Beijing Institute of Genomicsgrid.464209.d, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0127022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01270-22. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
The emergence of a new type of COVID-19 patients, who were retested positive after hospital discharge with long-term persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection but without COVID-19 clinical symptoms (hereinafter, LTPPs), poses novel challenges to COVID-19 treatment and prevention. Why was there such a contradictory phenomenon in LTPPs? To explore the mechanism underlying this phenomenon, we performed quantitative proteomic analyses using the sera of 12 LTPPs (Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital), with the longest carrying history of 132 days, and mainly focused on 7 LTPPs without hypertension (LTPPs-NH). The results showed differential serum protein profiles between LTPPs/LTPPs-NH and health controls. Further analysis identified 174 differentially-expressed-proteins (DEPs) for LTPPs, and 165 DEPs for LTPPs-NH, most of which were shared. GO and KEGG analyses for these DEPs revealed significant enrichment of "coagulation" and "immune response" in both LTPPs and LTPPs-NH. A unity of contradictory genotypes in the 2 aspects were then observed: some DEPs showed the same dysregulated expressed trend as that previously reported for patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, which might be caused by long-term stimulation of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in LTPPs, further preventing them from complete elimination; in contrast, some DEPs showed the opposite expression trend in expression, so as to retain control of COVID-19 clinical symptoms in LTPPs. Overall, the contrary effects of these DEPs worked together to maintain the balance of LTPPs, further endowing their contradictory steady-state with long-term persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection but without symptoms. Additionally, our study revealed some potential therapeutic targets of COVID-19. Further studies on these are warranted. This study reported a new type of COVID-19 patients and explored the underlying molecular mechanism by quantitative proteomic analyses. DEPs were significantly enriched in "coagulation" and "immune response". Importantly, we identified 7 "coagulation system"- and 9 "immune response"-related DEPs, the expression levels of which were consistent with those previously reported for patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, which appeared to play a role in avoiding the complete elimination of SARS-CoV-2 in LTPPs. On the contrary, 6 "coagulation system"- and 5 "immune response"-related DEPs showed the opposite trend in expression. The 11 inconsistent serum proteins seem to play a key role in the fight against long-term persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, further retaining control of COVID-19 clinical symptom of LTPPs. The 26 proteins can serve as potential therapeutic targets and are thus valuable for the treatment of LTPPs; further studies on them are warranted.
出现了一种新型的 COVID-19 患者,他们在出院后长期持续性 SARS-CoV-2 感染但没有 COVID-19 临床症状(以下简称 LTPPs)后重新检测呈阳性,这对 COVID-19 的治疗和预防提出了新的挑战。为什么 LTPPs 中会出现这种矛盾的现象?为了探讨这种现象的机制,我们使用来自 12 名 LTPPs(武汉肺科医院)的血清进行了定量蛋白质组学分析,最长携带史为 132 天,主要集中在 7 名没有高血压的 LTPPs(LTPPs-NH)上。结果显示 LTPPs/LTPPs-NH 与健康对照之间存在不同的血清蛋白图谱。进一步分析鉴定了 LTPPs 的 174 个差异表达蛋白(DEPs)和 LTPPs-NH 的 165 个 DEPs,其中大部分是共有的。这些 DEPs 的 GO 和 KEGG 分析显示,“凝血”和“免疫反应”在 LTPPs 和 LTPPs-NH 中都有显著富集。然后观察到这两个方面矛盾基因型的统一:一些 DEPs 表现出与 COVID-19 急性期患者先前报道的相同的失调表达趋势,这可能是由于 LTPPs 中持续性 SARS-CoV-2 感染的长期刺激,进一步阻止了它们的完全消除;相反,一些 DEPs 的表达趋势相反,从而在 LTPPs 中保留了对 COVID-19 临床症状的控制。总的来说,这些 DEPs 的相反作用共同维持了 LTPPs 的平衡,从而赋予了它们长期持续性 SARS-CoV-2 感染但无症状的矛盾稳定状态。此外,我们的研究还揭示了 COVID-19 的一些潜在治疗靶点。值得进一步研究这些靶点。本研究报道了一种新型 COVID-19 患者,并通过定量蛋白质组学分析探讨了其潜在的分子机制。DEPs 在“凝血”和“免疫反应”中显著富集。重要的是,我们鉴定了 7 个“凝血系统”和 9 个“免疫反应”相关的 DEPs,其表达水平与 COVID-19 急性期患者的表达水平一致,这似乎在避免 LTPPs 中 SARS-CoV-2 的完全消除方面发挥了作用。相反,6 个“凝血系统”和 5 个“免疫反应”相关的 DEPs 表现出相反的表达趋势。11 个不一致的血清蛋白似乎在与长期持续性 SARS-CoV-2 感染作斗争中发挥了关键作用,从而进一步保留了 LTPPs 的 COVID-19 临床症状的控制。这 26 种蛋白质可以作为潜在的治疗靶点,因此对 LTPPs 的治疗具有重要价值;进一步的研究是必要的。