c08b8647/12884_2023_5688_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2823/10214606/ce0f4003f799/12884_2023_5688_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2823/10214606/8255c08b8647/12884_2023_5688_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trial of labour versus elective caesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age foetuses after prior caesarean delivery: a multicenter retrospective study.试产与选择性剖宫产用于既往剖宫产估计胎儿巨大儿的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 26;23(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05688-1.
2
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study.剖宫产后估计胎儿巨大的试产:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Dec;51(10):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102494. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
A Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section with a Macrosomic Neonate. Is It Safe?剖宫产后巨大儿阴道试产:安全吗?
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e400-e405. doi: 10.1055/a-1884-1221. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.与剖宫产后再次经阴道分娩结局相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):430-436. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1916451. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
5
[Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].剖宫产术后阴道分娩的临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 25;51(8):586-91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.08.007.
6
Outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in women with one versus two prior cesarean deliveries after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital.在学术医院临床实践指南改变后,对于一次或两次剖宫产史的妇女再次尝试剖宫产的结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(9):1499-1504. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1520831. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
[Outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean section in women with advanced maternal age].高龄产妇剖宫产术后经阴道分娩的结局
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;52(8):521-525. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.08.004.
8
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
[Establish and application of scoring scale for trial of labor after cesarean section].剖宫产术后试产评分量表的建立与应用
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;57(5):339-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220321-00180.
10
Trial of Labor After Cesarean in Adolescents - A Multicenter Study.青少年剖宫产术后试产——一项多中心研究
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The rates of vaginal births after cesarean section have increased during the last decades: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Finland.过去几十年来,剖宫产术后阴道分娩的比例有所增加:芬兰一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;308(1):157-162. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07010-y. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for estimated large for gestational age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study.剖宫产后估计胎儿巨大的试产:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Dec;51(10):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102494. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Strategies to increase the rate of vaginal deliveries after cesarean without negative impact on outcomes.
提高剖宫产术后阴道分娩率而不影响母婴结局的策略。
Midwifery. 2022 Mar;106:103247. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103247. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Neonatal outcomes in trial of vaginal birth versus repeat caesarean delivery in preterm pregnancies: A prospective cohort study.足月前胎膜早破孕妇行阴道分娩与再次剖宫产分娩的新生儿结局比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2022 Jul;129(8):1319-1324. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17056. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity.预测足月妊娠经剖宫产分娩后阴道分娩的可能性:一个不考虑种族和民族的计算器。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;225(6):664.e1-664.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Large-for-gestational-age or macrosomia as a classifier for risk of adverse perinatal outcome: a retrospective cross-sectional study.巨大儿或胎儿过大作为不良围产结局风险的分类器:一项回顾性横断面研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5564-5571. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1887127. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications.日本剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC):比例和并发症。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;301(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05492-8. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
Trial of Labor After Cesarean in Adolescents - A Multicenter Study.青少年剖宫产术后试产——一项多中心研究
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216.巨大儿:ACOG 实践通报,第 216 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):e18-e35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003606.
10
Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y.