Suppr超能文献

难治性慢性丛集性头痛的预防性治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析

Preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Membrilla Javier A, Roa Javier, Díaz-de-Terán Javier

机构信息

Neurology Department, "La Paz" University Hospital, P.º de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2023 Feb;270(2):689-710. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11436-w. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventive treatment for refractory chronic cluster headache (rCCH) is challenging and many therapies have been tried.

OBJECTIVE

To study what could be considered the therapy of choice in rCCH through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021290983). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO's-International-Clinical-Trials-Registry-Platform. Studies on the preventive treatment for rCCH as defined by the European Headache Federation consensus statement were included. A meta-analysis of the pooled response rate was conducted for the different therapies.

RESULTS

Of 336 results, 45 were eligible for inclusion. Most articles studied the effect of neuromodulation as a preventive treatment for rCCH. The most studied neuromodulation technique was occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), with a pooled response rate in the meta-analysis of 57.3% (95% CI 0.481-0.665). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was the second most studied treatment with a pooled response rate of 77.0% (95% CI 0.594-0.957). DBS results were more heterogeneous than ONS, which could be related to the different stimulation targets in DBS studies, and reported more serious adverse events than in ONS studies. The remaining therapies (anti-CGRP pathway drugs, warfarin, ketamine-magnesium infusions, serial occipital nerve blocks, clomiphene, onabotulinum toxin A, ketogenic diet, sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency or stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, percutaneous bioelectric current stimulation, upper cervical cord stimulation, and vidian neurectomy) present weaker results or have less quality of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ONS could be the first therapeutic strategy for patients with rCCH based on the current evidence.

摘要

背景

难治性慢性丛集性头痛(rCCH)的预防性治疗具有挑战性,人们已经尝试了多种疗法。

目的

通过系统评价和荟萃分析,研究rCCH的首选治疗方法。

方法

本评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号CRD42021290983)。在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台上进行了系统检索。纳入了欧洲头痛联合会共识声明所定义的rCCH预防性治疗的研究。对不同疗法的合并缓解率进行了荟萃分析。

结果

在336条结果中,45条符合纳入标准。大多数文章研究了神经调节作为rCCH预防性治疗的效果。研究最多的神经调节技术是枕神经刺激(ONS),荟萃分析中的合并缓解率为57.3%(95%CI 0.481-0.665)。脑深部刺激(DBS)是研究第二多的治疗方法,合并缓解率为77.0%(95%CI 0.594-0.957)。DBS的结果比ONS更具异质性,这可能与DBS研究中的不同刺激靶点有关,且报告的严重不良事件比ONS研究更多。其余疗法(抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)途径药物、华法林、氯胺酮-镁输注、系列枕神经阻滞、克罗米芬、A型肉毒毒素、生酮饮食、蝶腭神经节射频或刺激、迷走神经刺激、经皮生物电流刺激、颈上脊髓刺激和岩大神经切除术)的结果较弱或证据质量较低。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,基于目前的证据,ONS可能是rCCH患者的首选治疗策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验