Zhou Ke, Bellanger Martine, Le Lann Sophie, Robert Marie, Frenel Jean-Sebastien, Campone Mario
Department of Human and Social Sciences, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
UMR CNRS6051 Rennes1 - EHESP School of Public Health, Rennes, France.
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;12:925534. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925534. eCollection 2022.
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been widely used to measure breast cancer (BC) treatment outcomes. However, evidence is still limited on using routinely PROs to personalize treatment decision-making, including or not chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Using patient baseline PRO scores, we aimed to use PROs before treatment initiation to predict improvement or decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to treatment that they receive.
In two French cancer sites, women with non-metastatic BC completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and BREAST-Q questionnaires to assess their PROs at baseline and again at 6 months. The outcome measured was post-operative change in PROs with minimal important difference for QLQ-C30 domains. We performed multivariate ordinal logistic regression to estimate the incremental probability of post-operative PRO improvements and deteriorations depending upon treatment options and baseline HRQoL.
One hundred twenty-seven women completed questionnaires. Chemotherapy had significant negative impacts on Global health status (GHS) and on physical and social functioning. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased patient fatigue scores after adjusting for clinical factors (p< 0.01 and p< 0.05, respectively). The incremental probability of GHS deteriorations for chemotherapy was +0.3, +0.5, and +0.34 for patients with baseline GHS scores of 40, 70, and 100, respectively. This showed that different pre-treatment PROs might predict differential effects of chemotherapy on women change in HRQoL.
Patients with different baseline PRO scores may experience dissimilar impacts from BC treatments on post-operative PROs in terms of improvements and deteriorations. Oncologists might decide to adapt the treatment option based on a given level of the negative impact. Future studies should concentrate on incorporating this information into routine clinical decision-making strategies to optimize the treatment benefit for patients.
患者报告结局(PROs)已被广泛用于衡量乳腺癌(BC)治疗效果。然而,关于使用常规PROs来个性化治疗决策(包括是否进行化疗、靶向治疗和放疗)的证据仍然有限。我们旨在利用患者基线PRO评分,在治疗开始前使用PROs来预测患者接受治疗后健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的改善或下降情况。
在法国的两个癌症治疗点,患有非转移性BC的女性完成了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30、QLQ-BR23和BREAST-Q问卷,以在基线时以及6个月后再次评估她们的PROs。所测量的结局是PROs的术后变化,其中QLQ-C30各领域的最小重要差异。我们进行了多变量有序逻辑回归,以估计根据治疗方案和基线HRQoL术后PRO改善和恶化的增量概率。
127名女性完成了问卷。化疗对总体健康状况(GHS)以及身体和社会功能有显著负面影响。在调整临床因素后,化疗和放疗增加了患者的疲劳评分(分别为p<0.01和p<0.05)。对于基线GHS评分为40、70和100的患者,化疗导致GHS恶化的增量概率分别为+0.3、+0.5和+0.34。这表明不同的治疗前PROs可能预测化疗对女性HRQoL变化的不同影响。
不同基线PRO评分的患者在术后PROs的改善和恶化方面可能会受到BC治疗不同的影响。肿瘤学家可能会根据给定的负面影响水平决定调整治疗方案。未来的研究应集中于将这些信息纳入常规临床决策策略,以优化患者的治疗获益。