• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症的短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗:全国队列研究的事后分析

Short- versus long-course antibiotic therapy for sepsis: a post hoc analysis of the nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Takahashi Nozomi, Imaeda Taro, Nakada Taka-Aki, Oami Takehiko, Abe Toshikazu, Yamao Yasuo, Nakagawa Satoshi, Ogura Hiroshi, Shime Nobuaki, Matsushima Asako, Fushimi Kiyohide

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.

Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2022 Oct 29;10(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00642-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40560-022-00642-3
PMID:36309710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9617305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The appropriate duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacterial sepsis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of a shorter course of antibiotics on 28-day mortality in comparison with a longer course using a national database in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis from the retrospective observational study of patients with sepsis using a Japanese claims database from 2010 to 2017. The patient dataset was divided into short-course (≤ 7 days) and long-course (≥ 8 days) groups according to the duration of initial antibiotic administration. Subsequently, propensity score matching was performed to adjust the baseline imbalance between the two groups. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were re-initiated antibiotics at 3 and 7 days, during hospitalization, administration period, antibiotic-free days, and medical cost.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 448,146 pairs were analyzed. The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the short-course group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95; P < 0.001), while the occurrence of re-initiated antibiotics at 3 and 7 days and during hospitalization were significantly higher in the short-course group (P < 0.001). Antibiotic-free days (median [IQR]) were significantly shorter in the long-course group (21 days [17 days, 23 days] vs. 17 days [14 days, 19 days], P < 0.001), and short-course administration contributed to a decrease in medical costs (coefficient $-212, 95% CI; - 223 to - 201, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed a significant decrease in the 28-day mortality of the patients in the short-course group in patients of male sex (hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% CI; 0.89-0.93), community-onset sepsis (hazard ratio; 0.95, 95% CI; 0.93-0.98), abdominal infection (hazard ratio; 0.92, 95% CI; 0.88-0.97) and heart infection (hazard ratio; 0.74, 95% CI; 0.61-0.90), while a significant increase was observed in patients with non-community-onset sepsis (hazard ratio; 1.09, 95% CI; 1.06-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the short-course group, even though there was a higher rate of re-initiated antibiotics in the short course.

摘要

背景

细菌性脓毒症患者抗生素治疗的适宜疗程仍不明确。本研究旨在利用日本的全国数据库,评估较短疗程抗生素与较长疗程抗生素相比,对28天死亡率的影响。

方法

我们对2010年至2017年使用日本索赔数据库的脓毒症患者回顾性观察研究进行了事后分析。根据初始抗生素给药疗程,将患者数据集分为短疗程(≤7天)和长疗程(≥8天)组。随后,进行倾向评分匹配以调整两组之间的基线不平衡。主要结局是28天死亡率。次要结局包括在第3天和第7天、住院期间重新开始使用抗生素、给药期、无抗生素天数和医疗费用。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,分析了448,146对数据。短疗程组的28天死亡率显著较低(风险比,0.94;95%CI,0.92 - 0.95;P < 0.001),而短疗程组在第3天和第7天以及住院期间重新开始使用抗生素的发生率显著更高(P < 0.001)。长疗程组的无抗生素天数(中位数[四分位间距])显著更短(21天[17天,23天]对17天[14天,19天],P < 0.001),短疗程给药导致医疗费用降低(系数 - 212,95%CI; - 223至 - 201,P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,短疗程组男性患者(风险比:0.91,95%CI;0.89 - 0.93)、社区获得性脓毒症患者(风险比;0.95,95%CI;0.93 - 0.98)、腹部感染患者(风险比;0.92,95%CI;0.88 - 0.97)和心脏感染患者(风险比;0.74,95%CI;0.61 - 0.90)的28天死亡率显著降低,而非社区获得性脓毒症患者(风险比;1.09,95%CI;1.06 - 1.12)的死亡率显著升高。

结论

短疗程组的28天死亡率显著较低,尽管短疗程中重新开始使用抗生素的比例较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/c684bbfa193c/40560_2022_642_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/c58cc4606eee/40560_2022_642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/9a13ab06aa62/40560_2022_642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/c684bbfa193c/40560_2022_642_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/c58cc4606eee/40560_2022_642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/9a13ab06aa62/40560_2022_642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c1/9617305/c684bbfa193c/40560_2022_642_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short- versus long-course antibiotic therapy for sepsis: a post hoc analysis of the nationwide cohort study.脓毒症的短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗:全国队列研究的事后分析
J Intensive Care. 2022 Oct 29;10(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00642-3.
2
Short versus long duration antimicrobial treatment for community-onset bacteraemia: A propensity score matching study.短程与长程抗菌治疗社区获得性菌血症:倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Aug;54(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection Presenting with Sepsis Do Not Require Longer Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy.患有复杂性腹腔内感染并伴有脓毒症的患者无需延长抗菌治疗时间。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Apr;222(4):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.050. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Association of Antibiotic Treatment With Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for an Asthma Exacerbation Treated With Systemic Corticosteroids.抗生素治疗与全身用皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘加重住院患者结局的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):333-339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5394.
5
Comparison of Duration and Empiric Antibiotic Choice of Post-Operative Treatment in Abdominal Sepsis.腹部脓毒症术后治疗持续时间和经验性抗生素选择的比较。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;23(5):444-450. doi: 10.1089/sur.2021.344. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Antibiotic treatment duration for culture-negative sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中培养阴性脓毒症的抗生素治疗持续时间。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 22;3(1):e249. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.502. eCollection 2023.
7
The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.DISPARITY-II研究:重症脓毒症或脓毒性休克女性患者抗生素给药延迟情况
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1499-502. doi: 10.1111/acem.12546. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Antibiotic Treatment Duration in Children With Pyelonephritis.肾盂肾炎患儿抗生素治疗持续时间的比较效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e203951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3951.
9
Short versus prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy for children with uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia.单纯性革兰氏阴性菌血症儿童使用抗生素治疗的短疗程与长疗程对比
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):779-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt424. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD006576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006576.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and outcomes of septic shock in Japan: a nationwide retrospective cohort study from a medical claims database by the Japan Sepsis Alliance (JaSA) study group.日本感染性休克的流行病学与转归:日本脓毒症联盟(JaSA)研究组基于医疗理赔数据库的全国性回顾性队列研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 16;29(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05556-8.
2
Challenging management dogma where evidence is non-existent, weak, or outdated: part II.挑战无证据、证据薄弱或证据过时的管理教条:第二部分。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1804-1813. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07634-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Association of Intensive Care Unit Case Volume With Mortality and Cost in Sepsis Based on a Japanese Nationwide Medical Claims Database Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Short- versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy for sepsis or infectious diseases in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症成年患者脓毒症或感染性疾病的短期与长期抗生素治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2022 Mar;54(3):213-223. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.2001046. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
Trends in the incidence and outcome of sepsis using data from a Japanese nationwide medical claims database-the Japan Sepsis Alliance (JaSA) study group.
基于日本全国医疗索赔数据库研究的重症监护病房病例量与脓毒症死亡率及成本的关联
Cureus. 2024 Jul 29;16(7):e65697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65697. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Impact of Appropriate Empirical Antibiotic Treatment on the Clinical Response of Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Observational Study.适当的经验性抗生素治疗对重症监护病房脓毒症患者临床反应的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;13(6):569. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060569.
5
Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Cholangitis With Positive Blood Cultures: A Retrospective Study.血培养阳性的急性胆管炎短程抗生素治疗的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Apr 24;16(4):e58883. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58883. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Epidemiology of sepsis in a Japanese administrative database.日本行政数据库中脓毒症的流行病学
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Oct 12;10(1):e890. doi: 10.1002/ams2.890. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Short Course of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for -KPC Bloodstream Infections in Italy.意大利短疗程头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗产KPC血流感染的成本效益分析
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 23;11(5):1102. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051102.
8
Mortality analysis among sepsis patients in and out of intensive care units using the Japanese nationwide medical claims database: a study by the Japan Sepsis Alliance study group.利用日本全国医疗索赔数据库对重症监护病房内外脓毒症患者进行的死亡率分析:日本脓毒症联盟研究小组的一项研究
J Intensive Care. 2023 Jan 7;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00650-x.
使用日本全国医疗索赔数据库(日本败血症联盟(JaSA)研究组)的数据探讨败血症发病率和结局的变化趋势。
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 16;25(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03762-8.
4
Association between ambulance use and hospitalization costs among heart failure patients.救护车使用与心力衰竭患者住院费用的关系。
Heart Vessels. 2021 May;36(5):654-658. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01732-8. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
History and Profile of Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC): Development of a Real Data Collection System for Acute Inpatient Care in Japan.诊断程序组合(DPC)的历史和概况:日本急性住院护理真实数据采集系统的开发。
J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 5;31(1):1-11. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200288. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Association Between IV Thiamine and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock: A Nationwide Observational Study.静脉注射硫胺素与脓毒性休克患者死亡率的关联:一项全国性观察研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1135-1139. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004394.
7
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的败血症:1. 2012-2018 年败血症负担。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):276-288. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224.
8
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bacteremia Due to .血培养阳性. 所致菌血症的抗生素治疗疗程的系统评价和荟萃分析
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02495-18. Print 2019 May.
9
Sepsis Surveillance Using Adult Sepsis Events Simplified eSOFA Criteria Versus Sepsis-3 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria.使用成人脓毒症事件简化 eSOFA 标准与脓毒症 3 序贯器官衰竭评估标准进行脓毒症监测。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):307-314. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003521.
10
Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States-An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level.美国脓毒症的流行病学和成本:基于诊断时间和严重程度级别的分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1889-1897. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003342.