Szebeni Zea, Lönnqvist Jan-Erik, Jasinskaja-Lahti Inga
Swedish School of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021.
Accessing information online is now easier than ever. However, also false information is circulated in increasing quantities. We sought to identify social psychological factors that could explain why some people are more susceptible to false information. Specifically, we investigated whether psychological predispositions (social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, system justification beliefs (SJB), openness, need for closure, conspiracy mentality), competencies (scientific and political knowledge, interest in politics) or motivated reasoning based on social identity (political orientation) could help explain who believes fake news. Hungarian participants ( = 295) judged political (anti- and pro-government) and non-political news. The Hungarian context-characterized by low trust in media, populist communication by the government and increasing polarization-should be fertile ground for the proliferation of fake news. The context in making this case particularly interesting is that the major political fault line in Hungary runs between pro- and anti-government supporter groups and not, for instance, between conservative and liberal ideology or partisanship. We found clear support for the motivational reasoning explanation as political orientation consistently predicted belief in both fake and real political news when their contents aligned with one's political identity. The belief in pro-government news was also associated with higher SJB among pro-government supporters. Those interested in politics showed better capacity to distinguish real political news from the fake ones. Most importantly, the only psychological predisposition that consistently explained belief in all types of fake news was a conspiracy mentality. This supports the notion of ideological symmetry in fake news belief-where a conspiracy mentality can be found across the political spectrum, and it can make people susceptible to disinformation regardless of group-memberships and other individual differences.
现在,在线获取信息比以往任何时候都更容易。然而,虚假信息的传播数量也在不断增加。我们试图找出一些社会心理因素,来解释为什么有些人更容易受到虚假信息的影响。具体而言,我们调查了心理倾向(社会支配取向、右翼威权主义、系统正当化信念(SJB)、开放性、认知闭合需求、阴谋心态)、能力(科学和政治知识、政治兴趣)或基于社会身份的动机性推理(政治取向)是否有助于解释谁会相信假新闻。匈牙利参与者(N = 295)对政治新闻(反政府和亲政府)和非政治新闻进行了评判。匈牙利的情况——其特点是对媒体信任度低、政府进行民粹主义宣传以及两极分化加剧——应该是假新闻泛滥的沃土。使这个案例特别有趣的背景是,匈牙利主要的政治分歧存在于亲政府和反政府支持群体之间,而不是,例如,保守和自由意识形态或党派之间。我们发现有力支持了动机性推理解释,因为当政治新闻的内容与个人政治身份一致时,政治取向始终能预测对真假政治新闻的相信程度。亲政府支持者对亲政府新闻的相信也与更高的系统正当化信念相关。对政治感兴趣的人表现出更强的能力,能够区分真实的政治新闻和虚假的政治新闻。最重要的是,唯一能始终解释对各类假新闻相信程度的心理倾向是阴谋心态。这支持了假新闻信念中意识形态对称性的观点——在整个政治光谱中都能发现阴谋心态,而且无论群体成员身份和其他个体差异如何,它都会使人们容易受到虚假信息的影响。