Direction de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement, École Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Family Medicine (CIET/PRAM), McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008311.
The National Inuit Strategy on Research focuses on advancing Inuit governance in research, increasing ownership over data and building capacity. Responding to this call for Inuit self-determination in research, academic researchers should consider cultural safety in research and ways to promote Inuit-led methods.
This scoping review collated academic literature on public health research in Inuit communities in Canada between 2010 and 2022. A critical assessment of methods used in public health research in Inuit communities examined cultural safety and the use of Inuit-attuned methods. Descriptive and analytical data were summarised in tables and figures. Knowledge user engagement in the research process was analysed with thematic analysis.
356 articles met the inclusion criteria. Much of the published research was in nutrition and mental health, and few initiatives reported translation into promotion programmes. Almost all published research was disease or deficit focused and based on a biomedical paradigm, especially in toxicology, maternal health and chronic diseases. Recent years saw an increased number of participatory studies using a decolonial lens and focusing on resilience. While some qualitative research referred to Inuit methodologies and engaged communities in the research process, most quantitative research was not culturally safe. Overall, community engagement remained in early stages of co-designing research protocols and interventions. Discussion on governance and data ownership was limited. Recent years saw emerging discussions on these issues. Knowledge user capacity-building was limited to brief training on conventional data collection methods.
The last decade of published public health research has not responded to the National Inuit Strategy on Research. Participatory research is gaining ground, but has not reached its full potential. A shift from biomedical to decolonised methods is slowly taking place, and public health researchers who have not yet embraced this paradigm shift should do so.
国家因纽特研究战略侧重于推进因纽特人在研究中的治理,增加对数据的所有权并建立能力。为了响应这种在研究中实现因纽特人自决的呼吁,学术研究人员应该考虑研究中的文化安全问题,并寻求促进以因纽特人为主导的方法。
本范围界定综述整理了 2010 年至 2022 年期间在加拿大因纽特社区进行的公共卫生研究的学术文献。对在因纽特社区进行的公共卫生研究中使用的方法进行了批判性评估,考察了文化安全和使用因纽特调整方法的情况。使用描述性和分析性数据以表格和图形形式进行总结。通过主题分析对知识用户在研究过程中的参与情况进行了分析。
符合纳入标准的文章有 356 篇。已发表的研究大多集中在营养和心理健康方面,很少有倡议报告将其转化为推广计划。几乎所有已发表的研究都侧重于疾病或缺陷,并且基于生物医学范式,特别是在毒理学、孕产妇健康和慢性病方面。近年来,越来越多的参与性研究采用去殖民主义视角,关注韧性。虽然一些定性研究提到了因纽特方法并让社区参与研究过程,但大多数定量研究没有考虑到文化安全。总体而言,社区参与仍处于共同设计研究方案和干预措施的早期阶段。关于治理和数据所有权的讨论有限。近年来,这些问题的讨论不断涌现。知识用户能力建设仅限于传统数据收集方法的简要培训。
过去十年发表的公共卫生研究没有响应国家因纽特研究战略。参与性研究正在取得进展,但尚未发挥其全部潜力。从生物医学方法向去殖民化方法的转变正在缓慢发生,尚未接受这种范式转变的公共卫生研究人员应该这样做。