Wang Qiancheng, Jin Shiyang, Wang Zeshen, Ju Yuming, Wang Kuan
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2025 Dec;26(1):2441511. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2441511. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven valuable in treating locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) and is included as a treatment option for patients with clinical T4b colon cancer by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. However, the long-term survival benefit of NAC in LACC remains debated, due to a lack of conclusive clinical trial results identifying the patients who would benefit most from NAC. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of NAC in patients with LACC based on histological subtype.
This retrospective study analyzed 3,709 patients with LACC who underwent curative resection at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between 2014 and 2018. Patients were grouped into two groups: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for confounders, and survival outcomes of the two groups across different histological subtypes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and log-rank tests.
Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) treated with NAC had a significantly improved 5-year OS rate (76.3% vs. 69.2%, = .039) and DFS rate (67.2% vs. 60.1%, = .041) compared with patients treated with AC. However, there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between the two treatment groups among patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).
In patients with LACC, the prognostic value of NAC varied by histology. NMAC may serve as a predictor of improved long-term survival benefit from NAC in these patients.
新辅助化疗(NAC)已被证明在治疗局部晚期结肠癌(LACC)方面具有价值,美国国立综合癌症网络将其列为临床T4b结肠癌患者的一种治疗选择。然而,由于缺乏确定哪些患者能从NAC中获益最多的确凿临床试验结果,NAC在LACC中的长期生存获益仍存在争议。本研究旨在基于组织学亚型评估NAC对LACC患者的疗效。
这项回顾性研究分析了2014年至2018年间在哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院接受根治性切除的3709例LACC患者。患者被分为两组:新辅助化疗(NAC)组和辅助化疗(AC)组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整混杂因素,并使用Kaplan-Meier(K-M)曲线和对数秩检验评估两组在不同组织学亚型中的生存结局。
与接受AC治疗的患者相比,接受NAC治疗的非黏液腺癌(NMAC)患者的5年总生存率(OS)(76.3%对69.2%,P = 0.039)和无病生存率(DFS)(67.2%对60.1%,P = 0.041)显著提高。然而,在黏液腺癌(MAC)和印戒细胞癌(SRCC)患者中,两组治疗之间的OS和DFS没有显著差异。
在LACC患者中,NAC的预后价值因组织学类型而异。NMAC可能是这些患者从NAC中获得改善的长期生存获益的一个预测指标。