Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Center for Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4117-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04665-1. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
Intramedullary humeral nailing is a common and reliable procedure for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Radial nerve palsy is a common complication encountered in the treatment of this pathology. The radial nerve runs from posterior to anterior at the lateral aspect of the distal humerus. Hence, there is reason to believe that due to the anatomic vicinity of the radial nerve in this area, lateral-medial distal locking in intramedullary nailing of the humerus may be associated with a greater risk for iatrogenic radial nerve injury compared to anterior-posterior locking.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: To assess whether the choice of distal locking (lateral-medial versus anterior-posterior distal locking) in intramedullary humeral nailing of humeral shaft fractures affects the risk for iatrogenic radial nerve injury.
Overall, 203 patients (116 females, mean age 64.3 ± 18.6 years), who underwent intramedullary nailing of the humerus between 2000 and 2020 at a single level-one trauma center, met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this retrospective case-control study. Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the distal locking technique.
Anterior-posterior locking was performed in 176 patients versus lateral-medial locking in 27 patients. We observed four patients with iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in both groups. Risk for iatrogenic radial nerve palsy was almost 7.5 times higher for lateral-medial locking (OR 7.48, p = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference regarding intraoperative complications, union rates or revision surgeries between both groups.
Lateral-medial distal locking in intramedullary nailing of the humerus may be associated with a greater risk for iatrogenic radial nerve palsy than anterior-posterior locking. Hence, we advocate for anterior-posterior locking.
Level III retrospective comparative study.
髓内肱骨钉固定术是治疗肱骨骨干骨折的一种常见且可靠的方法。桡神经麻痹是治疗这种病理时常见的并发症。桡神经在肱骨远端的外侧从前向后走行。因此,有理由相信,由于桡神经在该区域的解剖位置接近,与前-后锁定相比,髓内肱骨钉固定时的外侧-内侧远端锁定可能与医源性桡神经损伤的风险增加相关。
问题/目的:评估肱骨骨干骨折髓内钉固定时选择远端锁定(外侧-内侧与前-后远端锁定)是否会影响医源性桡神经损伤的风险。
总体而言,203 名患者(116 名女性,平均年龄 64.3±18.6 岁),在一家一级创伤中心于 2000 年至 2020 年期间接受了髓内肱骨钉固定术,符合纳入标准,并在这项回顾性病例对照研究中进行了分析。根据远端锁定技术将患者分为两组。
176 名患者采用前-后锁定,27 名患者采用外侧-内侧锁定。我们观察到两组均有 4 名患者发生医源性桡神经麻痹。外侧-内侧锁定的医源性桡神经麻痹风险几乎高 7.5 倍(OR 7.48,p=0.006)。两组之间的术中并发症、愈合率或翻修手术率均无统计学差异。
与前-后锁定相比,髓内肱骨钉固定时的外侧-内侧远端锁定可能与医源性桡神经麻痹的风险增加相关。因此,我们主张采用前-后锁定。
三级回顾性比较研究。