Suppr超能文献

健康饮食政策:种族自由主义、全球联系与有争议的科学

Healthy Eating Policy: Racial Liberalism, Global Connections and Contested Science.

作者信息

Mayes Christopher

机构信息

Alfred Deakin Institute of Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, 3216 Australia.

出版信息

Food Ethics. 2023;8(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s41055-022-00111-5. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

The challenges to designing and implementing ethically and politically meaningful eating policies are many and complex. This article provides a brief overview of Anne Barnhill and Matteo Bonotti's while also critically engaging with the place of racial justice, global interconnectedness, and debates over science in thinking about ethics and politics of public health nutrition and policy. I do not aim to burden Barnhill and Bonotti with the responsibility to fully address these issues, but considering the interconnection of these issues and the ever pressing effects of climate change on local and global food systems, we collectively need to turn to these difficult and pressing questions about what a just food system looks like, what concerns are centred, and who is left out. I group these engagements with Barnhill and Bonotti under three headings: racial liberalism, global food system, and contested nutrition science. I conclude with some remarks about locality.

摘要

设计和实施具有伦理和政治意义的饮食政策面临诸多挑战,且十分复杂。本文简要概述了安妮·巴恩希尔(Anne Barnhill)和马泰奥·博诺蒂(Matteo Bonotti)的观点,同时批判性地探讨了种族正义、全球互联性以及科学辩论在思考公共卫生营养和政策的伦理与政治方面所占据的地位。我并非旨在让巴恩希尔和博诺蒂承担全面解决这些问题的责任,但鉴于这些问题相互关联,以及气候变化对地方和全球粮食系统日益紧迫的影响,我们共同需要转向这些关于公正的粮食系统是什么样、哪些问题处于核心地位以及哪些人被排除在外的艰难且紧迫的问题。我将与巴恩希尔和博诺蒂的这些探讨归为三个标题:种族自由主义、全球粮食系统和有争议的营养科学。最后我对地方层面发表了一些看法。

相似文献

3
Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.自由主义、法律道德主义与道德分歧。
J Appl Philos. 2005;22(2):185-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00302.x.
5
Liberalism, authority, and bioethics commissions.自由主义、权威与生物伦理委员会
Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Dec;34(6):461-77. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9271-3.
6
Solidarity and Public Health.团结与公共卫生。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):371-382. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10084-1. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems.分析卫生政策和体系中的权力和政治。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):481-488. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1575446.
8
Liberalism and Public Health Ethics.自由主义与公共卫生伦理
Bioethics. 2016 Feb;30(2):96-108. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12163. Epub 2015 May 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Meeting the Moment: Bioethics in the Time of Black Lives Matter.直面时刻:黑命攸关时代的生命伦理学
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Mar;22(3):9-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001093. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Black to the Future: Making the Case for Indigenist Health Humanities.《未来的黑色:为本土健康人文学辩护》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168704.
4
Public Health Expertise Cannot Be Improvised.公共卫生专业知识无法临时拼凑。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1590. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305941.
7
Stolen Breaths.被窃取的呼吸
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):197-199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2021072. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
The EAT-Lancet Commission: a flawed approach?《柳叶刀-饮食委员会》:一种有缺陷的方法?
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1140-1141. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31903-8.
10
Should dietary guidelines recommend low red meat intake?是否应该建议饮食指南推荐低红肉摄入量?
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(16):2763-2772. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1657063. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验