• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发表于韩国护理期刊的产前护理干预研究:一项范围综述

Prenatal nursing intervention studies published in Korean nursing journals: a scoping review.

作者信息

Kim Seo Yun, Kim Hae Won

机构信息

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020 Jun 30;26(2):109-119. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.06.12. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

DOI:10.4069/kjwhn.2020.06.12
PMID:36310574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328601/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe prenatal nursing intervention studies on pregnant women and their families published in Korean nursing journals to identify research trends and to analyze the characteristics of intervention studies. This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We identified a research question and searched six domestic electronic databases for relevant articles. Forty-five references that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally selected. We extracted the data using an analytic framework, and then collated and summarized the characteristics of the intervention studies. The most frequently used research designs were non-randomized controlled trials (91.1%), and only a few studies applied a specific theoretical framework (24.4%). The participants were mainly pregnant women only (64.4%) during the third trimester (35.6%) of pregnancy. Prenatal education was the most common type of intervention (48.9%), followed by complementary therapy (37.8%) and psychosocial support programs (13.3%). The most commonly used outcome variables were drawn from the psychological domain (44.5%), although distinct types of outcome variables-especially from the psychological and physical domains-were used to measure the effectiveness of different types of prenatal interventions. This review suggests that further prenatal nursing intervention studies in Korea should expand the study participants to include pregnant women's family members, high-risk and vulnerable groups, and women throughout entire pregnancy. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop integrative prenatal nursing interventions that promote family support and participation by facilitating partnerships among women, families, and nurses before, during, and after pregnancy.

摘要

本研究旨在描述韩国护理期刊上发表的关于孕妇及其家庭的产前护理干预研究,以确定研究趋势并分析干预研究的特点。本范围综述采用了阿克西和奥马利的框架进行。我们确定了一个研究问题,并在六个国内电子数据库中搜索相关文章。最终筛选出45篇符合纳入和排除标准的参考文献。我们使用分析框架提取数据,然后整理并总结干预研究的特点。最常用的研究设计是非随机对照试验(91.1%),只有少数研究应用了特定的理论框架(24.4%)。参与者主要是仅孕妇(64.4%),处于妊娠晚期(35.6%)。产前教育是最常见的干预类型(48.9%),其次是辅助疗法(37.8%)和心理社会支持项目(13.3%)。最常用的结局变量来自心理领域(44.5%),尽管不同类型的结局变量——尤其是来自心理和身体领域的变量——被用于衡量不同类型产前干预的效果。本综述表明,韩国未来的产前护理干预研究应扩大研究参与者范围,纳入孕妇家庭成员、高危和弱势群体以及整个孕期的女性。此外,有必要开发综合性的产前护理干预措施,通过在怀孕前、期间和之后促进女性、家庭和护士之间的合作,来促进家庭支持和参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc1/9328601/770851820bf3/kjwhn-2020-06-12f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc1/9328601/770851820bf3/kjwhn-2020-06-12f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc1/9328601/770851820bf3/kjwhn-2020-06-12f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prenatal nursing intervention studies published in Korean nursing journals: a scoping review.发表于韩国护理期刊的产前护理干预研究:一项范围综述
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020 Jun 30;26(2):109-119. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.06.12. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Evolution of Phenomenology in Korean Nursing Research: A Scoping Review.韩国护理研究中现象学的演变:范围综述。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2024 Feb;18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Nursing Support for Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.癌症患者恶心和呕吐的护理支持:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 3;15(11):e48212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48212. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
7
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
8
Enhancing delirium assessment and management through nursing education interventions: A scoping review.通过护理教育干预增强谵妄评估和管理:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Feb;75:103887. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103887. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
9
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.强化范围研究方法学:一个大型跨专业团队对阿斯基和奥马利框架的应用经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
10
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and associated factors in immigrant pregnant women in Türkiye: A cross-sectional study.土耳其移民孕妇中抑郁、焦虑的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 29;102(52):e36616. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036616.
2
Development and application of a couple-centered antenatal education program in Korea.韩国夫妻-centered产前教育项目的开发与应用。 (注:这里“couple-centered”不太明确准确含义,可能是“以夫妻为中心的”之类表述,按原文翻译)
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021 Jun 30;27(2):141-152. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.06.20. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Participation in Prenatal Education, Knowledge and Attitude related to Delivery, Postpartum Care, Newborn Care in Nulliparous Women.初产妇参与产前教育、与分娩、产后护理、新生儿护理相关的知识和态度。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2016 Sep;22(3):139-150. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.139. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Systematic Review of Quantitative Research related to Maternal Adaptation among Women Immigrants by Marriage in Korea.韩国婚姻移民女性孕产妇适应相关定量研究的系统评价
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2015 Mar;21(1):55-70. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2015.21.1.55. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
3
Effect of Intervention Programs for Improving Maternal Adaptation in Korea: Systematic Review.
韩国改善孕产妇适应情况干预项目的效果:系统评价
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013 Sep;19(3):129-141. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.3.129. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
[An Integrative Review of Home Care Service for Pregnant Women, Mothers, Infants, and Toddlers in Vulnerable Group].[弱势群体中孕妇、母亲、婴儿和幼儿家庭护理服务的综合综述]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017 Oct;47(5):577-588. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.5.577.
5
Nurses' Unique Opportunity to Promote Patient Engagement in Prenatal Care.护士促进患者参与产前护理的独特机会。
Nurs Forum. 2018 Jan;53(1):61-68. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12210. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment.产前教育对分娩恐惧、产妇自我效能感和亲子依恋的影响。
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women.非常积极的分娩体验的意义:与女性进行的焦点小组讨论
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 9;15:251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0.
8
A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity.一种新开发的工具,用于对干预和暴露的系统评价研究设计进行分类,具有较高的可靠性和有效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
[Effects of a Mobile Web-based Pregnancy Health Care Educational Program for Mothers at an Advanced Maternal Age].基于移动网络的高龄孕产妇孕期保健教育项目的效果
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Jun;45(3):337-46. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.337.
10
Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.针对女性的群组式与传统产前护理对比研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.