Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 28;101(43):e31279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031279.
Different researchers have studied the effects of different types of stretching on different muscle groups. Since distal muscles are fully activated and proximal muscles are sub-optimally activated; thus, we might see different responses to stretching in the proximal and distal groups of muscles depending on their muscle activation. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the acute effects of 2, 4, and 8 minutes of intermittent static stretching (SS) on the isometric maximum voluntary contraction force (MVCF) of proximal (Hamstring) and distal (Calf) groups of muscles.
Two groups pretest-posttest experimental design was used. A total of thirty participants were randomly assigned into two groups, and twenty-eight completed the intervention. In both groups, participants participated in three experimental trials (SS2, SS4, and SS8) on 3 days. 2-minute intermittent stretching (SS2) was performed on day-I, 4-minute (SS4) on day II, and 8-minute (SS8) on day III. Isometric MVCF was measured at pre-intervention, 0-, 10-, and 20-minute post-intervention periods in both groups.
In the proximal group: SS2, SS4, and SS8 did not affect isometric MVCF at the 0-, 10-, and 20-minute post-intervention periods (P > .05). In distal group: SS2 did not affect isometric MVCF at 0- and 10-minute post-intervention periods (P > .05), however at 20-minute, MVCF increased by 11.06% (P < .05). SS4 and SS8 also did not alter isometric MVCF in the Calf at 0-, 10-, and 20-minute post-intervention periods (P > .05). No significant differences were observed between the proximal and distal groups (P > .05).
2-, 4-, and 8-minute intermittent SS did not affect the isometric strength in both muscle groups. In addition, proximal and distal groups of muscles responded similarly to three different duration intermittent SS.
不同的研究人员研究了不同类型的拉伸对不同肌肉群的影响。由于远端肌肉被充分激活,而近端肌肉被亚最佳激活;因此,我们可能会根据肌肉激活的不同,在近端和远端肌肉群中看到不同的拉伸反应。因此,本研究旨在比较 2 分钟、4 分钟和 8 分钟间歇性静态拉伸(SS)对近端(腘绳肌)和远端(小腿)肌肉群等长最大自主收缩力(MVCF)的急性影响。
采用两组前后测实验设计。共有 30 名参与者被随机分配到两组,其中 28 名完成了干预。在两组中,参与者在 3 天内参加了 3 次实验试验(SS2、SS4 和 SS8)。第 1 天进行 2 分钟间歇性拉伸(SS2),第 2 天进行 4 分钟(SS4),第 3 天进行 8 分钟(SS8)。在两组中,在干预前、0 分钟、10 分钟和 20 分钟后测量等长 MVCF。
在近端组中:SS2、SS4 和 SS8 在 0 分钟、10 分钟和 20 分钟后均不影响等长 MVCF(P >.05)。在远端组中:SS2 在 0 分钟和 10 分钟后不影响等长 MVCF(P >.05),但在 20 分钟时,MVCF 增加了 11.06%(P <.05)。SS4 和 SS8 也未改变小腿在 0 分钟、10 分钟和 20 分钟后的等长 MVCF(P >.05)。近端和远端组之间无显著差异(P >.05)。
2 分钟、4 分钟和 8 分钟间歇性 SS 不影响两组的等长强度。此外,近端和远端肌肉群对三种不同持续时间的间歇性 SS 的反应相似。