Mayes Christopher
Alfred Deakin Institute of Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, 3216 Australia.
Food Ethics. 2023;8(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s41055-022-00111-5. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
The challenges to designing and implementing ethically and politically meaningful eating policies are many and complex. This article provides a brief overview of Anne Barnhill and Matteo Bonotti's while also critically engaging with the place of racial justice, global interconnectedness, and debates over science in thinking about ethics and politics of public health nutrition and policy. I do not aim to burden Barnhill and Bonotti with the responsibility to fully address these issues, but considering the interconnection of these issues and the ever pressing effects of climate change on local and global food systems, we collectively need to turn to these difficult and pressing questions about what a just food system looks like, what concerns are centred, and who is left out. I group these engagements with Barnhill and Bonotti under three headings: racial liberalism, global food system, and contested nutrition science. I conclude with some remarks about locality.
设计和实施具有伦理和政治意义的饮食政策面临诸多挑战，且十分复杂。本文简要概述了安妮·巴恩希尔（Anne Barnhill）和马泰奥·博诺蒂（Matteo Bonotti）的观点，同时批判性地探讨了种族正义、全球互联性以及科学辩论在思考公共卫生营养和政策的伦理与政治方面所占据的地位。我并非旨在让巴恩希尔和博诺蒂承担全面解决这些问题的责任，但鉴于这些问题相互关联，以及气候变化对地方和全球粮食系统日益紧迫的影响，我们共同需要转向这些关于公正的粮食系统是什么样、哪些问题处于核心地位以及哪些人被排除在外的艰难且紧迫的问题。我将与巴恩希尔和博诺蒂的这些探讨归为三个标题：种族自由主义、全球粮食系统和有争议的营养科学。最后我对地方层面发表了一些看法。
