• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生在在线识别考试与传统识别考试中的表现及认知研究。

A Study on the Performance and Perception of Medical students in Online Spotter versus Traditional Spotter Examinations.

作者信息

Arumugam Sangeetha, Kumar Subbiah Nandha, Jhansi Priya Sony

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, India.

Katuri Medical College and Hospital, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Oct;10(4):246-252. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.94591.1597.

DOI:10.30476/JAMP.2022.94591.1597
PMID:36310672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9589066/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical institutions around the world are exploring various newer modes of teaching and assessment methods to incorporate into the teaching curriculum. In this changing situation, e-learning methods are being widely used. For determining the effectiveness of a new learning method, assessment should be done since learning and assessment are intricately associated. One such newer method of testing practical anatomy knowledge is online spotter examination. The present study was conducted to correlate the students' performance between traditional and online spotter exam and analyse the students' perception about both exam patterns.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 120 first year medical students after obtaining ethical approval from the Institute Research and Ethics committee. Students were selected using simple random sampling method. Two modes of practical examination, traditional and online spotter, were conducted. After the examination, mean scores of OSE and TSE were compared using independent sample -test. A questionnaire was given to collect data on their perception about the exam pattern, and the responses were scored using Likert scale.

RESULTS

The performance mean score in online spotter exam was higher compared to traditional spotter exam. Analysis of the students' perception about the exam pattern revealed that they preferred the online examination. This could be attributed to advantages of online teaching and learning using audio-visual aids with good quality images (84=70%), easy to answer in multiple choice question (78=65%), quick results (108=90%), absence of bias in evaluation (108=90%), easy for future online postgraduate entrance exams (114=95%), and overall time limit and its advantages (84=70%);the only drawback was anxiety about internet connectivity (96=80%).

CONCLUSION

Online spotter exam can be conducted for routine formative assessment under controlled conditions to improve the students' knowledge and enhance their confidence and adaptability for future online exams.

摘要

引言

世界各地的医疗机构都在探索各种更新的教学模式和评估方法,以纳入教学课程。在这种不断变化的形势下,电子学习方法被广泛应用。为了确定一种新的学习方法的有效性,由于学习和评估密切相关,因此应该进行评估。在线现场评估考试就是一种测试实践解剖学知识的更新方法。本研究旨在比较传统现场评估考试和在线现场评估考试中学生的表现,并分析学生对这两种考试模式的看法。

方法

在获得学院研究与伦理委员会的伦理批准后,对120名一年级医学生进行了横断面描述性研究。采用简单随机抽样方法选取学生。进行了两种实践考试模式,即传统现场评估考试和在线现场评估考试。考试结束后,使用独立样本t检验比较OSE和TSE的平均分数。发放问卷收集他们对考试模式的看法数据,并使用李克特量表对回答进行评分。

结果

与传统现场评估考试相比,在线现场评估考试的成绩平均分更高。对学生对考试模式看法的分析表明,他们更喜欢在线考试。这可能归因于在线教学和学习的优势,如使用高质量图像的视听辅助工具(84人=70%)、易于回答多项选择题(78人=65%)、快速出结果(108人=90%)、评估无偏差(108人=90%)、便于未来的在线研究生入学考试(114人=95%)以及整体时间限制及其优势(84人=70%);唯一的缺点是担心网络连接问题(96人=80%)。

结论

在可控条件下,可以进行在线现场评估考试用于常规形成性评估,以提高学生的知识水平,增强他们对未来在线考试的信心和适应能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc7/9589066/a7a1aac71089/JAMP-10-246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc7/9589066/93aa40e576f5/JAMP-10-246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc7/9589066/a7a1aac71089/JAMP-10-246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc7/9589066/93aa40e576f5/JAMP-10-246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc7/9589066/a7a1aac71089/JAMP-10-246-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Study on the Performance and Perception of Medical students in Online Spotter versus Traditional Spotter Examinations.医学生在在线识别考试与传统识别考试中的表现及认知研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Oct;10(4):246-252. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.94591.1597.
2
Structured Online Modules and Near-Peer Teaching in Neuroanatomy Stimulate Active Learning and Can Have Beneficial Effects on Medical Students' Scores.神经解剖学中的结构化在线模块和近同伴教学激发主动学习,并可对医学生的成绩产生有益影响。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Sep 3;32(5):1077-1085. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01617-7. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Spot(ters) the difference: Bringing traditional anatomical examinations online.发现差异:将传统解剖学检查搬到线上。
Clin Anat. 2024 Apr;37(3):284-293. doi: 10.1002/ca.24092. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.评估本科生对人体解剖学实践评估方法的偏好:在线方法与传统方法的比较。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Apr;43(4):531-535. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02637-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
5
Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?总结性和形成性风格解剖学实践考试:它们对学生的表现和学习动力有影响吗?
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;13(5):581-590. doi: 10.1002/ase.1931. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
6
Blended Learning: The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students' perception of its effectiveness.混合式学习:黑板形成性评估对期末考试成绩及学生对其有效性认知的影响
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):327-332. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1925.
7
Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.学生在大体解剖学实践考试中的表现不受评估方式的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):111-20. doi: 10.1002/ase.1542. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Implementing Formative Assessment in Human Anatomy Practical Sessions: Medical Students' Perception and Effect on Final Exam Performance.在人体解剖学实践课程中实施形成性评估:医学生的认知及其对期末考试成绩的影响
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Jun 10;15:551-563. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S465384. eCollection 2024.
9
Evaluation of a 3D-MC examination format in anatomy.三维多点触控检查格式在解剖学中的评估。
Ann Anat. 2021 Jul;236:151666. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151666. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Considering medical students' perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams.考虑到医学生在 COVID-19 期间对电子考试的看法、担忧和需求:一种改进特定学科电子考试的有前景的方法。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2114131. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2114131.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional study of attitudes toward online continuing dental education in Libya during the COVID-19 pandemic.利比亚 COVID-19 大流行期间对在线继续教育态度的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0296783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296783. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.评估本科生对人体解剖学实践评估方法的偏好:在线方法与传统方法的比较。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Apr;43(4):531-535. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02637-x. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
2
Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在线学习是否优于本科医学教育中的离线学习?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
3
Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter's examination: an educational audit.
常见解剖定位检查的回顾性分析:一项教育审计
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Jun;31(2):115-124. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.123. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education.利用虚拟现实来补充和加强解剖学教育。
J Vis Commun Med. 2019 Jul;42(3):93-101. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2019.1597626. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.解剖学教育中的最佳教学实践:批判性综述。
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Online assessment in medical education-current trends and future directions.医学教育中的在线评估——当前趋势与未来方向
Malawi Med J. 2015 Jun;27(2):71-2. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v27i2.8.
7
Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.学生在大体解剖学实践考试中的表现不受评估方式的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):111-20. doi: 10.1002/ase.1542. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Learning styles of medical students - implications in education.医学生的学习风格——对教育的启示
Curr Health Sci J. 2014 Apr-Jun;40(2):104-10. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.40.02.04. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
9
The Blooming Anatomy Tool (BAT): A discipline-specific rubric for utilizing Bloom's taxonomy in the design and evaluation of assessments in the anatomical sciences.绽放解剖学工具(BAT):一种用于在解剖学科学评估的设计和评估中运用布鲁姆分类法的特定学科评分标准。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):493-501. doi: 10.1002/ase.1507. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there?解剖学知识的现状:我们现在在哪里?我们需要去哪里,我们如何到达那里?
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(2):184-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.883985.