• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院获得性成人脓毒症事件监测应该成为常规……甚至是强制性的吗?

Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?

作者信息

Rhee Chanu, Klompas Michael

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 28;2(1):e32. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.16. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2022.16
PMID:36310798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9614833/
Abstract

Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%-15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources.

摘要

医院获得性脓毒症占所有脓毒症病例的10%-15%,且与极高的死亡率相关,但迄今为止,大多数医院很少关注追踪其发病率和转归情况。这与医院和监管机构花费大量精力追踪和报告有限的一部分医疗相关感染形成了鲜明对比。然而,美国疾病控制与预防中心近期制定的医院获得性成人脓毒症事件(ASE)定义,为医疗机构提供了一种经过验证的标准化机制,可利用常规可得的电子健康记录数据识别医院感染性脓毒症患者。近期数据表明,医院获得性ASE监测能识别出许多当前可报告的医疗相关感染很大程度上遗漏的感染,且这些感染与高得多的死亡率相关。将监测范围扩大到包括这些后果严重的感染,有助于确定预防和质量改进的新目标,并最终为住院患者带来更好的转归。然而,还需要开展更多工作来明确医院获得性ASE的可预防性,开发并验证强大的病例组合调整工具,并推动资源有限的医院广泛采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fe/9614833/ff72f6f6f4bf/S2732494X2200016X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fe/9614833/684f99947d7c/S2732494X2200016X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fe/9614833/ff72f6f6f4bf/S2732494X2200016X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fe/9614833/684f99947d7c/S2732494X2200016X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fe/9614833/ff72f6f6f4bf/S2732494X2200016X_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?医院获得性成人脓毒症事件监测应该成为常规……甚至是强制性的吗?
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 28;2(1):e32. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.16. eCollection 2022.
2
Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Hospital-Onset Adult Sepsis Events Versus Current Reportable Conditions.医疗机构相关性感染监测:医院获得性成人脓毒症事件与现行应报告条件比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):1013-1019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab217.
3
Risk Adjustment for Sepsis Mortality to Facilitate Hospital Comparisons Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Adult Sepsis Event Criteria and Routine Electronic Clinical Data.使用疾病控制与预防中心的成人脓毒症事件标准和常规电子临床数据对脓毒症死亡率进行风险调整以促进医院间比较。
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Oct 14;1(10):e0049. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000049. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Surveillance Strategies for Tracking Sepsis Incidence and Outcomes.追踪脓毒症发病率和结局的监测策略。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S74-S83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa102.
5
Benchmarking for prevention: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system experience.预防的基准:疾病控制与预防中心国家医院感染监测(NNIS)系统的经验
Infection. 2003 Dec;31 Suppl 2:44-8.
6
Comparison of 2 Clostridium difficile surveillance methods: National Healthcare Safety Network's laboratory-identified event reporting module versus clinical infection surveillance.两种艰难梭菌监测方法的比较:国家医疗保健安全网络的实验室鉴定事件报告模块与临床感染监测。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):284-90. doi: 10.1086/669509. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
7
Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data.基于 Sepsis-3 临床标准的自动化脓毒症监测在综合医院人群中对医师记录审查的验证:使用电子健康记录数据的观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):735-745. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010123. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.
10
Tuberculosis结核病

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.用于区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征(qSOFA 和 SOFA)的脓毒症预测模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29729.

本文引用的文献

1
Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Hospital-Onset Adult Sepsis Events Versus Current Reportable Conditions.医疗机构相关性感染监测:医院获得性成人脓毒症事件与现行应报告条件比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):1013-1019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab217.
2
Association Between Federal Value-Based Incentive Programs and Health Care-Associated Infection Rates in Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals.联邦基于价值的激励计划与安全网和非安全网医院的医疗保健相关感染率之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209700. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9700.
3
Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management With Mortality Among Patients With Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis.
早期脓毒症管理护理包与医院获得性或社区获得性脓毒症患者死亡率的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):707-716. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0183.
4
Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?脓毒症趋势:发病率上升与死亡率下降,还是分母变化?
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S89-S100. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51.
5
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的败血症:1. 2012-2018 年败血症负担。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):276-288. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224.
6
Adherence to the SEP-1 Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset v. Community-Onset Sepsis: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.医院获得性 SEP-1 脓毒症集束与社区获得性脓毒症集束的依从性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1153-1160. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05653-0. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
8
Development and Assessment of Objective Surveillance Definitions for Nonventilator Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.非呼吸机相关性医院获得性肺炎的客观监测定义的制定和评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13674.
9
Epidemiology of Hospital-Onset Versus Community-Onset Sepsis in U.S. Hospitals and Association With Mortality: A Retrospective Analysis Using Electronic Clinical Data.美国医院中医院获得性与社区获得性脓毒症的流行病学:一项使用电子临床数据的回顾性分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1169-1176. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003817.
10
Preventability of hospital onset bacteremia and fungemia: A pilot study of a potential healthcare-associated infection outcome measure.医院获得性菌血症和真菌血症的可预防性:一种潜在的医疗保健相关性感染结局测量方法的初步研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):358-361. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.339. Epub 2019 Feb 18.