Physical Education Post-Graduation Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Physical Education Post-Graduation Program, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):745-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc236a.
The purpose of this study was to assess the acute effects of the static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching methods on local muscular endurance performance at intensities between 40 and 80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the knee extension (KE) and bench press (BP) exercises. Fifteen male volunteers (23.9 ± 4.3 years; 174.5 ± 8.5 cm; and 77.8 ± 7.6 kg), who were nonathletes but had previous experience in resistance training, volunteered for this study. Participants were assigned to 9 randomly ordered experimental conditions, in which all subjects performed endurance tests at 40, 60, and 80% of 1RM, preceded by static stretching (SS), PNF, and no stretching (NS) in the KE and BP exercises. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (NS × SS × PNF) revealed an influence of stretching for all intensities only when the PNF treatment was used. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the KE exercise, with reductions in the number of repetitions when comparing PNF40 (23.7 ± 2.7) to NS40 (27.5 ± 3.6); PNF60 (12.6 ± 2.8) to SS60 (16.5 ± 4.1) and NS60 (17.3 ± 3.2); and PNF80 (6.3 ± 1.7) to SS80 (9.9 ± 2.5) and NS80 (9.8 ± 2.3) conditions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were also found for the BP exercise with decreases in the number of repetitions when comparing PNF60 (13.7 ± 2.8) to NS60 (17.0 ± 3.0) and PNF80 (6.2 ± 2.2) to NS80 (8.7 ± 2.3) conditions. These findings suggest that for the intensities studied (40, 60, and 80% 1RM), only the PNF method decreased muscle endurance. Strength and conditioning professionals may want to consider avoiding PNF stretching before activities requiring local muscular endurance performance.
本研究旨在评估静态和本体感觉神经肌肉促进(PNF)拉伸方法对膝关节伸展(KE)和卧推(BP)运动在 40%至 80%1 重复最大强度(1RM)局部肌肉耐力表现的急性影响。15 名男性志愿者(23.9±4.3 岁;174.5±8.5cm;77.8±7.6kg),非运动员,但有抗阻训练经验,自愿参加本研究。参与者被分配到 9 个随机顺序的实验条件,其中所有受试者在 KE 和 BP 运动中分别进行 40%、60%和 80%1RM 的耐力测试,之前进行静态拉伸(SS)、PNF 和无拉伸(NS)。单向重复测量方差分析(NS×SS×PNF)显示,只有在使用 PNF 治疗时,拉伸对所有强度都有影响。KE 运动中发现了拉伸的显著差异(p<0.05),与 NS40(27.5±3.6)相比,PNF40(23.7±2.7)时重复次数减少;与 NS60(17.3±3.2)相比,PNF60(12.6±2.8)时重复次数减少;与 NS80(9.8±2.3)相比,PNF80(6.3±1.7)时重复次数减少。BP 运动中也发现了显著差异(p<0.05),与 NS60(17.0±3.0)相比,PNF60(13.7±2.8)时重复次数减少;与 NS80(8.7±2.3)相比,PNF80(6.2±2.2)时重复次数减少。这些发现表明,对于研究的强度(40%、60%和 80%1RM),只有 PNF 方法降低了肌肉耐力。力量和体能专业人员可能希望考虑在需要局部肌肉耐力表现的活动前避免 PNF 拉伸。