Suppr超能文献

健康饮食政策:种族自由主义、全球联系与有争议的科学

Healthy Eating Policy: Racial Liberalism, Global Connections and Contested Science.

作者信息

Mayes Christopher

机构信息

Alfred Deakin Institute of Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, 3216 Australia.

出版信息

Food Ethics. 2023;8(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s41055-022-00111-5. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

The challenges to designing and implementing ethically and politically meaningful eating policies are many and complex. This article provides a brief overview of Anne Barnhill and Matteo Bonotti's while also critically engaging with the place of racial justice, global interconnectedness, and debates over science in thinking about ethics and politics of public health nutrition and policy. I do not aim to burden Barnhill and Bonotti with the responsibility to fully address these issues, but considering the interconnection of these issues and the ever pressing effects of climate change on local and global food systems, we collectively need to turn to these difficult and pressing questions about what a just food system looks like, what concerns are centred, and who is left out. I group these engagements with Barnhill and Bonotti under three headings: racial liberalism, global food system, and contested nutrition science. I conclude with some remarks about locality.

摘要

设计和实施具有伦理和政治意义的饮食政策面临诸多挑战,且十分复杂。本文简要概述了安妮·巴恩希尔(Anne Barnhill)和马泰奥·博诺蒂(Matteo Bonotti)的观点,同时批判性地探讨了种族正义、全球互联性以及科学辩论在思考公共卫生营养和政策的伦理与政治方面所占据的地位。我并非旨在让巴恩希尔和博诺蒂承担全面解决这些问题的责任,但鉴于这些问题相互关联,以及气候变化对地方和全球粮食系统日益紧迫的影响,我们共同需要转向这些关于公正的粮食系统是什么样、哪些问题处于核心地位以及哪些人被排除在外的艰难且紧迫的问题。我将与巴恩希尔和博诺蒂的这些探讨归为三个标题:种族自由主义、全球粮食系统和有争议的营养科学。最后我对地方层面发表了一些看法。

相似文献

1
Healthy Eating Policy: Racial Liberalism, Global Connections and Contested Science.
Food Ethics. 2023;8(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s41055-022-00111-5. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Public Reason in a Pandemic: John Rawls on Truth in the Age of COVID-19.
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2022;50(3):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11406-021-00459-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.
J Appl Philos. 2005;22(2):185-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00302.x.
5
Liberalism, authority, and bioethics commissions.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Dec;34(6):461-77. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9271-3.
6
Solidarity and Public Health.
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):371-382. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10084-1. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems.
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):481-488. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1575446.
8
Liberalism and Public Health Ethics.
Bioethics. 2016 Feb;30(2):96-108. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12163. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Introduction to the Special Issue on Climate Ethics: Uncertainty, Values and Policy.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Oct;23(5):1247-1252. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9967-2. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
10
Public Reason, Bioethics, and Public Policy: A Seductive Delusion or Ambitious Aspiration?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Mar 11:1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000124.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the relevance of intersectionality in Australian dietetics: Issues of diversity and representation.
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jun;44(6):919-935. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13471. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Meeting the Moment: Bioethics in the Time of Black Lives Matter.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Mar;22(3):9-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001093. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Black to the Future: Making the Case for Indigenist Health Humanities.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168704.
4
Public Health Expertise Cannot Be Improvised.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1590. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305941.
5
6
"Now we say Black Lives Matter but … the fact of the matter is, we just Black matter to them".
Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(6):248-250.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50727. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
7
Stolen Breaths.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):197-199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2021072. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
EATLancet vs yes2meat: the digital backlash to the planetary health diet.
Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2153-2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32526-7. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
The EAT-Lancet Commission: a flawed approach?
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1140-1141. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31903-8.
10
Should dietary guidelines recommend low red meat intake?
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(16):2763-2772. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1657063. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验