Laura Ward McKernan, Cooper Sally-Ann, Henderson Angela, Stanley Bethany, Greenlaw Nicola, Pacitti Christine, Cairns Deborah
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 0XH, Scotland.
Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QW, Scotland.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 29;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x.
People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine the source of anticholinergic burden from prescribed medication.
Retrospective matched observational study using record linkage. Adults with (n = 4,305), and without (n = 12,915), intellectual disabilities matched by age-, sex- and neighbourhood deprivation. The main outcome measure was the prescription of long-term (approximately 12 months use) anticholinergic medications overall (classified according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS]), by drug class, individual drugs, and polypharmacy.
Adults with n = 1,654 (38.4%), and without n = 3,047 (23.6%), intellectual disabilities were prescribed medications long-term with anticholinergic effects. Of those on such drugs, adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely to be on central nervous system (62.6%), gastrointestinal (46.7%), and cardiovascular (28.4%) medications. They were prescribed more central nervous system, gynaecological/urinary tract, musculoskeletal, and respiratory medications, and less cardiovascular, infection, and endocrine medications than their matched comparators. Regardless of age, sex, or neighbourhood deprivation, adults with intellectual disabilities had greater odds of being prescribed antipsychotics (OR = 5.37 [4.40-6.57], p < 0.001), antiepileptics (OR = 2.57 [2.22-2.99], p < 0.001), and anxiolytics/hypnotics (OR = 1.28 [1.06-1.56], p = 0.012). Compared to the general population, adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to be exposed to overall anticholinergic polypharmacy (OR = 1.48 [1.33-1.66], p < 0.001), and to psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.79 [2.41-3.23], p < 0.001).
Adults with intellectual disabilities are exposed to a greater risk of having very high anticholinergic burden through polypharmacy from several classes of medications, which may be prescribed by several different prescribers. There is a need for evidence-based recommendations specifically about people with intellectual disabilities with multiple physical and mental ill-health conditions to optimise medication use, reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse anticholinergic effects.
与普通人群相比,智障人士可能面临更高的抗胆碱能负担风险及其负面后果,且涉及多种药物,年龄也更小,但此前相关研究较少。我们的目的是确定处方药物中抗胆碱能负担的来源。
采用记录链接进行回顾性匹配观察研究。将患有(n = 4305)和未患有(n = 12915)智障的成年人按年龄、性别和邻里贫困程度进行匹配。主要结局指标是总体长期(约使用12个月)抗胆碱能药物的处方情况(根据抗胆碱能风险量表[ARS]分类),按药物类别、个别药物和联合用药情况进行分析。
患有智障的1654名(38.4%)成年人和未患有智障的3047名(23.6%)成年人长期服用具有抗胆碱能作用的药物。在服用此类药物的人群中,患有智障的成年人最常服用的是中枢神经系统药物(62.6%)、胃肠道药物(46.7%)和心血管药物(28.4%)。与匹配的对照组相比,他们服用的中枢神经系统、妇科/泌尿道、肌肉骨骼和呼吸系统药物更多,而心血管、感染和内分泌系统药物更少。无论年龄、性别或邻里贫困程度如何,患有智障的成年人开具抗精神病药物(比值比[OR] = 5.37[4.40 - 6.57],p < 0.001)、抗癫痫药物(OR = 2.57[2.22 - 2.99],p < 0.001)和抗焦虑药/催眠药(OR = 1.28[1.06 - 1.56],p = 0.0)的几率更高。与普通人群相比,患有智障的成年人更有可能同时使用多种抗胆碱能药物(OR = 1.48[1.33 - 1.66],p < 0.001)和多种精神药物(OR = 2.79[2.41 - 3.23],p < 0.001)。
患有智障的成年人因多种药物联合使用而面临极高抗胆碱能负担的风险更高,这些药物可能由不同的开方者开具。需要针对患有多种身心健康问题的智障人士制定基于证据的建议,以优化药物使用,减少不适当的处方和不良抗胆碱能效应。