Strategies to improve the quality of reporting nursing research.
作者信息
Song Ju-Eun
机构信息
College of Nursing, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
出版信息
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022 Jun 30;28(2):77-82. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.06.08.1. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Strategies to improve the quality of reporting nursing research.提高护理研究报告质量的策略。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022 Jun 30;28(2):77-82. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.06.08.1. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Reporting quality for abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research.癌症护理研究中随机对照试验摘要的报告质量。
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):436-44. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000112.
3
Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research.癌症护理研究中随机对照试验报告质量。
Nurs Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;63(1):26-35. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000007.
4
Quality Improvement Efforts in VA Community Living Centers Following Public Reporting of Performance.VA 社区生活中心在公开报告绩效后进行质量改进工作。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):118-140. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2196913. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care.公共报告对急性后期护理质量的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1169-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00967.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement.护理与医学期刊发表的儿科随机对照试验质量比较：对 CONSORT 声明的遵循情况。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Dec;15(6):447-454. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12329. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
7
What influences nursing safety event reporting among nursing interns?: Focus group study.什么因素影响护理实习生报告护理安全事件？：焦点小组研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
8
Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science.实验护理研究中的偏倚：提高护理科学质量和解释力的策略。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jan;47(1):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
Characteristics and quality of reporting qualitative nursing research related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic search and critical review.与 COVID-19 大流行相关的定性护理研究报告的特征与质量：一项系统检索与批判性综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 22;23(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02138-x.
10
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.强制要求养老院参与质量报告有作用吗？来自马萨诸塞州的证据。
Med Care. 2015 Aug;53(8):713-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000390.
引用本文的文献
1
Evolution of Research Reporting Standards: Adapting to the Influence of Artificial Intelligence, Statistics Software, and Writing Tools.研究报告标准的演变：适应人工智能、统计软件和写作工具的影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 19;39(32):e231. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e231.
2
Investing in women's health, continuing the journey, one manuscript at a time.投资于女性健康，一次一份手稿，继续前行。
Womens Health Nurs. 2024 Mar;30(1):6-8. doi: 10.4069/whn.2024.03.21. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Connecting authors with readers: what makes a good review for the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.连接作者与读者：如何为《韩国女性健康护理杂志》撰写一篇优秀的综述
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023 Mar;29(1):1-4. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.02.23. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
本文引用的文献
1
Analysis on Reports of Qualitative Researches Published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.《韩国女性健康护理杂志》发表的定性研究报告分析
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2012 Dec;18(4):321-332. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2012.18.4.321. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
2
Analysis of Reports on Observational Studies Published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing based on the STROBE Guideline.基于STROBE指南对发表于《韩国女性健康护理杂志》的观察性研究报告的分析
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2014 Dec;20(4):287-296. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.4.287. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
The Quality of Reporting of Intervention Studies in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN): Based on the TREND Guidelines.《韩国女性健康护理杂志》（KJWHN）中干预性研究报告的质量：基于TREND指南
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013 Dec;19(4):306-317. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.306. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
4
GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines.好报告：开发一个网站，帮助健康研究人员查找和使用报告指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01402-x.
5
On the Use and Value of Reporting Guidelines in Health Professions Education Research.报告指南在卫生专业教育研究中的应用与价值
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1619-1622. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003666.
6
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.提高学术出版的透明度和科学严谨性。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;2(1):e1150. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1150. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
7
Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.影响和感知价值的期刊报告指南放射学作者和审稿人。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):3986-3995. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5980-3. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers.报告规范：为读者做得更好。
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 14;16(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1226-0.
9
Hoping for a TREND toward PRISMA: the variety and value of research reporting guidelines.期待向PRISMA发展的趋势：研究报告指南的多样性和价值。
Res Nurs Health. 2014 Apr;37(2):85-7. doi: 10.1002/nur.21591. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals.是否鼓励同行评审员使用报告指南？对 116 种健康研究期刊的调查。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035621. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
Zotero 插件