• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中后第一年社区和家庭日常生活手臂使用(REACH)评定量表评分的变化及其反应性。

Responsiveness and trajectory of changes in the rating of everyday arm-use in the community and home (REACH) scale over the first-year post-stroke.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Departments of Physiotherapy, Medicine (RMH) and 56369Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2023 Apr;37(4):557-568. doi: 10.1177/02692155221134413. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1177/02692155221134413
PMID:36310441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9989222/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the trajectory of the Rating of Everyday Arm-use in the Community and Home (REACH) scores over the first-year post-stroke, determine if REACH scores are modified by baseline impairment level and explore the responsiveness of the REACH scale through hypothesis testing.

DESIGN

Consecutive sample longitudinal study.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from an acute stroke unit and followed up at three, six, and 12 months post-stroke.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three participants with upper limb weakness (Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension score ≤ 8).

MAIN MEASURES

The REACH scale is a six-level self-report classification scale that captures how the affected upper limb is being used in one's own environment. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Assessment (FMA-UL), Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS), accelerometer-based activity count ratio and Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) were used to capture upper limb impairment, capacity, and use.

RESULTS

The following proportions of participants improved at least one REACH level: 64% from baseline to three months, 37% from three to six months and 13% from six to 12 months post-stroke. The trajectory of REACH scores over time was associated with baseline impairment. Change in REACH had a moderate correlation to change in SULCS and the GRCS but not FMA-UL or the activity count ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of hypothesis testing provide preliminary evidence of the responsiveness of the REACH scale. On average, individuals with severe impairment continued to show improvement in use over the first year, while those with mild/moderate impairment plateaued and a small proportion decreased in the early chronic phase.

摘要

目的

考察社区和家庭日常生活手臂使用评估(REACH)评分在中风后第一年的变化轨迹,确定 REACH 评分是否受基线损伤水平的影响,并通过假设检验探索 REACH 量表的反应能力。

设计

连续样本纵向研究。

地点

参与者从急性中风病房招募,并在中风后 3、6 和 12 个月进行随访。

参与者

73 名上肢无力(肩外展和手指伸展评分≤8)的患者。

主要措施

REACH 量表是一种六级自我报告分类量表,用于评估患侧上肢在自身环境中的使用情况。采用 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评定(FMA-UL)、中风上肢能力量表(SULCS)、基于加速度计的活动计数比和整体变化评级量表(GRCS)来评估上肢损伤、能力和使用情况。

结果

至少提高一个 REACH 级别的参与者比例如下:从基线到 3 个月时为 64%,从 3 个月到 6 个月时为 37%,从 6 个月到 12 个月时为 13%。REACH 评分随时间的轨迹与基线损伤有关。REACH 的变化与 SULCS 和 GRCS 的变化呈中度相关,但与 FMA-UL 或活动计数比无关。

结论

假设检验的结果提供了 REACH 量表反应能力的初步证据。平均而言,严重损伤的个体在第一年继续表现出使用的改善,而轻度/中度损伤的个体则在早期慢性阶段达到平台期,一小部分个体的使用情况下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/0377a837b88d/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/368c6ce1ff1e/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/2af08a0c88ab/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/0377a837b88d/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/368c6ce1ff1e/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/2af08a0c88ab/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed9/9989222/0377a837b88d/10.1177_02692155221134413-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Responsiveness and trajectory of changes in the rating of everyday arm-use in the community and home (REACH) scale over the first-year post-stroke.脑卒中后第一年社区和家庭日常生活手臂使用(REACH)评定量表评分的变化及其反应性。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Apr;37(4):557-568. doi: 10.1177/02692155221134413. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the SULCS.SULCS 的汇聚效度和反应度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):140-143.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.433. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Prognosis prediction of the effect of botulinum toxin therapy and intensive rehabilitation on the upper arm function in post-stroke patients using hierarchical cluster analysis.采用层次聚类分析预测脑卒中患者接受肉毒毒素治疗和强化康复对上臂功能效果的预后。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(22):6815-6823. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1977394. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke.将行动研究臂测试与Fugl-Meyer评估作为中风后上肢运动无力测量方法的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):962-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036.
5
The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version.上肢Fugl-Meyer评估:丹麦语版本的信度、反应度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):934-939. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1163422. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
6
The German version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale: Translation, cross-cultural adaption and evaluation of its psychometric properties.《脑卒中上肢能力量表》德语版:翻译、跨文化调适以及心理测量学特性评估。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Feb;36(2):272-282. doi: 10.1177/02692155211043502. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme.慢性脑卒中的强化上肢神经康复:来自伦敦国王学院的研究成果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 May;90(5):498-506. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
8
Characterising Arm Recovery in People with Severe Stroke (CARPSS): protocol for a 12-month observational study of clinical, neuroimaging and neurophysiological biomarkers.中文译文:严重中风患者上肢恢复特征研究(CARPSS):临床、神经影像学和神经生理学生物标志物的 12 个月观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e026435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026435.
9
Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: development, reliability, and validity.用于评估中风后受影响手臂使用情况的社区与家庭日常手臂使用评分(REACH)量表:开发、信度和效度
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e83405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083405. eCollection 2013.
10
Prediction of upper limb recovery, general disability, and rehabilitation status by activity measurements assessed by accelerometers or the Fugl-Meyer score in acute stroke.使用加速度计或 Fugl-Meyer 评分评估活动测量对上臂恢复、总体残疾和康复状况的预测在急性脑卒中中的应用。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;93(3):245-52. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000045.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Control Trial of a Virtually Delivered Program for Increasing Upper Limb Activity After Stroke.一项关于虚拟交付计划以增加中风后上肢活动的随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Mar;39(3):179-189. doi: 10.1177/15459683241303702. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery after stroke: the severely impaired are a distinct group.中风后的恢复:严重受损者是一个独特的群体。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;93(4):369-378. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327211. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Approaches Plateau Around Three to Six Weeks Post-stroke.上肢日常生活活动能力在卒中后 3 至 6 周左右趋于平台期。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Oct;35(10):903-914. doi: 10.1177/15459683211041302.
3
The influence of language comprehension proficiency on assessment of global cognitive impairment following Acquired Brain Injury: A comparison between MMSE, MoCA and CASP batteries.
语言理解能力对脑外伤后整体认知障碍评估的影响:MMSE、MoCA 和 CASP 三种量表的比较。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023;30(5):546-551. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1966430. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Challenges of Estimating Accurate Prevalence of Arm Weakness Early After Stroke.估算中风后早期手臂无力的准确患病率面临的挑战。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Oct;35(10):871-879. doi: 10.1177/15459683211028240. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
5
Whole-Body Movements Increase Arm Use Outcomes of Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in Stroke Patients.全身运动增加了腕戴加速度计在中风患者中对上肢使用结果的评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;21(13):4353. doi: 10.3390/s21134353.
6
Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity.临床流行病学中的关键概念:反应度,效度的纵向方面。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;140:159-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Objectively measured arm use in daily life improves during the first 6 months poststroke: a longitudinal observational cohort study.客观测量日常生活中的手臂使用在卒中后 6 个月内得到改善:一项纵向观察性队列研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Mar 19;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00847-x.
8
Improvement of the Upper Extremity at the Subacute Stage Poststroke: Does Hand Dominance Play a Role?脑卒中亚急性期上肢功能改善:手优势起作用吗?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Nov;34(11):1030-1037. doi: 10.1177/1545968320962502. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Recovery of upper limb function is greatest early after stroke but does continue to improve during the chronic phase: a two-year, observational study.上肢功能的恢复在卒中后早期最大,但在慢性期仍继续改善:一项为期两年的观察性研究。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model.预测脑卒中后上肢运动功能障碍的恢复:混合模型。
Ann Neurol. 2020 Mar;87(3):383-393. doi: 10.1002/ana.25679. Epub 2020 Jan 25.