Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Evolution of Cultural Diversity Initiative, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec;6(12):2003-2015. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01914-9. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
The role of natural selection in shaping biological diversity is an area of intense interest in modern biology. To date, studies of positive selection have primarily relied on genomic datasets from contemporary populations, which are susceptible to confounding factors associated with complex and often unknown aspects of population history. In particular, admixture between diverged populations can distort or hide prior selection events in modern genomes, though this process is not explicitly accounted for in most selection studies despite its apparent ubiquity in humans and other species. Through analyses of ancient and modern human genomes, we show that previously reported Holocene-era admixture has masked more than 50 historic hard sweeps in modern European genomes. Our results imply that this canonical mode of selection has probably been underappreciated in the evolutionary history of humans and suggest that our current understanding of the tempo and mode of selection in natural populations may be inaccurate.
自然选择在塑造生物多样性方面的作用是现代生物学中一个非常关注的领域。迄今为止,对正选择的研究主要依赖于来自当代群体的基因组数据集,这些数据集容易受到与群体历史复杂且通常未知的方面有关的混杂因素的影响。特别是,分化群体之间的混合可能会扭曲或隐藏现代基因组中以前的选择事件,尽管在大多数选择研究中并没有明确考虑到这一过程,尽管它在人类和其他物种中普遍存在。通过对古代和现代人类基因组的分析,我们表明,以前报道的全新世时期的混合掩盖了现代欧洲基因组中超过 50 次历史上的硬选择事件。我们的研究结果表明,这种典型的选择模式在人类的进化历史中可能被低估了,这表明我们目前对自然群体中选择的时空调控模式的理解可能是不准确的。