Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗在局部晚期结肠癌患者中的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Liang Zongyu, Li Zhu, Yang Qingshui, Feng Jiahao, Xiang Deyu, Lyu Haina, Mai Guangzhi, Wang Wanchuan

机构信息

Second Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 11;12:1024345. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024345. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists about neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) within the field of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). The purpose of this study was to assess the existing and latest literature with high quality to determine the role of NAC in various aspects.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 2022. Review Manager 5.3 was applied for meta-analyses with a random-effects model whenever possible.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, comprising 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies involving 40,136 participants. The 3-year overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.66-1.23, P = 0.51) and 5-year OS (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.03, P = 0.53) were comparable between two groups. Mortality in 30 days was found less frequent in the NAC group (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas no significant differences were detected concerning other perioperative complications, R0 resection, or adverse events. In terms of subgroup analyses for RCTs, less anastomotic leak (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, P = 0.01) and higher R0 resection rate (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.04-5.32, P = 0.04) were observed in the NAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC is safe and feasible for patients with LACC, but no significant survival benefit could be demonstrated. The application of NAC still needs to be prudent until significant evidence supporting the oncological outcomes is presented.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42022333306).

摘要

背景

在局部晚期结肠癌(LACC)领域,新辅助化疗(NAC)仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估现有高质量和最新文献,以确定NAC在各个方面的作用。

方法

对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2022年4月。只要有可能,就使用Review Manager 5.3采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

总体而言,本系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了8项研究,包括4项随机对照试验(RCT)和4项回顾性研究,涉及40136名参与者。两组的3年总生存率(OS)(风险比:0.90,95%置信区间:0.66 - 1.23,P = 0.51)和5年总生存率(风险比:0.89,95%置信区间:0.53 - 1.03,P = 0.53)相当。发现NAC组30天内的死亡率较低(优势比:0.43,95%置信区间:0.20 - 0.91,P = 0.03),而在其他围手术期并发症、R0切除或不良事件方面未发现显著差异。在RCT的亚组分析中,NAC组吻合口漏较少(优势比:0.51,95%置信区间:0.31 - 0.86,P = 0.01),R0切除率较高(优势比:2.35,95%置信区间:1.04 - 5.32,P = 0.04)。

结论

NAC对LACC患者是安全可行的,但未显示出显著的生存获益。在有支持肿瘤学结局的重要证据出现之前,NAC的应用仍需谨慎。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero,标识符(CRD42022333306)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验